darwin and malthus list

DARWIN AND MALTHUS LIST

So, here is Darwin and Malthus, two wild and crazy swinging guys, sitting down for a beer after a hard days work trying to convince people they are idiots ( for their own good, of course! Well, plus, it's a little bit amusing ), and they decide that it is past time to make a list of folks who are hosed in the coming Post Oil Dark Age ( remember PODA? I don't think I've used it for years ). Now, without getting into the whole probabilities discussion, keep in mind these are just folks with a target on their back.

*

That doesn't mean all of them will die. It doesn't mean that if you are not on the list you are safe. It doesn't take into account luck good or bad. It just means your odds are far worse. Two things to keep in the forefront of your pea brain. One, WAY way more folks are going to die than is indicated by the remaining resources. The cycle is, we overpopulate and then mostly completely die off and then start all over again. In the case of the reindeer on the island, and the yeast in the vat, EVERYONE died off.

*

Humans will of course survive, because we are not limited to a niche food source ( either are cockroaches, our buddies in survival ) or climate. NOT having fur is handier than you think. The only question is if it will be a bottleneck event or not ( and for all you whiners out there screeching like castrated feces flinging chimps about Gore Warming, please and thank you shut the hump up. No one wants to hear your communism disguised as compassion. Man has been ruining his habitat long before coal or oil. And Mother Nature will destroy man far quicker than the converse ).

*

And two, because far more people MUST die than necessary, which is a survival mechanism so as to bring surplus back for a healthier remaining much smaller population, there will be absolutely nothing fair about the die-off. The smartest people will die and most ruthless retards will survive ( another survival trait is people get more stupid, except in surplus resource times. Smart people don't breed, and the dynamic is Breed To Succeed-until it kills you ). It ain't fair, but numbers matter.

*

You will see very smart people try to convince you that the more intelligent the species the better off we will be. Stupid smart people! They will also tell you that we can voluntarily breed less and gradually reduce the population without war or famine. Yeah, nice friggin plan there, egghead. Stupid people are going to outbreed you and replace you. Look at California if you are confused. For tribe survival, he who starves last wins, and the more farmers, soldiers and breeders you have the better your odds are of displacing the other tribe.

*

Rapid overpopulation wins, in a surplus state. In a shrinking resource state, the selection process MUST be brutal, quick and unfair. Your tribe has one chance of surviving, and that is by being ruthless. That means if there is ANYTHING at all wrong with you, goodbye, you are the weakest link. Who are the worthless eaters that we do NOT need to survive? And you will find that while the selection process can be petty, it is also in line with biology. For instance, all the ugly bitches are on the list. This isn't just cosmetic. What we have come to accept as “beauty” actually covers good health and good genes.

*

It is easy to be fat and female, especially when you are in poor health ( gals are just built to store fat. Sorry. That is the price of carrying a fetus and nursing a baby ). It is a lot harder to be fat on JUST the bumper and fender, if you know what I mean. Too skinny and you cannot breed, too fat and you die of health complications. You have to be in the optimal range. And guys really like that range. That is what is sexually attractive.

*

If you are NOT sexually attractive, in scarcity times you will be voted off the island. You think guys are just thinking with their dingus, which is true, but a side effect is that only the most fit females for breeding are allowed to replenish the gene pool. And the same goes for males, in a giant Trial By Combat. Only the fittest and most cunning ( which means it isn't JUST the youngest ) are allowed to keep eating and breeding. And the winnowing process there is even faster than with females, because you need far less males to remain viable.

*

Which means, my friends, if you are over about 45 years of age, even in good health, you are most likely going to pick a short straw. Hermitage is much healthier for you than a tribe. You can't store enough food to keep everyone happy enough to allow you to live very long. Even a group of older folks will, if the food starts running out, start picking winners and losers. As you might imagine, the losers are not given a vote. At the very least, have a buried cache hermitage as a back up if you are in a tribe.

*

Remember how I keep telling you that humans justify bad behavior ( and some of the worst are religious types, just saying )? In a situation where your group starts to see a diminishing food supply, you WILL see very shortly justifying behavior ahead of time. If a older female is going to be discriminated against, the other guys and gals will start “inventing” group rule infractions. As in, they convince themselves, subconsciously mind you because nobody is ever evil in their own mind-Hitler was saving the targeted German race from evil foreigners and domestic fifth columnists, that the target is “up to no good”, or “is acting funny”, or “is not cooperating ( to their illogical demands )” or something similar.

*

I know you don't believe me, because you are a saint and would never do that, but I suggest that you rewind your life and take a better look. How many relationships that you knew weren't going to work did you sabotage? Perhaps by focusing on a minor irritation that you let slide before. Then, you get the other person to leave, and you are the blameless victim. You know you justified it. “Oh, she is going to be a big problem later”. “Well, why isn't she even trying? I sure am”. “Why is she such a bitch?”.

*

Now apply that on a group level, and remember it is actually about food and starvation rather than compatibility this time. Of COURSE people are going to invent poor behavior on others part to justify their own bad behavior ( like running someone out to die ). Females STILL act like that in good times, and guys still listen to their wives about who is socially acceptable. In the future, being socially unacceptable means you have probably been handed a death sentence.

*

Continued tomorrow.

( .Y. )

( today's related Amazon link click HERE )

*

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).

*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.

*** Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there