casper and democrats 3

CASPER AND DEMOCRATS 3

Okay, we covered the beginning of the decline of racism and centralized government.  Racism is a centralizing concept, above nationalism.  Globalism is taking centralization far too far.  Democracy simply doesn’t work because it is a feminized form of governance, one based on emotionalism.  It is also never really used beyond propaganda.  If the rubes think they have a say, they will remain passive.  Democracy was also a great way force equality, which is how you disenfranchise the productive members of society ( hence controlling them for your profit ).  In Bisonia, commies AND Democrats will be bayoneted.

*

( Here is a fun filled fact.  In 1918, there was a communist civil war in Finland. Yeah, the Nordic country.  Finland wanted its independence from Russia-prior it just had autonomy-and since being Red was the new popular kids thing, the commies wanted the new government molded in their image.  The Whites threw most of them in concentration camps where they died.  As a percentage of population, it wasn’t until Rwanda that a country saw such a death count in such a short period of time.  From Jared Diamond’s new book-which is marginal )

*

But more importantly, democracy is NOT how you run a tribe.  A tribe has more equalitarianism, but the best warrior needs to be in charge, for the tribes survival ( with former great warriors acting as a council ).  If every stupid dumb bitch ( “but war is icky!” ) and young inexperienced buck ( “attack everyone!”, or even worse “Big Boob Bertha says I should give peace a chance” ) was allowed a say in matters, the tribe would NOT survive all that much longer.  Most people are retarded, and the young and emotional make retards look smart.

*

Let’s switch over to national armies versus guerrillas.  Back in the day, guerrillas were actually quite successful against conventional armies.  And a large reason for that was that their victory benefited one of the Cold War superpowers.  Today, there are no more superpowers ( no, Spanky, the US is no longer a global hegemon.  Not militarily and certainly not economically.  Neither is China.  One of the side effects of switching from conventional oil to Fake Fuels is the inability to control the energy supply as well as one used to.  The supply is both more diffuse and easier to disrupt.  This weakens conventional militaries ).

*

And guerrillas are now, without as much assistance, becoming more successful.  The decentralizing trend in energy and military might ( is not a missile defeating an aircraft carrier a weakening of centralized power? ).  As political power goes from centralized to decentralized ( the states more often able to flaunt the Fed’s dictates.  Just because the Federales want the same thing is not why this is happening.  The Feds know better than to set such dangerous precedents ), as energy availability shrinks, long distance and protracted anti-guerrilla campaigns become more problematic.  Afghanistan is NOT successful.

*

And I don’t mean because that country is the graveyard of empires.  Which it is.  Nobody is going to completely take over the country ( not even the Taliban ).  No one expected us to, from the beginning.  Unless it was some Army officers.  But they are dumb asses to begin with.  The problem is that we are trying less, spending more, and slowing losing ground.  It started as grand strategy and has degraded into Military Industrial Complex corporate welfare.  It is a defeat because that is how the rest of the world sees it.  Stupid is as stupid does.

*

Will nation states continue to defeat local guerrillas?  Sure.  What is happening now is that empires are not able to defeat guerrillas in colonies.  Local guerrillas against local governments don’t have that long logistics tail to defeat.  But of course, soon enough, as the world shrinks, then yes, guerrillas will become more successful as nations shrink to more manageable and natural sizes.  Somethings, a region will get independence even if it doesn’t want to.  One wonders how much longer England will care to subsidize Scotland, for instance ( which is only fitting, historical pay-back for exporting Scots and settling sheep ).

*

What about urbanization?  This isn’t actually a centralizing trend, but the opposite.  You’ll notice this more, the poorer a country it is.  This is due to lack of resources.  Granted, the trend started from colonializing agricultural countries.  Land was taken from peasants, the peasants went to the city if being in poverty there was an improvement from illegally slash and burning wilderness areas for sustenance crops.  But besides economics, another basic reason remains resource availability.  It takes less profit to support a robotized operation than to use human labor.  The further away from the city this is, the more expensive.

*

Squeezing profits from shrinking energy and resources, machines have been turned farmer and people are encouraged to move to the city.  It takes less to support them in urban areas than far away rural areas.  It is cheaper to run a rail line out into the jungle than to provide villages full of workers, with the food imports ( the land is for commodities only ) and sewage and schools and police.  In the cities, you can leave people to rot in poverty, allowing gangs to police them at no state cost.  And no one can sabotage the farm or mine machines.

*

Where is the worst depopulation and economic decline rurally in the US?  The grain growing Midwest.  I can only conclude this was deliberate, as a social engineered method of food control.  The robots farm, the populace is safety jailed in urban poverty where if they revolt, food will not be available to them.  Food Stamps aren’t a generosity.  They are further population control-one of the cheapest available.  Centralized farms do NOT always produce more grain per acre, but a lot of times less.  At higher resource cost per bushel.  But overall, robot farming uses less resources per person.

*

What looks like population centralizing is merely decreased energy use for an expanding population.  Remember, and never forget, that the per capita total energy use globally peaked in 1979.  That is all energy, from nuclear which is running out of uranium, to hydro with silted up dams ( and sometimes falling water levels ), as well as oil.  The BTU’s per person have been falling.  Falling energy leads to less complex, less energy hungry organizations.  Decentralization.  Whenever you are confused about the direction of the future, merely think “decentralization”.  That is all.

( .Y. )

( today's related Amazon link click here )

*

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).
*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there