HITLARY
Post 1 of 2 today
You would think that the
upcoming election with Hitlary Clinton would be reserved for Slow Doomer Days
as far as reported news/analysis goes.
Alas, you can’t open a dead tree publication or a Browser without the
evil witch being discussed or warned about.
I’d like to talk about why this is mostly much ado about diddly
squat. Don’t get me wrong. I despise the ground she walks on and the
defected human beings who spawned her, nor do I wish to breath from the same
oxygen supply. She is about the only
living person I hate more than ex-wife #2 ( I allow such notables as Janet Reno
a pass since they were stuck down with hideous diseases ). But how fond do you think I am of Obammy or
Schrub? Each in their own way bent me
over and reamed out my rectum until I bled.
How different do you think Hitlary RottenClam Clinton is going to
be? Oh, she’ll impose strict gun
control! Oh, she’ll curtail freedom of
the press! So…how is this different than
any other president in living memory?
*
Bush, hailed as such a
wonderful Republican, did more to curtail our civil liberties than anyone since
another Republican named Lincoln. Gun
control cannot be laid at the feet of Democrats exclusively. Even if it could, when Republicans enter the
White House after such acts, do they ever strike down such un-Constitutional
measures? Of course they don’t. All presidents are usurpers of power ( even
the second best in terms of freedoms-the first being Jackson [ you could make a
fuss about his treatment against Indians and such, but for the common citizens
of the day, the poor and not the Indigs who were NOT citizens, he was the premier
champion ]-Jefferson, felt empowered to sidestep the law to purchase vast
tracts of land ). How is Hitlary going
to be different? She might re-impose the
Clinton Semi-Auto ban, but all you macho militia pukes spinelessly gave in to
her once and will do so again. As long
as you can buy some reasonably effective combat arm you’ll be just fine.
*
Of course, where were you
while Obammy was thundering against paramilitary weapons? I mean, really? You’ve had EIGHT FRIGGIN YEARS to stockpile
semi-auto’s and mags and lots of ammo.
And NOW you think you need to panic?
What are you, soft in the head?
Look, Hitlary has a record for banning guns, I grant you ( and yes, I’m
saying she was the real President, not Bill ).
You could almost be forgiven for believing The First Muslim just might
have left the guns alone. But if I
remember my reading near a decade ago, all of you did in fact say that a
Democrat and a Socialist such as Obammy would in fact ban guns. So, did you not get enough back then? How many AR’s do you think you need? What you need is ammunition. Lots and lots. And food.
Because food can be “banned” a lot easier than guns. You can buy one gun and have it last a
lifetime. Food has a much more limited
utility per unit. I’m not hearing anyone
complain about Midwest drought, GMO’s, high taxes precluding food
independence-not nearly as much as I’m hearing about a gun ban.
*
The first of the month,
Rawles had a short article on how afraid he was of Hitlary and how she would
impose restrictions on blogs ( introducing “hate speech” laws and such ). Sure, Hitlary can and will do almost anything
that is illegal. She has proven that
time and again. I’m certainly not saying
she won’t do a Chinese style Internet control and censorship. She is Evil Incarnate, after all. Yet, I ask myself how hard it would be to
sidestep such actions. What, nobody can
print on paper anymore? Nobody can wait
thirty days for a publication? You can
mail your publication from anywhere, and you don’t even need to use expensive
ink and paper. A mini-CD costs thirty
cents each and can hold thousands of pages of text and should mail for under an
ounce in postage.
*
I’m not saying you’d have
enough subscribers. Folks now seem to
need instant gratification. Waiting
three months for a DVD is too much and so they spend $12 at the movie theatre (
for a more often than not piece of glittery crap ). But will they spend $12 a year for a magazine
subscription? Hell no. They can’t read that every day. And at what point does any of that go from
information to mere entertainment?
Obviously, when your subscribers stay in the single digit percentage of
your online free readers, delayed gratification information is a dying media. But how is moving your server provider overseas
much more than delaying the inevitable for your blog? If your readers won’t pay to read, you are
only entertaining them rather than truly saving them with your wisdom. They will leave you anyway, once Big Brother
is watching.
*
What further mischief can
Hitary get into? Obammy paid off his
handlers by his health care law. How
many people are going to die because his “affordable” care is anything
but? Yet, he was “elected” a second time
even with the threat of screwing up our medical system ( which you kind of need
after uppity negros or trigger happy cops get done with you ). And you think elections are real
anymore? If the candidates are
pre-selected, and a politician of any political party can do as they please, or
do as they are told, ANY president is going to screw us, not just the scary
evil lesbian ones. I said, anyone but
Hitlary. We got Obammy, a Muslim who
sought to spark a race war. Now I’m
saying, again, anyone but Hitlary. And
we could get anything done to us. Voting
doesn’t mean squat anymore. Stop voting
as you only endorse your own imprisonment.
The rich humpers who own us have decided who the puppet president is
going to be, and that person will NOT do as they desire but what their masters
dictate. So it doesn’t matter who is “(s)elected”. The same things in store for us are going to
happen regardless. There could be total
gun control, but not because Hitlary is elected. There could be Internet censorship, but not
because a socialist is in office.
Etcetera. Panic early while you
can do something to fix the problem, then relax.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. IF YOU DON’T SEE
THE AD, DISABLE AD BLOCK ( go to the Ad Blocker while on my page and scroll
down the menu to “disable this site” ). You can purchase anything, not just the
linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other
item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is
placed, I get credit for your purchase. For those that can’t get the
ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or
buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year. Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for mere Book
Money, so do your part.***
*Contact Information* Links To Other Blogs * Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *wal-mart wheat
*Link To All My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
*Contact Information* Links To Other Blogs * Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *wal-mart wheat
*Link To All My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
I disagree with not voting - voting is for either major party is doing an explicit "opt-in" but _not_ voting is *not* an implicit "opt-out" instead it is taken by TPTB as an implicit "opt-in". The only way to vote is to vote 3rd party or blank for most of the races only voting for one so they cant toss out your ballot. The 3rd party and blank votes are the only way TPTB feel the slightest concern about a missing vote. Think back to how the republicans reacted to the Ross Perot movement - and how they responded (contract with America).
ReplyDeleteI want to believe, as it holds out some hope, but I cannot.
DeleteI must vote my conscience, so I will be voting 3rd party.
DeleteNot that I believe Johnson has much of a chance.,.
But my mind will know that I did not vote toward a dead end ? Good enough for me to give it a shot.
Hope- even the thinnest thread of hope is necessary for the mental well being of those facing (nearly) insurmountable challenges. And in this case the hope is that we can give those destroying us the middle finger at least as we go down. Probably wont do any good, but better to flip them off then just hang ones head and accept it.
DeleteWe'll see how well the Libertarian vote turns out. If it is the same or lower than Clintons second term, I know they are fudging the numbers. If better, adjusted for population, I'll consider gaining some hope.
DeleteFWIW, if the internet is killed I'll subscribe to your mag for $12/yr., 'specially if I can get 3 yrs for $20 in advance. I used to be a severe magazine subscriber - maybe 10 paid subscriptions a year, and through my business I received about 30 subscriptions a year for free. Now, I haven't bought any magazine at all in over 10 years.
ReplyDeleteLastly, if guns are banned the only people that will give them up are those in the database. Now, guns should only be bought from private sellers.
Magazines are generally a rip-off. I got a five year sub for a gun mag for $30, and I stick with Shotgun News. No other is worth it ( and I also used to have lots of subs ). I'm thinking on a CD mag-I'm just cautious as it will take a printer investment and I ALWAYS lose money on my business ideas.
DeleteJimbo, if you do a CD magazine you don't need to invest in a printer. Just a Sharpie. "March 2017-issue-guns, wheat and hair care products." We don't need no stinking printed labels!
DeleteActually, the printer is for the envelop address label. I can do sharpie or label maker for the CD but I won't hand write in addresses anymore. I did that in the '90's and never again.
DeleteAgree that these policies and selections are all pre-determined James. Also agree that we have a one party system. That being said, I think that this time around things are going to be much different. Too many massive shootings as of late, and too many commiecrats screaming from the roof tops that “all those right wing nut jobs need to have their guns taken away” so that crime magically goes away :eyeroll: I fully expect our second amendment to take a serious hit this time around.
ReplyDeleteAs far as selection of president, it generally makes no difference from president to president, and as you say, it probably wouldn't have either this time around if it were not for the fact that we will have our first female commander in chief. And if you think that feminism is bad now, you ain't seen nothin yet. The psychological impact of such an event will catapult feminism 50 years into the future. We're talking about a militant feminism, the likes of which no man has ever seen before :shock: Total runaway Orwellian future ahead when the fems, and the feminized males are completely running the show. Also keep in mind that she's going to nominate the most radical supreme court justice that she can find (Probably another Dyke) to the bench, and there goes what little is left of the constitution.
It saddens me to see what a pussified bunch of bastards the males in this country have become that they would ever look up to a woman for leadership. And don't fool yourself, the commiecrats, while weakest with the white male vote, have plenty of that demographic voting for them, and thus purposely voting for their own subjugation. I know, because I know of plenty of these spineless mangina's.
Alas, let us not forget that Trump is a lier-having reversed nearly all his positions-and completely out to help his rich buddies. But, still, better a Mussilinni ( sp ) than a Stalin.
DeleteYes, I'm fully aware of what Trump is all about James. In fact I think it's all a set up, and the Clinton's put him up to it. You had to get someone in there that Hitlery could actually beat.
DeleteThat being said, and in case I'm wrong, there's only one person that I don't want to see in the white house worse than Trump.
Remember, your "natural right" to protect yourself as you see fit is inherent from the time of your birth.
DeleteThe gov't cannot give anyone rights, it can only give privileges.
Notice the wording of the 2nd, "...the right of the...", what right is it speaking of?
Why, the PRE-EXISTING natural right of self protection of course.
Notice also that the 2nd demands that the gov't "...shall not infringe...". In spite of this very clear wording your natural right to self protection is indeed infringed in many ways. In essence the constitution has been violated.
Now, having said all of that, what sane person would give up their natural right to self protection willingly?
Do you want your poison now, or double the dosage later?
So long as we control our own minds, they cannot fully take away our ability to manufacture arms.
DeleteLet them try...they shall fail.
James, good article. For any government to keeps its slaves in check requires the control of media/information and gun control. When it becomes a felony to posses anything more tactical than a single shot shot gun or perhaps a 22 bolt rifle they will have us where they want us. I fear many would turn in their evil black guns to avoid risking a felony. I have no intentions of turning anything in even if I did have scary rifles that where on paper. That's why I have some non-scary firearms to go with my scary ones. I could always have some more ammo put back but where do you draw the line.
ReplyDeleteThe main stream media is already controlled by the government. Even Fox is although they make a few token Non PC reports. Still no meat and potatoes.
James, I'd gladly pay $12-$18 a year for your wisdom on a monthly basis. More depending on the amount of content. At some point consider offering subscriptions if the internet freedoms comes under direct fire.
With everything we are potentially facing as far as threats to freedoms and simple financial survival it is time to buckle down. My personal example involves a large effort to pay off debt and also savings. Not all in cash mind you. I have plenty of guns and ammo and food and gear. Is there still some items i want or need? Sure but I've directed most of my efforts towards economic survival. My debts are a little on a vehicle and land that is privately financed. I'm sitting pretty well i guess compared to many.
As far as gun panics at the last minute? the last one pre-2012 I sold some guns at crazy prices. Felt a little bad about it but sold an AR and some support items for twice what I had into it. Bought some of your recommended firearms.
anyway, that is enough rambling. Love the Hair!
I do wonder myself how bad the gun control will be. Will enough oppose it, violently, if total control is implemented? Should we, as we are so screwed unarmed? Conundrums.
DeleteThey won't be going door to door as they're too cowardly for that.
DeleteEverybody will receive a certified letter in the mail stating that you must turn your firearms and ammo in to the nearest law enforcement establishment and you will receive a tax voucher for $200 for each hand gun, $300 for each shotgun, $400 for each long gun, $100 for any amount of ammo or reloading products.
When you renew any license you will sign a document stating you possess no firearms.
When you enroll your child in a school you will sign that document.
The banks and the state and federal tax collectors will require you to sign that document.
The media will broadcast a message continuously that if you are caught with a firearm or supplies you will be incarcerated at hard labor for a period of no less than 10 years in a federal penitentiary.
The media will also run PSA's that a reward of $1000 will be given to anyone providing direct information that leads to the conviction of all violators of the gun ban. Your family and friends and neighbors will become Quislings and turn your ass in.
In 1 year the entire country will have become completely pussified and all of the honorable patriots will have been exterminated.
Criminals from top to bottom will reign supreme.
Damn. I mean, damn. I don't think I've ever agreed with you so completely. That is actually diabolical in its conception and effectiveness.
DeleteDon't forget the Healthcare angle, got a broke leg? Don't see where you turned in all your contraband firearms, guess you'll just hobble your ass right out of this ER and don't come back without proof you turned them in.
