FEMA camp 1 of 2

FEMA CAMP

*
note: free books.  EMP https://amzn.to/2Jp5djz .  Another https://amzn.to/2HjTEFb .  A rare hen's tooth, a better written zombie book https://amzn.to/2LkxhSF . 
*

In most of the world you’ve noticed a very marked trend.  Farming is mechanized in the countryside and the population moves to the cities for jobs.  Land prices are kept high or private ownership prohibited or slums allowed, all to push this trend.  In Australia, a huge continent, you can’t even buy junk land.  In Switzerland, even fifty years ago the peasants were priced out of the market.  In the US, rural land is affordable but lack of public transportation ( a deliberate policy ) means automobile ownership added to the price of the land make most rural living arrangements unrealistic ( jobs, the few left,  are kept in the cities.  There are exceptions but they are not the broad trend ).

*

There is a delightful phrase, managing the decline.  In some aspects, this is obviously done poorly.  The best way to do this would be to give land to the poor and convert to rail, and go back to a decentralized organic French Intensive method of food and livestock production.  You could keep our current oil dependent infrastructure to feed everyone during the transition.  But the poor aren’t going to do this, as everyone is stuck on the couch in front of the TV with the only occupations being managing the consumption of oil.  The poor won’t encage in manual labor while the “rich” ( to their eyes ) sit in cubicle comfort.  The cubicle warriors won’t give up their perceived safety gilded cages in the suburbs, the place the farms need to go.

*

Nobody wants this arrangement, and the powers that be certainly have no desire to push for it.  We have a long way to go downwards in energy consumption prior to food security being endangered.  Those managing the decline most likely have little desire to see actual sustainability.  Where is the social engineering and control in that?  They have all the time in the world to push centralization as opposed to decentralization.

*

All these idiots that push for total AI and job automation and The Singularity?  Buffoons without a clue.  All that takes EXTRA energy.  Sure, if the Internet had stopped at e-mails, the energy needed to deliver correspondence would have declined.  But Facebook and cute kitten videos suck up a lot of resources.  Does Amazon take more or less energy than a mail order catalog?  People need to be fed one way or another, so why not have them working while already fed and they consume less than robots and computer server farms.  The “energy savings” of automation were suspect from the beginning.  A “green” action by a company is always about saving money, not Mother Earth.

*

The future is LESS energy, not more.  Centralizing bodies in urban areas allow the current industrialized oil age users to consume less resources.  They would use almost none on those farms, but that isn’t going to happen.  At least not on time.  The only thing being done now is to warehouse the population into urban areas.  Less energy.  Far more control.  I would go so far as to call the cities the new FEMA camps.  We don’t need to wait for black helicopters and old military bases to be converted.  The camps are already in place and built.

*

Remember, during energy contraction you use the infrastructure you already have, no matter how ill suited.  This is just reality.  Fewer resources mean no new infrastructure.  We aren’t going to replace the auto fleet with all electric cars.  Nor are we going to rebuild all of New Orleans or Houston or Detroit.  We aren’t going to build concentration camps for any serious number of people ( a very small number, perhaps.  Possible if not probable.  Today, dissidents are just kangaroo court sentenced to serve jail time with real criminals like murderers ). 

*

FEMA death camps are a fantasy, just like the Blue Hemet UN One World Government threat.  Here is why.  You don’t give almost two hundred million pissed off gun owners ( I assume a higher number than current iffy statistics because of gun loans to fellow revolutionaries who are unarmed ) a target.  Why would you give the pitchfork and torches mob a sign saying “evil king this way”?  You create false targets ( the UN and FEMA concentration camps ), while hiding the real threat ( the bankers ).  You give them fake worries ( gun control ) to hide the real weapon ( food control ). 

*

Right there alone is a good enough reason to mismanage the decline.  Food control is people control.  Decentralized farms only make sense to everyone NOT in control.  Those pulling the levers behind the curtain love the idea of centralized farms and long distance freight.  Total and complete control.  Gun control could be achieved tomorrow, with ammunition sales being stopped.  Just stopped.  The companies are nationalized and used only for the military.  Guns are still legal and kept in your hands.  You just don’t get any ammo ( ammo imports are also banned ).  It is that simple.  Sure, the Constitution says you can be armed.  It doesn’t protect your ability to buy ammunition, does it?

*

And how hard would it be to enact food control?  The “answer” to the health care costs and medical availability would be a Michelle Obammy vegetarian whole grain diet.  All citizens must be issued food cards so your diet is monitored.  We can’t allow unpopular foods to be consumed, such as bacon or butter.  The food is free, of course.  No child left behind.  And in with those added vitamins are vaccines because as a world citizen it is your duty to not spread barnyard flu. 

*

Okay, perhaps it is over the top.  But there are plenty of other ways.  You can go the opposite direction and give out free unhealthy foods, like the white flour and shortening oil the AmerIndians get.  Let diabetes and malnutrition weaken them to the point of non resistance.  Really, we are already living under food control, and it isn’t obvious.  The few government monopoly allowed corporations growing, processing and transporting our foods will go along with government dictate without any squabble, to keep their positions.  The infrastructure is in place already, implementation only a matter of time.

*

The answer of growing your own food isn’t much of an answer, as we’ll see tomorrow, but a partial answer is to escape the camp where it is easier to control you and enforce their will.

END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2kFLoqu )

 

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page ( or from www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me the money and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there