PODA WEAPONS DEVOLUTION 3
Logistics
The old saw on amateurs studying
strategy and professionals studying logistics is one of those that everyone has
heard of yet nobody can be bothered with because it just ain’t very cool. The guy that figures out how to trap the
enemy into a corner and then proceeds to blast each and every body into subatomic
particles using several tons of explosives per pound of flesh is oohed and awed
by his compatriots and bought drinks at
the officers club and given bright shiny metals like some of those weird Soviet
dudes who were so bejeweled with awards they seriously listed to the left and
yet the guy that figured out how to get all those bombs past the Hippie
protesters and on to a ship past striking longshoreman and through a storm and
then unloaded under enemy mortar fire and through the jungle on trucks past
ambushes and then probably on to helicopters was just some Poindexter with
thick framed glasses who was thin and weak chinned and got no respect and was only the towel boy
in High School football and the jocks threw spitballs at the back of his oily
head. And yet, even THAT ain’t
logistics. That is a transportation
problem that most brilliant military commanders have solved-and there are few
enough of them out there that history has got a record on most of them. They call that logistics, and it is. But TRUE logistics is at a whole other level,
that of not transportation but of production.
*
I’m not trying to redefine that which
is more than adequately labeled but merely trying to get you to see a difference
between the means of production and the means of moving that production. Without one you can’t have another and both
are essential. For instance, Germany has
a wonderful system of rivers which are a real advantage in low cost and low
energy logistics. Then they militarized
their rail production early on to compliment the previous water system. But because they have always been a resource
poor nation ( they have ore and coal but not in the quantities needed to
compete with a lot of other nations jockeying for power and certainly no where
near their neighbor Russia- of course, NOBODY uses their limited resources as
smartly as the Germans do, probably not even the Japanese ), and because they have
no natural defenses they must always be offensively minded ( which is not the greatest mix of problems to
have ), they are always going to be at a disadvantage. Resources must be there, they must be well
managed, and they must be transported intelligently and timely. That is logistics. First, you must have the needed
materials. Second, you need to extract/form
them ( and those two must have an infrastructure installed to do so, part of
the cost of logistics ). Third, what is
traditionally thought of logistics, the getting stuff over yonder.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter
Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As
long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit
for your purchase. For those that can’t
get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me
occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.
*
All My Contact Info, Books For Sale, Links:
Speaking of Germany - they are slated to be almost completely green energy (aka not fossil fuels) in the near future- I think the figures discount major industrial infrastructure or transport or something, but it still shows a great deal of forward thinking on their part. Given their rail system, river system, and even their highway system (designed for less required maintenance than ours) and their current status as Europe's economic powerhouse, Germany stands in a good position for wise leadership to guide them through the collapse more gently than most.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. As long as they keep trade open with China for replacement parts ( I'm assuming their alt energy isn't home grown )
Delete