BDF 3 of 3

BITCHES DIDN’T FIGHT 3

*
note: free books.  Looks like a love child of zombies and boat porn https://amzn.to/2LtY3YE .  Zombies at the zoo https://amzn.to/2Js7A25 .  Mega-disaster https://amzn.to/2xQ8dku .  Not my cup of tea, but perhaps yours-religious guide to End Times https://amzn.to/2kXDKI9 .  More zombies https://amzn.to/2xQ8XpM .
*

Common wisdom ( at least for those that show some bit of wisdom, a characteristic the Politically Correct crowd do not seem to have ) goes something like this.  Women lack the upper body strength to be fighters.  War was all about upper body strength powering weapons.  Then Colonel Colt came along and made everybody equal and now bitches get the vote and everybody is happy.  In a limited way this is of course true, and we all know a gal or two that gets wood at the shooting range, or is far better than us at accuracy, coordination and etcetera.

*

I’m not questioning that guns are a good thing for a female to have.  If they are so inclined, it is indeed empowering for a gal to have the means of self defense.  I don’t advocate that females return to completely helpless male dependent entities.  I had a wife that was so compliant that she got to the point of helplessness and she refused to make a lot of simple decisions for herself ( although she sure could eat extra Twinkies after I told her to quit feeding her ass ).  That was a huge pain in my butt after just a short time. 

*

What I am saying is that helplessness served a survival function, and as the ability to manufacture ammunition for the guns already out there ( not to mention the guns themselves losing the battle with entropy ) diminishes, females will by necessity be forced back into that role.  Okay, listen closely.  Here is the money shot for this entire series of articles.  Would you NORMALLY perceive a child as a military threat?  No, you wouldn’t.  And why not?  Because they pose zero threat to you.  Women were just like that.  They posed no threat and hence were not attacked.

*

Did you think about that for a second?  If females are armed, or even if they have a decent chance of being armed, they are automatically a potential risk and become an enemy combatant.  They become targets.  There is a reason women and children are “soft targets” historically and the GENERAL rule is you do not attack them.  I’m certainly NOT saying they weren’t slaughtered.  Many old people, infants and women were slaughtered.  It was a common practice ( I’ve argued before that in some cases this was actually a mercy, as killing all the tribes men left the women and children exposed to bandits, or wolves, or the elements ). 

*

But slaughtering the defenseless is not the same as eliminating the enemy fighters.  Slaughter was NOT a guarantee ( the Mongols only put all humans to the sword if the city refused to surrender.  Real quick, the next city got the message.  And the civilians were spared ).  In many cases, women and children were sold into slavery.  Which in some cases wasn’t even a bad thing.  Who is to say your food and shelter situation wasn’t improved?  I’m not condoning slavery, just pointing out in a food scarce situation it was preferable to death.

*

Now, I can already smell your rusted gears squeaking.  But, Jim, if all the women were armed and they repelled invaders, no women or children would be sold into slavery anyway.  First, you are forgetting about that upper body strength thing.  Second, you ignore evolutionary biology, and third, you are still licking the giant dildo of PC propaganda.  Which is embarrassing.  Please stop.  Point one, I don’t care how many PC bitches save the weak ass men with their chop suey martial arts silliness, that is all horsecrap.  It is entertainment.  Hello!   Strength still matters, more than leverage.

*

Point two, a species improves its survival rate or it perishes.  In humans, the eggs are the precious commodity.  Nearly all the sperm carriers can die and it doesn’t matter, and that is why the eggs are protected at all costs.  That is why the testicles fight and the ovaries don’t.  You don’t have females fight because their only job is to reproduce.  From the point of view of the species ( NOT the individual ), it doesn’t matter if the female has a baby by the husband, by invaders who rape her or by her new slave master.  She still reproduces.

*

And point three, there are major propaganda points you must ignore.  That females are equal in strength, that they are equal in physical aggression and that they are equal in propagation.  All of these are lies.  Those were covered in points one and two.  Point three is, you cannot believe ANYTHING the propagandists say because it is meant to undermine the first two points, and often indirectly which is how that manipulation traps you.  The “self-defense only” argument, which seems so reasonable and rational and which I’ve even agreed with, either out of initial ignorance or lately out of weariness of being overly argumentative, is a good case in point.

*

If you disagree with “women must have the means to defend themselves and their babies”, then you are labeled a monster ( which is the opening salvo in the cultural war, making you appear evil.  Hey, it worked against the Germans for generations! ).  And initially, that would be true.  Because men are just going to naturally assume that you are armed and dangerous, and you end up targeted.  In an assault, you’ll never be given a chance to see if you’ll be slaughtered or become a slave.  You’ll be dead, 100% of the time.  Because you are, or can be armed.  Very few WINNING tribes are going to be full of chivalrous warriors.  The ones that survive long term will be the ones who “cheat” in war. 

*

Which means they don’t line up in front of the gates and call out for battle.  Rather, they attack at night and set fire to the place and pick off those fleeing the fire.  And at first, that will include all males reaching puberty AND all females.  Who will be assumed to be armed.  UNLESS.  The smart gals will run out naked carrying nothing.  OR, the smart tribe will revert to the historical norm and prohibit females from being armed.  If the enemies know this, while sometimes the females will be slaughtered ( although not usually since the majority of raids are for mates ), it will not be 100% assured as it would if they were thought to be armed.

*

I know you don’t care for this conclusion.  And I know the PC pundits will argue against everything I’ve said.  But just take this away with you.  The winners follow biology.  Not theology. 

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2kKrpGT )

 

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there