Wednesday, June 6, 2018

bitches didn't fight 1 of 3


BITCHES DIDN’T FIGHT
*
note: free book.  PA ( short story collection, all might not be PA ) https://amzn.to/2xMHMfL . 
*
I want to discuss why, historically, bitches didn’t fight.  And why it was a good thing.  Oh, don’t get me wrong, bitches be some nasty dirty low down vicious fighters.  But their strength is mental and social.  They are manipulative to a degree, just spawned, that Machiavelli couldn’t have achieved in three lifetimes.  Then, once they get training ( usually at the expense of poor dad ), their powers are only challenged by other females.  But as far as physically fighting, no.  They are actually too smart for that.  In general, females just don’t fight physically.  The current, mere fifty year old belief system that this wasn’t the case is a retarded notion only matched by Flat Earth enthusiasts.

*

Now, this erroneous “bitches be equal, even physically” near religious belief didn’t spring whole cloth out of the ether.   In every society there is a sliding bar of equality between genders that is determined by food production.  Mounted horsemen herders who fight off territorial intruders have a very unequal standing.  Fields in sub-prime soils, where the men must use brute strength, even with oxen, to plow, see a more unequal standing between the sexes.  In societies where men are not allowed to fight and where the labor to farm rice is about the same for male or female, there is a far more equal standing. 

*

This is not to say that females are powerless in a household run by a burly warrior-farmer.  They excel at manipulation, remember?  They might not be bossy, in charge, castrating fish-wives, but they aren’t completely as helpless as portrayed ( I’ll get into the whole current politically correct manipulation and propaganda aspect shortly, but primarily I’ll be focusing on post-apocalypse physical conflict with females.  Just don’t tune out when I start discussing politics.  It fits in here ).  The point is that all cultures are slightly different in this food production/equality measurement.

*

Once the Industrial Revolution began, give or take around a quarter millennia ago, the labor of the farm started being, in part, replaced by the labor of factories.  Gradually, the labor/equality spectrum began changing.  Not at first, as men were mining coal ( the machine only used in a few specific tasks such as pumping water or for an elevator ) and women were duplicating their farmhouse task of repetitive less physical tasks ( men traditionally use bursts of strength whereas females perform less-strength/less upper body tasks continuously ) such as at weaving looms, but it started the long slide of change ( which doesn’t even factor in moving to a money economy ).

*

And not all countries moving into the Industrial Revolution saw an equal movement away from gender roles.  England got a rather impressive head start, and that was thanks not to coal being discovered ( coal had been in use in China much longer ), and not JUST because of the steam engine, but because of the cloth industry in England from 300 years previously.  And a rather dick move by the elite called Enclosures.  It wasn’t just in Scotland that the rich bitches pushed people off the land to make way for sheep ( clothing industry.  Wool.  Hello? ).

*

In some ways, this was a firm push away from farming that many other countries didn’t see.  A happy accident on our way to Peak Carbon Fuels.  If you are poor and can’t farm, you go a little more willingly into the factories to work, wouldn’t you?  The factories weren’t exactly an improvement over farming, as capitalism depends on nearly free everything to work, which is about what labor received ( with competition comes downward price pressures, and why anyone is surprised that the working poor keep getting screwed is to not understand the very basics of the economic system you live in, an even more basic issue ignored by all, in an almost religious fevered maniacal manner, is that without dinosaur juice no large  industry is possible as we are used to it ).

*

150 years later men were still culturally unchallenged, as physical work and physical fighting were still very much in demand.  Only the money economy challenged the food production reward paradigm.  And that isn’t even relevant to the equation except after other forces already changed the equality measure.  Not quite simply, but basically on a broad scale, the difference began as we switched from coal to oil and the electrification of everywhere.  It suddenly became possible for women to match the physical labor output of men, once machines spread far enough and wide enough that the operator needed less upper body strength. 

*

Do you wonder why England is so far ahead of us in the politically correct cultural suicide spectrum?  Their manufacturing economy started sooner, then ended sooner, and women’s equality started earlier ( or, the fight towards equality, anyway ).  As for the ending part, once industrialization ended as the primary economic driver, and the so called service industry began, there was no longer any work left to differentiate men’s and woman’s labor ( and in the military, being mostly mechanized, computerized and push button automatic, females could actually take over more roles, at least as far as public perception if not in practice ).

*

Once women, through the money economy, could equally produce with men, the PC movement was off to the races.  Obviously there are other contributing factors, such as capitalists downward pressure on labor boosted by doubling the work force, but historically it had to happen just because of the food production reward.  I cover this, and the progression of the politically correct movement to its current logical conclusion, as you have to understand where this idiocy of female aggression and strength came from, and how unnatural it is, before we can discuss post-apocalypse gender roles and the use of aggression.  Despite history, far too many preppers think that they can have their cake and eat it too, as females will be mothers and housewives and yet still magically don the Linda Hamilton combat gear to defend against hostiles as the need arrives.  I’d like to refute the desirability of that duel role, but we’ll take our time getting there as is my wont.

