Tuesday, January 23, 2018

control central


CONTROL CENTRAL

While it’s true that our whole civilization and everything in it which has been misdirected towards running off petroleum is imploding as we speak ( especially our culture, not just our machines-do you think it would be possible to shelter crazy cat ladies in their own domiciles with their own set of appliances, wasting heat and cooling and food on an excess of domesticated pets, otherwise? In the future as in the past, bitter lesbian Women Libbers won’t be coddled and rewarded as they are a direct threat to the breeders ), it still behooves us to study how things used to work.

*

By knowing how they worked you can understand how the future will unfold.  If you erroneously believe that the Rothschild bank is going to take over the world by carbon taxing everyone during the implementation of Agenda 51, you are looking at the wrong threat.  If you think the federal government will get stronger, you are preparing for the wrong disaster.  This article explores the duties and roles of the three modern control mechanisms that the Elite are comprised of, and puts them into perspective so you might evaluate threats more logically.

*

First off, forget any conspiracy theory that goes against physics ( to include antimatter, Tesla free energy generation, Green Alien Overlords [ any race capable of fast enough space travel doesn’t need our puny planet and its naked monkey descendents ], chemtrails or weather modification ).  If we had to drop out of the Space Race AND ship all our factories overseas due to a falling oil supply, you can’t will extra energy into the equation to pretend to present a solution to our problems. 

*

( And remember, an abundance of extremely low to negative net energy liquid fuel does NOT mean we are Energy Independent.  It means we will invent extra financing and use the already in place oil infrastructure to keep the level of liquid fuels up at the current demand so as to keep the economy going to keep the Fake Fuel extraction going which keeps the economy going which keeps the bankers going.  Low Net Energy sources are not a solution, they are the last can kicked down the road.  Nazi coal fuel mined by Jewish slave workers as the Soviets invade ).

*

Lefties scream and shriek that evil Republican corporations are ruling the earth.  Libertarians think the evil banks are forming a one world government.  Militia members think that the FedGov will turn every empty building in Detroit into a concentration camp.  Any everyone is wrong.  Corporations cannot exist without banker finance and government protection.  Bankers need governments that need financing ( and will protect them ) and corporations that will feed and house them.  And the government would be puny without financing by the banks and corporations that extend their control for a profit.

*

No one branch can do it all.  They all need each other.  The government could finance itself, but they cannot do so anywhere close to as efficiently as a privately held central bank.  Corporations could protect themselves ( ala cyberpunk sci-fi ) but it is cheaper to get the government to do it.  And bankers could take over the world but couldn’t police it or run it.  You see, being the elite is being like a farmer in a small country.  You have a son, he needs new farmland to raise a family of his own.  Why do you think the Mennonites and similar are spreading out to crappy land needing irrigation? 

*

The elite spawn, and then need yet more profit to set Mr. Elite Junior up in his own empire.  To maximize profits you undertake to cut your costs, as well as specializing ( just as different birds evolve to feeding at different elevation levels of the jungle, lessoning competition for scarce resources ).  The banker, government or corporate bureaucrats impose different operating costs and fill their niche so fewer compete.  Yet at the same time the branches complement each other.  The bankers fund the insurance company, the government mandates coverage and the companies administer the daily operations.  The bankers get interest, the government gets taxes and the companies make a profit.

*

Government bureaucrats are necessary to run a non-profit where there is no customer supply and demand.  But they couldn’t properly run a bank that is a much leaner organization ( and staffed with pointier heads ), nor could they run a company which always is downsizing its bureaucracy.  Different ways of doing business.  Different motivations.  The government controllers must expand, companies must shrink and bankers need to control a core group that remains frozen. 

*

Now, you might be asking yourself about the Revolving Door Policy, whereby central bank executives run the governments Treasury Department and military officers are on defense contractors boards of directors or made into consultants.  Ask another question.  What does the Treasury do, if not act as a rubber stamp for the bankers?  And, what are boards of directors if not rubber stamps for a profitable CEO?  The positions are just bribes, they are not leadership roles. 