DeleteIt wont be one year- they will ease it on. Each time claiming to be responding to another horrible incident shouted about by the lamestream media. Too fast and they will get every gun owner showing up in front of their workplaces, ready to shoot. But 1 step every couple of months? yes.
DeleteI should do some research and an article on the improvised metal pipe shotgun. Read it first from Saxon, need a refresher on pipe size and other details.
DeleteMy next door neighbor has several made up. He is an ex V. Nam national refuge type dude. I wouldn't doubt that he also has tunnels dug all over the place lol.
DeleteIf'n ya want I'll look his over and report. :-)
Please do. Need extra sources for more info.
DeleteGun control could get bad- real bad, even without door to door confiscation.
ReplyDeleteAn ammo tax is likely in the works, and they are already shutting down a lot of gunsmiths with revisions to certain regulations (if it _could_ be imported/exported it now requires a license to sell even locally costing thousands more and a complicated application).
And the worst part is, if guns are used to resist gun control, they will just make for worse gun control laws...("obviously guns are too dangerous for you all to possess just look at the reactions of these gun owners to 'common sense' legislation!!!")
I think the effect of the gunsmith law will just be consolidation and higher prices, the same as when they bumped up the fees on FFL holders and all the hobby/micro dealers shut down.
DeleteI think Bush II deserves at least damning praise for allowing the Clinton assault weapons / hi cap magazine ban to sunset after being in place for 10 years. Repubs get very little praise thrown to them, and signing in another term would have been very easy for Bush. But he didn't and Americans were again allowed to purchase without Federal law interceding.
ReplyDeleteI think Hillary will push 'hate speech ban' - she's already stated that speech that goes against the grain should be discouraged. See how banning the 2nd Amendment makes it easier for the others to be 'reconsidered' ?
Thanks for the post sir.
If we are rewarding Shrub for, in essence, doing nothing, I suggest we reward all unemployed ghetto mothers for NOT getting pregnant. All released criminals for NOT committing more crimes. Etc. I'd like a reward for not getting up and going to work. Kidding aside, I thought of the sunset ban when writing the section on Repub's and I didn't think it violated the trend.
DeleteI certainly would sign up for your magazine. I figure at the very least, that much I owe you ! Along with the many others which gave anonymously. Those I cannot directly reimburse, tho can rely on you to let me know, if help is needed.
ReplyDeleteNo worries if Hitlery tries banning our saintly manhood. Enough will have sacks of big brass, to donate toward her efforts. One piece of lead at a time...
Big trouble in Amerika if she tries this.
No need to think you owe me-you've done PLENTY already. And I did our of selfishness anyway-I might need that karmic balance in my favor one day :)
Delete"out of", not "our of". Sorry.
DeleteYes, perhaps so...
DeleteYet in my Karmic universe, I believe in paying forward much more than received :-)
“I should do some research and an article on the improvised metal pipe shotgun. Read it first from Saxon, need a refresher on pipe size and other details.”
ReplyDeleteThat's a good idea James. But as you've mentioned before, ammo is the real bottleneck here. Still, it's not a bad idea to have the knowledge to fashion your own weapon. It helps to be creative and think outside of the box. Maybe some kind of variation that doesn't rely on conventional ammo. As a sort of example, a variation on the old potato shooting guns that used a butane lighter for the fuel and igniter to launch the spud. But of course I'm not talking about launching a spud here. Also remember Saxon's arrow launched “do dads” (I'm being vague on purpose, but I suspect that you know full well what I'm talking about). Rambo used them, as well as Arnold in Predator, to great effectiveness.
I'm back to concentrating on primitive archery again. To be honest, I am pretty scared about the upcoming election results. Never before has the country been so divided, and the political atmosphere, in combination with the indoctrinated masses, has created the perfect environment for some serious Orwellian gun control measures, and hate speech laws to pass.
I'm actually seriously considering going into full nomad mode, and heading off into the wilderness with nothing more than a pack, and doing the John Muir thing. I've been wanting to do this for a few years now. I'm not talking about full on wilderness survival. I still have the Elko land, and that will be home base, and a cache store. But other than occasional resupply runs, I wish to stay away from the police state as much as possible. Things are going to get really ugly in the next few years, and I want no part of it.
I like your nomad idea. Elko is such a huge land area lost hiker bodies don't get found for decades. You could easily get lost in your AOO. I did post a note for Wed. article relating to her election, which I think is good news. My shotgun improvised has more to do with evading gun control, when being too poor to buy a private sale conventional firearm. It is understood anyone can afford to stash a few boxes of shotty shells for them.
Delete