bitches didn't fight 1 of 3

BITCHES DIDN’T FIGHT

*
note: free book.  PA ( short story collection, all might not be PA ) https://amzn.to/2xMHMfL . 
*

I want to discuss why, historically, bitches didn’t fight.  And why it was a good thing.  Oh, don’t get me wrong, bitches be some nasty dirty low down vicious fighters.  But their strength is mental and social.  They are manipulative to a degree, just spawned, that Machiavelli couldn’t have achieved in three lifetimes.  Then, once they get training ( usually at the expense of poor dad ), their powers are only challenged by other females.  But as far as physically fighting, no.  They are actually too smart for that.  In general, females just don’t fight physically.  The current, mere fifty year old belief system that this wasn’t the case is a retarded notion only matched by Flat Earth enthusiasts.

*

Now, this erroneous “bitches be equal, even physically” near religious belief didn’t spring whole cloth out of the ether.   In every society there is a sliding bar of equality between genders that is determined by food production.  Mounted horsemen herders who fight off territorial intruders have a very unequal standing.  Fields in sub-prime soils, where the men must use brute strength, even with oxen, to plow, see a more unequal standing between the sexes.  In societies where men are not allowed to fight and where the labor to farm rice is about the same for male or female, there is a far more equal standing. 

*

This is not to say that females are powerless in a household run by a burly warrior-farmer.  They excel at manipulation, remember?  They might not be bossy, in charge, castrating fish-wives, but they aren’t completely as helpless as portrayed ( I’ll get into the whole current politically correct manipulation and propaganda aspect shortly, but primarily I’ll be focusing on post-apocalypse physical conflict with females.  Just don’t tune out when I start discussing politics.  It fits in here ).  The point is that all cultures are slightly different in this food production/equality measurement.

*

Once the Industrial Revolution began, give or take around a quarter millennia ago, the labor of the farm started being, in part, replaced by the labor of factories.  Gradually, the labor/equality spectrum began changing.  Not at first, as men were mining coal ( the machine only used in a few specific tasks such as pumping water or for an elevator ) and women were duplicating their farmhouse task of repetitive less physical tasks ( men traditionally use bursts of strength whereas females perform less-strength/less upper body tasks continuously ) such as at weaving looms, but it started the long slide of change ( which doesn’t even factor in moving to a money economy ).

*

And not all countries moving into the Industrial Revolution saw an equal movement away from gender roles.  England got a rather impressive head start, and that was thanks not to coal being discovered ( coal had been in use in China much longer ), and not JUST because of the steam engine, but because of the cloth industry in England from 300 years previously.  And a rather dick move by the elite called Enclosures.  It wasn’t just in Scotland that the rich bitches pushed people off the land to make way for sheep ( clothing industry.  Wool.  Hello? ).

*

In some ways, this was a firm push away from farming that many other countries didn’t see.  A happy accident on our way to Peak Carbon Fuels.  If you are poor and can’t farm, you go a little more willingly into the factories to work, wouldn’t you?  The factories weren’t exactly an improvement over farming, as capitalism depends on nearly free everything to work, which is about what labor received ( with competition comes downward price pressures, and why anyone is surprised that the working poor keep getting screwed is to not understand the very basics of the economic system you live in, an even more basic issue ignored by all, in an almost religious fevered maniacal manner, is that without dinosaur juice no large  industry is possible as we are used to it ).

*

150 years later men were still culturally unchallenged, as physical work and physical fighting were still very much in demand.  Only the money economy challenged the food production reward paradigm.  And that isn’t even relevant to the equation except after other forces already changed the equality measure.  Not quite simply, but basically on a broad scale, the difference began as we switched from coal to oil and the electrification of everywhere.  It suddenly became possible for women to match the physical labor output of men, once machines spread far enough and wide enough that the operator needed less upper body strength. 

*

Do you wonder why England is so far ahead of us in the politically correct cultural suicide spectrum?  Their manufacturing economy started sooner, then ended sooner, and women’s equality started earlier ( or, the fight towards equality, anyway ).  As for the ending part, once industrialization ended as the primary economic driver, and the so called service industry began, there was no longer any work left to differentiate men’s and woman’s labor ( and in the military, being mostly mechanized, computerized and push button automatic, females could actually take over more roles, at least as far as public perception if not in practice ).

*

Once women, through the money economy, could equally produce with men, the PC movement was off to the races.  Obviously there are other contributing factors, such as capitalists downward pressure on labor boosted by doubling the work force, but historically it had to happen just because of the food production reward.  I cover this, and the progression of the politically correct movement to its current logical conclusion, as you have to understand where this idiocy of female aggression and strength came from, and how unnatural it is, before we can discuss post-apocalypse gender roles and the use of aggression.  Despite history, far too many preppers think that they can have their cake and eat it too, as females will be mothers and housewives and yet still magically don the Linda Hamilton combat gear to defend against hostiles as the need arrives.  I’d like to refute the desirability of that duel role, but we’ll take our time getting there as is my wont.

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2LTk04E )

 

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there