*

Okay, you counter, so what about the Battling Deep State?  Things might be tense as profits shrink and the job of raking in lucre might be more difficult ( no longer is it automatic ), but I don’t see any cutthroat activity, merely a more seemingly seamless protection racket unfolding.  Why else are the bankers only lending to mega-corporations and the government, the government relaxing regulations to the point of non-enforcement, and the propping up of the stock market ( to pay billions and billions to CEO’s and ilk )?  Is that competition between branches or cooperation?  Sure, within a branch there is more brutality.  Goldman pulls the plug on Lehman’s, the CIA might remove a President, corporations Hoover each other after weakening each other.  But the game stays the same, doesn’t it?  The three branches keep to their bailiwicks.

*

And as I’ve said many a time, resource surplus will always see expansion and resource contraction always sees decentralization.  Always.  To assume otherwise is to contradict physics.  If our resources are contracting, government or banks or business cannot grow without another resource user getting less.  Hollywood finances their movies from overseas audiences, as the native audience holds out for discounted fare.  Both aren’t growing in a contracting economy.  You can’t have a One World Government if it gets less money, energy and real resources every day.  You can’t have a Industrial War if industries raw materials are in severe contraction.

*

We are screwed, we WILL die, but at least identify the correct enemy to slightly increase your odds of surviving slightly longer. 

END ( today's related link http://amzn.to/2mE8ldZ )
 
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me a buck and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184
*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.***   Land In Elko*  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
 

 

17 comments:

  1. I have...we are our own worst enemy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are our own biggest cheering squad, which makes us our own worst enemy through hubris. Although I guess that ties in to tribal identity. All our individual bad traits are tribal survival characteristics. Embrace your faults! :)

      Delete
    2. When reading about Russian military capabilities the article said that Americans over state their capabilities and Russians understate. When Russian big wigs say they can achieve X they can achieve it and then some.

      Delete
    3. I wonder if understating is a cultural leftover from Stalin.

      Delete
  2. Some days I wonder why I read your blog.....I can get depressed all by myself LOL. Following your logic I don't think I will live long enough to see the real end game. It's been unfolding for over 50 years. Most of the time I think that the can has been kicked as far as it can be, then I think about how far its already been kicked. How much longer can the "can" be kicked? My kids say I've been right for 20 years but timing this is like timing the stock market. Timing is for fools. If I die before it all hits the fan (for the last time), Then my kids will still get this "stuff".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hopefully, you read every day to learn how to laugh at the absurdity of it all. Plus, who doesn't need motivation to buy the 1,001st can of pork and beans :)

      Delete
    2. Agreed Solar, how long can this can be kicked? I don't understand it apparently, as to how a sunk ship can continue on it's journey like this one has. I will die before it does.

      Side note, off topic:
      Stopped in at the Family Dollar yesterday to grab a bag of hamburger rolls for some sloppy joes I was gonna make for supper. Got to the counter and no one was in sight. I yelled, politely, "Anyone here?" Crickets. About 2 minutes later a fat, sloppy hillbilly bitch comes staggering in the door and walked behind the counter, stopping to put her not-yet-finished smoke on the shelf, for finishing later, and rang me up. No bag, no receipt, just a few coins in change. I walked out to my ride and a another dollar store bitch was standing out there having a smoke. I got home and told my wife about this and she told me she just came back from there an hour ago and them 2 stupid bitches were standing out in the parking lot smoking when she was there.

      I got to thinking, all the store items are inventoried and bar coded, video cameras are through out the store, so "Why hasn't this place been fully automated yet?" Just 1 person on duty to step in if something goes wrong and if it goes wrong bad enough they can just lock the door.

      THAT is how automation is going to take over all commerce in the US. Why should a company, and it's customers, bear the expanding and overwhelming burden of retarded human employees of they don't have to?

      Delete
    3. WOA!!! Do you want your $1 items to be $1.25 instead? If putting up with banjo playing employees is the price for saving money, sign me up. Employing one person deters shoplifting and saves on the extra costs of robots. This is already the lowest cost solution. If you can explain how to solve the shoftlifter/vandalizer issue with automation, I'd gladly welcome it.