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2LTk04E )
 
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184
*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

 

19 comments:

  1. Awww snap! Jim is playing his "A" game again. Following series, but again Lord Bison goes where no man has gone before, and high time this thought stream be crossed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I'm standing on the shoulders of giants with this, I think. But thanks for the enthusiasm. :)

      Delete
  2. I for one am interested in where you go with this. Back in my Navy days, I was taught welding by one woman and Advanced Damage Control by another. Our Diesel Fuel Injection rebuild specialist could run circles around me when it came time to open up a Cav Pump, but I was the one doing the actual remove and replace.

    Not that I disagree with your basic tenants, but unfortunately it is not quite as cut and dry as you may think.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They aren't fighters. They are petroleum power operators who are able to be such only because of men who built the infrastructure going back to coal mining and hydro engineers, etc. It sounds to me like these gals were supervisors, unable to do the heavy work. Like trying to put gals on cannon and they can't hump the ammo racks. Hopefully, you'll see where I'm coming from by the last installment. Rosie The Riveter and Debby The Diesel Dudette don't prove women are equal. They prove women can push buttons as well as men.

      Delete
    2. I should have said "...prove women are equal PHYSICALLY".

      Delete
    3. I do have a funny story about the time we got some 20 Mike's installed and the first person to fire one off was a cute Hispanic chick that weighted 90 lbs with gear on.

      That episode was a CCTV favorite for weeks, her helmet almost broke her nose and gave her a stitch or two.

      Delete
    4. Made much funnier by the suppressed hostility of the males in the first place, I imagine.

      Delete
    5. I would have laughed just as hard if it would have been that reject guy from FL had gotten tagged, and not her.
      I just did feel a little sorry for her, having good upbringing and all

      Delete
    6. True, other peoples pain is generally the source for all humor.

      Delete
  3. Correct, I think it would be in the women's collective best interests if an old/wise matron would counsel all females in general of the following advice. Work hard, strive for as much as possible but don't let over-expectations or "unwarranted demands" cause one to cross the line regarding biological and cultural places in society's existing arrangements or the natural world's order to things. There is too much uppity behavior by too many groups. There will inevitably be a harsh regression in response to these unnatural attempts. Expect patriarchal corporal punishments (with a switch allowed no thicker than your thumb rules) to become commonplace. Forced back into prairie dresses and back of the house labor positions. Flagrant public usurping of societal norms will result in flying lessons given off of tall buildings, or if available via helicopter rides. Looking forward to some dark ages for a few centuries to sort things out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It won't take but two generations. Hell, look at the changes we just had these last fifty years. From June Cleaver to pierced skinhead feminazi wearing pink vagi hats.

      Delete
  4. Yes, much of our current problems are a failure on the part of men in the many different positions of leadership to hold the line on culture, customs, upbringing-rearing of youth and it's enforcement in a punitive manner if necessary, or a simple reenforcement in a friendly but firm neighborly/uncle manner. I personally am a loner with no kids or women folk around probably because I am the type that will say what is necessary to be said, immediately, right then and there. Also as important is not being mealy mouthed and milk-toast, or allowing satan to play his games in my area of operation. One must look inward and determine what are they not doing or shoulda/coulda, and work on it. Long hard road, but it is the right path to take.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the basic issue is that if government law doesn't uphold customs, they die. Ours did it all for profit of course.

      Delete
    2. I have an almost identical profile to 5:38 above. Never married, no children, and a loner by choice. As far back as the early 80’s when I was still in high school, I understood that the feminist movement (even at that point in its advancement) had ruined any chances of my having a successful marriage or family. And even if you did manage to find someone decent, there would be no way to keep them and your children from being affected by our utterly polluted and degenerate pop-culture. I still dated for a while, but with each passing date, it only served to reinforce my initial thoughts.

      Notice how up until not too many years ago, when the workforce largely consisted of getting up before sunrise, plowing a field until after sunset, with enough energy left at the end of a day to swallow a few bites, hit the hay, and start all over again the next day. Or when working in a smoke filled factory for 14 hours a day, in order to put a loaf of bread on the table, there was no whining about being “discriminated against” and not receiving “equal opportunities”. This all changed when the workforce became a comfortable and safe place to be, and when earning big bucks for easy work became the norm. Then came the legislation to steal men’s jobs.

      And the worst part about it is that a good many men sided with the feminists and helped them to do it. Add these f_ _ kers to your lamp post list while you’re at it.

      Delete
    3. Would there be enough lamp posts? :)

      Delete
  5. Look around you. Everything constructive was made by men. Y'all might look at the 90s P/U community, if you desire the truth

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The truth might set you free, or just jack up your blood pressure some more.

      Delete
  6. This is kind of a visual aid as to what I was talking about above @6:33. This is why I would never have children in a society with a toxic pop-culture like America, even if I were young again.

    Christian fundamentalist girl:

    https://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wEzaIF1OxrY/S578-cMseII/AAAAAAAACd0/B-tvNVhyl6k/s1600-h/me+blue.jpg

    The same girl a few years after moving to the big city:

    http://hannahflaugher.blogspot.com/2013/10/me-update.html#comment-form

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rats crowded together in a cage-they just ain't right!

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED