daily ad

Friday, June 8, 2018

BDF 3 of 3


BITCHES DIDN’T FIGHT 3
*
note: free books.  Looks like a love child of zombies and boat porn https://amzn.to/2LtY3YE .  Zombies at the zoo https://amzn.to/2Js7A25 .  Mega-disaster https://amzn.to/2xQ8dku .  Not my cup of tea, but perhaps yours-religious guide to End Times https://amzn.to/2kXDKI9 .  More zombies https://amzn.to/2xQ8XpM .
*
Common wisdom ( at least for those that show some bit of wisdom, a characteristic the Politically Correct crowd do not seem to have ) goes something like this.  Women lack the upper body strength to be fighters.  War was all about upper body strength powering weapons.  Then Colonel Colt came along and made everybody equal and now bitches get the vote and everybody is happy.  In a limited way this is of course true, and we all know a gal or two that gets wood at the shooting range, or is far better than us at accuracy, coordination and etcetera.

*

I’m not questioning that guns are a good thing for a female to have.  If they are so inclined, it is indeed empowering for a gal to have the means of self defense.  I don’t advocate that females return to completely helpless male dependent entities.  I had a wife that was so compliant that she got to the point of helplessness and she refused to make a lot of simple decisions for herself ( although she sure could eat extra Twinkies after I told her to quit feeding her ass ).  That was a huge pain in my butt after just a short time. 

*

What I am saying is that helplessness served a survival function, and as the ability to manufacture ammunition for the guns already out there ( not to mention the guns themselves losing the battle with entropy ) diminishes, females will by necessity be forced back into that role.  Okay, listen closely.  Here is the money shot for this entire series of articles.  Would you NORMALLY perceive a child as a military threat?  No, you wouldn’t.  And why not?  Because they pose zero threat to you.  Women were just like that.  They posed no threat and hence were not attacked.

*

Did you think about that for a second?  If females are armed, or even if they have a decent chance of being armed, they are automatically a potential risk and become an enemy combatant.  They become targets.  There is a reason women and children are “soft targets” historically and the GENERAL rule is you do not attack them.  I’m certainly NOT saying they weren’t slaughtered.  Many old people, infants and women were slaughtered.  It was a common practice ( I’ve argued before that in some cases this was actually a mercy, as killing all the tribes men left the women and children exposed to bandits, or wolves, or the elements ). 

*

But slaughtering the defenseless is not the same as eliminating the enemy fighters.  Slaughter was NOT a guarantee ( the Mongols only put all humans to the sword if the city refused to surrender.  Real quick, the next city got the message.  And the civilians were spared ).  In many cases, women and children were sold into slavery.  Which in some cases wasn’t even a bad thing.  Who is to say your food and shelter situation wasn’t improved?  I’m not condoning slavery, just pointing out in a food scarce situation it was preferable to death.

*

Now, I can already smell your rusted gears squeaking.  But, Jim, if all the women were armed and they repelled invaders, no women or children would be sold into slavery anyway.  First, you are forgetting about that upper body strength thing.  Second, you ignore evolutionary biology, and third, you are still licking the giant dildo of PC propaganda.  Which is embarrassing.  Please stop.  Point one, I don’t care how many PC bitches save the weak ass men with their chop suey martial arts silliness, that is all horsecrap.  It is entertainment.  Hello!   Strength still matters, more than leverage.

*

Point two, a species improves its survival rate or it perishes.  In humans, the eggs are the precious commodity.  Nearly all the sperm carriers can die and it doesn’t matter, and that is why the eggs are protected at all costs.  That is why the testicles fight and the ovaries don’t.  You don’t have females fight because their only job is to reproduce.  From the point of view of the species ( NOT the individual ), it doesn’t matter if the female has a baby by the husband, by invaders who rape her or by her new slave master.  She still reproduces.

*

And point three, there are major propaganda points you must ignore.  That females are equal in strength, that they are equal in physical aggression and that they are equal in propagation.  All of these are lies.  Those were covered in points one and two.  Point three is, you cannot believe ANYTHING the propagandists say because it is meant to undermine the first two points, and often indirectly which is how that manipulation traps you.  The “self-defense only” argument, which seems so reasonable and rational and which I’ve even agreed with, either out of initial ignorance or lately out of weariness of being overly argumentative, is a good case in point.

*

If you disagree with “women must have the means to defend themselves and their babies”, then you are labeled a monster ( which is the opening salvo in the cultural war, making you appear evil.  Hey, it worked against the Germans for generations! ).  And initially, that would be true.  Because men are just going to naturally assume that you are armed and dangerous, and you end up targeted.  In an assault, you’ll never be given a chance to see if you’ll be slaughtered or become a slave.  You’ll be dead, 100% of the time.  Because you are, or can be armed.  Very few WINNING tribes are going to be full of chivalrous warriors.  The ones that survive long term will be the ones who “cheat” in war. 