      Delete
    4. I shoot guns frequently at Camp Atterbury Shooting Range and they have never had a case of shoplifting. Lot's of other places can say the same thing, usually smaller establishments. I'm not saying smaller on a national scale but rather in the size of the building.

      When you go into Atterbury you have to give them your drivers license in exchange for range time and you get it back after you pay. You could do something similar but with charge/debit cards where the amount scanned inside the store is automatically deducted and the card returned to you when finished. Also, since all store items are barcoded if they aren't paid for (stuck down in pants or pocket) it would trip an alarm (I've had that done mistakenly at Walmart) that signals the police. Remember, the whole place including the parking lot is video camera'd.

      Nothing is perfect but eliminating the obvious wasteful practices is a step in the right direction.

      Lastly, as a long term business owner I tend to see BOTH sides of the issue whereas you tend to see the consumers side. Keep in mind, consumers aren't forced to do business with any company but if they so choose to they will do so as the company requires.

      Me? Having groady assholes on duty that couldn't care less about their jobs and the customers is a huge turn off and one more reason to not go back. Even if it did cost more, though I haven't seen convincing facts that is would, I'd rather deal with machines than 2 legged animals. (think of the whole store as one big vending machine [look up AutoMat's back in the 30's and 40's] As far as though animals? It's up to them how to make their way, I'm busy full time making mine. And no, I don't advocate gov't assistance for lazy asses or anyone else. It's not their's to give.

      Delete
    5. The issue with the upgraded barcodes, the ones that have the radio wave chip or whatever makes it have an alarm, is the cost per. Even Wal-Mart is ONLY chipping the case, not each item, on all but certain items. Many stores could have all chipped items, but certainly not low profit places like the $ store. If you have a high volume store anyway, it is cheaper to pay someone than chip everything ( at, say, twenty cents each, it takes only one shopping cart full of items to pay the cashier for the full hour ). If the economics were already in robots favor, this would have been done long ago. I'll have to do a little research and see what the chips are going for now-my data is a bit old. Still, the economics of scale that allow Dollar Tree to be able to afford several grand a month store rent also explain why clerks are cheaper.

      Delete
    6. Okay, my initial reading in the late 90's had the cost at 15 cents each, if I recall correctly, but that had been a projection as the industry was just starting. As of 2012 they were 10 cents each. Over a decade and the prices haven't fallen much. So it is probably one that won't decrease unless everyone everywhere started using them. Assume a dime cost. For a thirty item shopping visit, at five minutes a customer, you are already looking at three times the cost in chips compared to even the manager of the place's salary. This only explains the Dollar Tree. If you could shrink the retail space in a vending machine type deal, you could eliminate both chips and worker cost. Vending machines are very popular in high rent Tokyo.

      Delete
    7. “If you can explain how to solve the shoftlifter/vandalizer issue with automation, I'd gladly welcome it.”


      I don’t know the answer to this question either. But somehow Amazon has managed to do so at their new store in the pacific northwest (Forgot the exact city; Seattle, Portland?) Of course I’m sure that there will be staff on hand, but it’s probably limited.

      Oh, and I wouldn’t shoplift from Camp Atterbury Shooting Range either 😲 πŸ˜€

      Delete
    8. I'd think the food store, with high Yuppie Scum cost items, could easily afford both the chips and the guy at the door keeping an eye on things. They are probably selling it as fast in/out rather than saving costs to cut prices. Just guessing-I've ignored most of it.

      Delete
    9. I’m thinking that they wouldn’t even need a guy right at the door, since unless the chip is deactivated, you couldn’t sneak it out. The way that I would set something like this up would be to have a short hallway at every exit. As soon as you enter the hallway you cross the detector. If the detector goes off, the exit door locks, and security is summoned. You could even have the guards quarters situated right off of the exit hall.

      Of course someone will undoubtedly devise a method in which to sneak small items out. Something that blocks or disables radio frequencies.

      Delete
    10. I don't think fire codes would allow the locking doors.

      Delete
    11. So then I take it that there were no fire codes in Germany between the years 1933-1945? Okay, sorry. I realize that was horribly insensitive of me :D

      Delete
    12. They upgraded fire codes afterwards:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire
      :)

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED