SURVIVAL DIVORCE 4
Girly Men
Once women gave up dependence on husbands and transferred
that to dependence on Uncle Sam and Benevolent Corporate Paychecks for sustenance
and protection, the inevitable result which was ignored as long as possible but
is now as plain as my flat Hank Hill ass, was pussyfication of Industrialized
Nation males. We pretty much turned into
girly-men. Not only are we meek and
submissive as husbands- both begging for sex now that females are no longer
compelled to use that as “job security” ( there were plenty of laws on the
books at one time underlying the importance of submissive females, but that has
been used to such an extent to vilify males they are today ignored. From the anthropology standpoint this made
sense but it is like talking about the difference between racism and xenophobia
today in that it is all emotional rather than logical ) - but they must also constantly try to keep
her from leaving him and cashing out.
There is about zero incentive anymore for males to marry, and the
statistics bear this out as lower class society frequently cohabitates rather
than legally marries ( the better off economic percentile has happier unions,
legal ones, as since two incomes are required for their lifestyles the male has
some leverage and is not totally at the mercy of the female ). But cohabitation statistics reflect status
and levels of satisfaction almost the same as being single. The facts clearly suggest that customs and
statures regulating bonding make for more stable more satisfying couples.
*
But economically males are now punished for
marriage. And male cultural roles are
punished. Men stay boys most of their
life because they can. It is not an
optimal social development. It reflects
a civilization mired in decadence having thrown off all common sense
dictates. Men must be providers for
their families as well as protectors.
Now, obviously, females have always been co-providers. You can’t live on twice or thrice monthly
hunted meat. You also need foraging
which females contribute. But males have
been the main providers since that required the muscle and aggression they
had. Which also provided the defensive
requirements ( or offensive when that was needed ). Today none of that is required. When you have
females choosing at their leisure if at all to have families, both gender roles
are discarded ( I am writing this from a male perspective, but I’m not totally
oblivious to the damage also sustained in the other camp. Our evolved roles are accepted and craved by
all- but when artificial constructs such as government benefiting from divide
and conquer intercede, most people grow up and live life in an unnatural
environment unhappy but never knowing
why ). And when husbands are judged to
be nothing more than a superior dildo and income supplement, boys don’t evolve
into men. Manly services are not
required ( stud services are irrelevant except after Extinction Level Events
and the need to quickly repopulate ).
Why bother providing, or protecting ( which also means “why risk doing
anything productive” )? Why bother
growing up?
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter
Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As
long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit
for your purchase. For those that can’t
get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me
occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.
*
All My Contact Info, Books For Sale, Links:
What do you get when you cross a rooster with an owl?
ReplyDeleteA cock that stays up all night.
Confucius Says: It take many nails to build crib but one screw to fill it.
ReplyDeleteAnony
Hey James; did you hear that Jim Nabors died?
ReplyDeleteThey found him lying face down on "the Hudson" :D
Not bad :)
Delete