*

Which means they don’t line up in front of the gates and call out for battle.  Rather, they attack at night and set fire to the place and pick off those fleeing the fire.  And at first, that will include all males reaching puberty AND all females.  Who will be assumed to be armed.  UNLESS.  The smart gals will run out naked carrying nothing.  OR, the smart tribe will revert to the historical norm and prohibit females from being armed.  If the enemies know this, while sometimes the females will be slaughtered ( although not usually since the majority of raids are for mates ), it will not be 100% assured as it would if they were thought to be armed.

*

I know you don’t care for this conclusion.  And I know the PC pundits will argue against everything I’ve said.  But just take this away with you.  The winners follow biology.  Not theology. 

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2kKrpGT )
 

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184
*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

 

14 comments:

  1. Correct again Jim. I am of age to have witnessed these changes to roles in our western society. I also witnessed via occupational observations (Marine infantry/security) that females have by the vast majority numerically evolved through these cultural cues into an assertive and often aggressive adversary. They assume the shaved head navy seal roles portrayed in movies or protective momma bear roles, but don't pack enough gear to really fulfill these pretend roles. When crunch times come (tomorrow is soon enough) I for one am not bound by p.c./geneva convention restrictions. The mental mindset is in place to eliminate any threats in area of operation, wherever that may be. Not of tribe-eliminate. Women, kids, stray dogs-eliminate. They are mouths to feed, distractions/nuisances to mission. Minions should not be mentally corrupted-polluted by former civic/christian morals that cannot be applied to collapse conditions and will cause them to be killed themselves and their gear split up by the new interlopers. Stay frosty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Article coming up on clearing out your AO of threats. Since Vietnam you should have known kids and women pose just as much of a threat as males. And stray dogs :) Probably rabid.

      Delete
  2. women may not have upper body strength, but they have other things on their upper bodies that makes them extremely deadly.

    Combining those things with a natural ability to be cunning has made them important to many military campaigns as spies and couriers. How many men died because of Belle Boyd or the 15 percent of the French Resistance in WW2?

    All in all, not a bad series, but I think you missed a few points

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As I said first paragraph first part, bitches be crazy mean and deadly. They just aren't physical. Again, a spy or terrorist isn't necessarily a fighter ( absent Col. Colts invention, how many terrorists would be female? Mostly they are there today as theatre ). I am speaking of the historical norm tend of thousands of years right up to the Industrial Revolution. If not hundreds of thousands of years. Until firearms, the norm held. A gal armed with a dagger wasn't considered enough of a threat to kill them off as a danger. A firearm is.

      Delete
  3. You're wrong.
    THIS is the money shot:

    "...you are still licking the giant dildo of PC propaganda..."

    LOL

    This article is like eating an ear of corn.
    You have to strip off the husk and hair to get to the meat.
    Hair and Husk = programming, or, mental conditioning since birth

    Don't like it or disagree with it?
    Tough. Truth doesn't have feelings.

    I'm so glad my wife isn't "modern", otherwise I'd be single.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well done Jim. Unfortunately through the promulgation of mass media, (movies/television,print/magazines/novels,internet-bot advertising) the western populace has been quite brainwashed with what the "writer/producer/actor-news anchor" has put forth as reality-truth-facts. This, although can be convincing and accepted by many, is not easily swallowed by the "others". Those "others" ain't buying the line of bullshit. The "others" have lived in the here and now of reality, and are in tune to the natural order of things. The "others" have wisdom far beyond social justice college degrees or titled corporate and government employment positions. The meek shall inherit the earth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I figure my mission in life is to give the minions starting points on surviving more the rebuild than the die-off ( I can't do much about your preps or lack thereof, except give the cheapest version ). Perhaps this might at least be in the back of minds. Hey, perhaps we have to try something new for us, same as the old way.

      Delete
    2. Jim, after a long and messy situation that is so soon coming. I will have my wrecking crew name elementary schools, parks and playgrounds after Lord Bison. Fertile mothers will have birthing documents reflect the male child's first name as that of: JIM. Forever more, when two fellows get together and there is a quandry, one will ask the other, "What would Jim do?"

      Delete
    3. No buxomly maidens screaming out in pleasure as their warriors pleasure them, Dear Jim!
      ???

      Delete
  5. Sent you an email related to this article.
    Marauders would be highly mistaken to turn their backs on my LOL...
    She is quite good with a blade and can shoot well too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which is necessary for the die-off. It mostly becomes problematic afterwards. Long term. I'll check my e-mail after this.

      Delete
  6. I think it will be many generations at least before women are not seen as a possible/probable threat, thanks to all the current PC programming AND the very real threat of a colt backed ability to fight for the 'mama bear' inclined women out there. Even a dagger properly wielded can take out a spear carrying warrior - and the mindset of woman as last line defender will linger as a cultural artifact for quite a while. And I LIKE that idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It only took two generations to go from Old School to Totally Humped Up, culturally. And no one was trying to kill us. I think your timeline is too optimistic-we'll revert back much quicker. The Darwin Awards don't allow Do-Overs.

      Delete

I must moderate-trust me. Criticize ideas, NOT the people behind them. Be civil. You will be warned twice and the third time just deleted. No N-Bombs. If you disagree with me, you must praise my hair first.