intervention 2

INTERVENTION 2

China, to Chinese, is the middle kingdom, the center. All these other barbarous places full of non-Han, barbarians, is only of concern insofar as they dare intrude onto the affairs of the civilized folk of China. I applaud them, bravo Ornamental dudes. You understand the importance of tribe and detest the whole concept of diversity. Imagine, communists who are NOT politically correct ( and only globalist as far as it profits them ). Not all communists are as retarded as the ones in the West, evidently. Not that I want to live there. Here at least I have the option of Lamp Posting those bastards.

*

But I do admire folks who can tend to their own knitting and do what is right by their tribe. Regardless of their politics. And China has traditionally withdrawn to its own affairs when necessary. They really can stay out of international affairs when it is to their benefit. They can also get involved as needed. Right now, American imperialism needs to be thwarted, and that necessitates expanding China's control. They are not stupid, when it comes to national survival. The US isn't either, not really. We are just witnessing a period of decline where there are no correct moves.

*

Let's take two examples, from Chinese points of view. The US would simply love to agitate the Muzzies in western China. I'm pretty sure that is at least one reason we remain in Afghanistan ( it is a convoluted mess and not just a single motivation to remain in quagmire ). This necessitates a firm military response. Not because they are communist and evil, but because the muzzies would be American proxy troops. The other is Tibet. Wouldn't the US just delight to have control of so much of China's water sources? This means China involves herself internationally and expands its territory.

*

Am I saying that the US forced China to invade and occupy Tibet? Not exactly, but close enough. Do you wonder who helped Pakistan join the nuclear club? Just saying, it sure helped China thwart India, negating the southern threat to some degree. I don't know if India was ever really under the US umbrella, as they use and discard alliances as masterfully as Egypt, but now China has some protection just in case. I'm not being apologetic towards any Chinese dingus moves, but ALL countries act in such a manner, including our own. It is just realpolitik.

*

As to the argument that China must occupy the world to feed herself, this is of course nonsense. Do you see India, with nearly as many people, needing to colonize Africa to feed itself? And recall that China is not as dependent on the monsoons that can be fickle. No, China uses foreign farmland ( and farmers to factories ) to support a huge middle class, just as we used foreign oil to do so. Nor does China NEED to bribe the peasants with a middle class lifestyle to appease them and stop them from revolting. If anything, China must beware US intervention funding revolutionaries as in Hong Kong presently and most likely Tienanmen Square back in the day.

*

Chinese sharing of the wealth is just part of its communism. If things go well, the peasants partake. If not, all suffer equally. That is one thing that capitalist Kool-Aid drinkers can't seem to comprehend. It isn't how wealthy you are that is most important but how wealthy OTHER people are. That is just human nature, competition and mate selection. It really is relative. More than likely, in China creeping capitalism widening the wealth disparity will bring the most social turmoil.

*

I have nothing against capitalism, but like all systems it has its weaknesses. Right now, wealth inequality is far too massive. It isn't a big deal now, but it is a festering sore only idiots ignore, and it will explode once real deprivation is experienced. And of course, let us not forget capitalism is primarily a system built for colonization and ceding control to central banks. China cherry picks this system, and is better for it. But that also means, absent a true Rothschild's bank, they are limited it how many colonies it can control. This would include one in the US.

*

Mainly, China has a system better served by staying home and tending it its own affairs, right now just expansive enough to defend itself against the US ( if you don't believe America is an empire feeding its bankers, you are an incurable optimist and you appall me ). I can almost guarantee you a jelly filled donut that at the first opportunity China will voluntarily shrink. As such, its involvement with US occupation will be limited to economic interests. It will use local militias to provide security.

*

Again, you have to ask yourself what the risk to reward ratio is for any country proposing intervention. Wouldn't it be funny if Quebec, as part of the independence movement, intervened in the New England area? Large parts of Maine are only one generation removed from French ( at least at home ) speakers. But, that is just a side note. The bigger picture is China and Russia intervening. And both those countries are staying out of the way as we shoot ourselves in the foot. Then rubbing dog crap in it because the shaman said that was a cure ( what the hell, better than regular doctors today ). Why involve themselves?

*

Yes, they will help, but AFTER the immediate danger of any national military/nuclear response has passed. They want an end to our empire, not their country. It behooves them to make sure we split apart. They do NOT want to become a common enemy to unify the now warring factions. That means that the heavy lifting is up to local units. Just as the US took its sweet ass time getting involved in Europe ( mainly to wring more concessions from England, but also so that both sides over there exhausted each other first ).

*

If either, or both, countries get involved, they will wait until all sides have battled each other to near exhaustion, and then supply some material, but at a very dear cost. Concessions will be sold dear, not cheap. And for goodness sake, do NOT invite over any troops. That is called a beachhead ( just in case I am wrong about how much there is left to covet ). You are all better and more experienced troops anyway. And don't become greedy and then be too reliant on their supplies ( don't go gay over semi auto AK's after your guerrilla campaign with sniper rifles, for example. Then they get more out of you with each ammo dump )

*

( You take what they initially offer, stockpile most of it, ask for more as if you used it up, then don't suffer when they withhold that at the bargaining table. Even, or perhaps especially, your allies must be blind to your military capabilities. Because they could be your next enemy. Partisan warfare is multi-faceted, ongoing, exhaustive and more Machiavellian than any of us have any awareness of ).

( .Y. )

( today's related Amazon link click HERE )

*

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).

*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.

*** Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there