johnny dear 2 of 2

JOHNNY DEAR 2

*
note: free books.  Zombies https://amzn.to/2JCUy5V .  Another https://amzn.to/2t8v0m7 .  Please, Sir, may I 'ave another? https://amzn.to/2LPw5qE . Yet another https://amzn.to/2LMU4qu .  A regular PA https://amzn.to/2Mp74Ug . 
*

How does one go about protecting his territorial resources without shooting innocents?  Can you?  My idiot neighbors ( I’m assuming I’ve moved back to the BPOD from town ) refused to leave after the town economically contracted and now they have all their little brown babies harvesting firewood ( get it?  Harvesting.  John Deere.  They are called Johnny Dear’s, harvesters ).  Now, let’s be honest.  It isn’t mine, nor is it theirs.  I consider it mine, and they consider it theirs, both from the viewpoint of need.  You know, that communist “to each according to his needs”.  The only way to settle this contest is through force.

*

A lot of preppers seem to be libertarians.  The two are a good fit.  To be free from government you need to be more self reliant, plus, you know better than anyone how evil government is and how stupid they are.  If you don’t seek independence they will make you suffer.  You start with guns and precious metals and then just a bit of food, just in case, and before you know it you are an actual prepper.  In my case, I was a survivalist first and a libertarian second, which thankfully allowed me to see the flaws in that political system.  As in, it flies in the face of biology.

*

The problem is that libertarianism and anarchy are blind to the need for naked aggression.  They do not see how most relationships MUST have a level of inequality and force ( please don’t try to preach to me how wrong I am by proving so with your philosophical teachings.  I’m well versed in them.  And while sympathetic, I understand they are STILL not feasible.  I remain an anarchist philosophically but temper its practice with reality ).  A libertarian will go on and on about how those that mix labor with resources are the rightful owner and have a natural right to defend such.  And they are in fact correct.  Yet, back in reality land ( it was a nice vacation in the Land ‘O Unicorn Glittery Farts, I sent a postcard ), in PRACTICE this is not possible.

*

I own an acre lot.  My neighbor owns an acre lot.  In between us and surrounding us are acres and acres of owned but unoccupied lots.  Who gets the resource on those lots?  The guy who runs off all the other owners.  Think about it for a second.  If you both play by Libertarian Rules, respecting each others private property, you will both end up without enough resources.  Someone will quickly find an excuse to go to war with the other, on ANY pretext, even an excuse that would horrify a private sector libertarian society arbitration specialist, and many people die.  That is REALITY as compared to PHILOSOPHY. 

*

The only way to make things work in a limited resource environment is to run off others from land that isn’t yours.  Land that you just decided to take by force.  That is how humans survive.  As I said, I love libertarianism.  But it is a product of its time, an age of carbon fuel surplus ( just as capitalism was a management system of the same era ).  Surplus is not the normal human condition.  Scarcity is.  Might Is Right is the domineering system that deals with scarcity.  All libertarians are going to deny this and hate me.  So be it.  Return to your favorite author and her favorite quote about ignoring reality.

*

If kids come on to “my” land and try to harvest “my” wood supply, what do I do?  Kill them?  Well, first, why haven’t I already ambushed their father as he was going to the privy at 5 AM?  Why is he still alive?  He poses the biggest threat.  Is it because all the surrounding areas are full of related individuals and they will cooperate against you?  Sure, you can move.  Now, how do you do that?  How do you move that two tons of wheat, unmolested?  You can’t move, and you can’t stay because there won’t be any wood left for you.

*

And your fate is sealed, being the “outsider” here.  You are the White Oppressor whose grand pappy’s pappy stole their land.  If you don’t fight, you die.  They might not shoot you, but they will surround you and leave no resources for you.  And as soon as one of their own “accidentally” moves on to your lot to get your wood, if you harm him they all have the justification they need to lynch you.  If you don’t hurt them but capture him, demanding compensation for the theft attempt, you are STILL the bad guy.  You caused PTS or some damn thing.  Mexican Mamma will be sure to rile up the men folk against you. 

*

If you do nothing, they keep trespassing and taking.  Long term, your only viable solution is to NOT have neighbors ( unless of your own tribe ).  To make that happen, you are going to need to shoot your neighbors.  Hopefully you only need to shoot the adult males, but you cannot guarantee the older boys or the females won’t be a threat.  In theory, the best tactic would be to fire their home, pick off the emerging armed folks and force the remainder to leave.  This brings us to them attacking you at your place, to have shelter and food, so you better have a plan for that. 

*

Are you beginning to see how advantageous being a hermit is?  How if you have a non-tribe member neighbor you could easily be screwed?  Just by their presence, they threaten you.  You have to bribe them to be one of your tribe, or fear them attacking you for resources, or eliminate them as a threat immediately.  We all sort of plan for an existence AFTER our area is secure, but we rarely look at how that has to happen.  Innocents must die so you do not.  And it isn’t just because of firewood.  It could be any resource.  AND, even if you don’t want to do this, if you don’t, your neighbor just might turn the tables on you. 

*

This is the reality of the collapse, not some libertarian wet dream of isolated farmers NOT molesting one another.  Think of it as a city, using imminent domain to expand their business zoning limits to gain tax base.  A few eggs need to be broken to make that omelet.  Non-violent in this case, but it did involve force.  You could graphically expel one family and hope the others flee in anticipation, Mongol city siege style, to minimize casualties ( well, really, murders, but remember you get to justify your bad behavior as a needy communist ).  But to survive, and ensure your continued survival, you must kill others to form your territory.  Then continue killing trespassers. 

*

If you don’t like the above scenario, you haven’t set up your preparations very well.  You are too close to people.  And, please remember, this is in territory where NON tribal members dwell.  If all your neighbors are stocked and part of your tribe, this all doesn’t apply.  Good luck being in that situation.

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2sRZx7C )

 

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ).

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there