GUEST ARTICLE
( note from Jim: yesterday's article on canning butter has been amended. Idaho Homesteader raised valid safety concerns. Read her comment at the article )
Hope is seldom more than a sliver as the stage
darkens.
But there may always be a sliver of hope even if
it is just hope of being able to say you were right at the very end- but I
doubt the ‘very end’ will give any of us the final word, not in the face of
current predicaments. Because I doubt current predicaments will kill off the
whole race. Maybe 99% of the race, but even 1% of 10 billion is still 100
million. And I doubt that we will fall below .01% which is still more than an
order of magnitude greater than the last close call with extinction that we
nearly reached in prehistory.
Here is my rationale -
No single factor of industrial civilization
collapse, especially in a stair step style collapse, will cause the extinction
of the human species. At least absent deliberate attempt and racial suicide
including themselves by some nation ruling elite. There may only be
thousands of our race left, but some are likely to survive. Most ruling elite
have no more desire to commit suicide than most of us (probably less). Ipso
Facto human extinction from human causes is very unlikely. Massive depopulation
because of human stupidity and overshoot, is on the other hand, VERY likely in
the near to moderate run (decades to centuries) but depopulation is not
extinction unless it reaches 100%.
Some of the human extinction threats that are
overblown:
Radiation - less of threat than most people
think. Plenty of people near Hiroshima, Chernobyl, etc., lived long enough to
have kids, grandkids, and even great grandkids. Sure lives were shorter and
less healthy, and birth defects increased, but nothing that humans can’t deal
with. Also the most dangerous radiations are time and place limited -a few
hundred years and our descendants will be able to live only dozens of miles
from the worst effected spots – unhealthy with lots of birth defects and dying
of cancer at 40 perhaps, but still living long enough to procreate.
Chemical pollutions - Probably more of a real
threat than radiation and possibly a longer lived threat, but just as with
radiation, the threat is not an extinction level concern without deliberate
assistance from human beings.
Biological agents - Disease is much more a
threat to human extinction but there are plenty of small tribes scattered over
the world that only have very intermittent contact with the rest of the world,
tribes in tropical jungles and tundra herdsmen, etc. Unless humans are again, deliberately
spreading plague to everyone,
plague won’t get to everyone until it begins evolving to less deadly
strains.
Climate change – Humans survived ice ages and
life has survived all but the worst of the maximum forecast temperature
increase, humans have lived in almost every biome with the most primitive of
technologies, why should that change? Sure billions will die in a worst case
scenario – but we have a population of billions, it only takes a few tens of
thousands to have the necessary genetic diversity to prevent outright
extinction (and modern transport has helped increase genetic diversity
massively in every corner of the globe). Probably another miserable existence
as compared to our current luxury but not extinction causing.
Starvation – come on, same issue as any of the
above, there are little scattered pockets of humans who live mostly/completely
off the locally available resources. And at an extreme, human will prey upon
other humans aka: long pork, soylent green, etc. so there will be survivors up
until the natural biome has had a decently long while to re-adjust to whatever
conditions caused the initial starvation – and humans will be adapting to eat
whatever is available, even if it is merely lichens, cockroaches and rats.
And once any one aspect of industrial
civilization collapse has trimmed a significant proportion of the excess
population it makes the pressures of other human extinction events exacerbated
by our population overshoot that much less likely and less proportionately
severe.
In my judgement the human race will survive as
long as vertebra life on earth can survive short of deliberate suicide by EVERYONE. 7 of the 8 continents, and
many, many, islands of the planet have a self-sustaining year round population
of humans, and Antarctica may become nominally habitable due to climate change.
A few extreme acts of nature beyond human
control (such as major astronomical events) might destroy mammalian life on
earth, but short of that human extinction is unlikely.
If I am wrong I will pay out enough that you can
bury my body. Oooh, but if you are burying my body then you are still alive and
I haven’t yet been proven wrong….
Which brings up a good point, acceptance of the
possibility of one’s own demise should not mean that one behaves unnecessarily
suicidal; the same is true for the extinction of your tribe or species. One
should do ones best to preserve the best and most important parts one can in
every case, and prepare to do so no matter what.
So what is good or worthwhile about you? What
about your family, friends, community, nation, civilization, species, kingdom,
phylum, etc.? Is there nothing worth saving at any of those levels? If you
can’t see anything at any of those levels worth saving, I admit that it might
be best for you as an individual to remove your contribution and self from our
world and recycle the nutrients in your body back to nature. But if there
is anything worthwhile at any of those levels that CAN be saved against
any sort of future you can envision then you should dedicate yourself to saving
those worthwhile things. I think I, my family, my friends, my communities, my
nation, this civilization, and our species all have some worthwhile things that
make them worth saving – so I work to provide the best chance possible for each
of these worthwhile things that I can provide in various ways. Despairing will
only excuse a lack of attempt.
End article.
I am way less concerned about the extinction of the human race than I am of the human me. I'm funny that way.
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't mind a population the same as 20k years ago-trade for yummy wheat kind of being nice.
DeleteI suspect that everyone on this blog believes *something* wicked comes this way. What that something is is anyone's guess. Heck, it could be multiple things from multiple directions (that'd be a sucky day).
ReplyDeleteBest we can do is build a bunker in the mountains and.... sorry wrong blog :-P
Best we can do is follow the Bison Plan the best we can. I can't follow the whole plan due to familial pressure. Them's the breaks but I'm a whole lot better prepped following the parts I can follow than if I tried Yuppie Prep plan and gave up because of financial pressures.
END
I suspect all of us have drank the Kool-Aid. Folks don't stop by for my charming personality.
DeleteTechnically, someone can be burying your body after you are proven wrong: all that is required for human extinction is that all females (or all males) die, then it is just a matter of time. Especially if all females go... let's face it, we might be able to come up with a way to clone humans, but we'll never get a man to withstand pregnancy.
ReplyDeleteNah, that would just pressure the men to invent and use artificial wombs or other gestation wombs (maybe other primates, or failing that cows, pigs, sheep, any other species that has mammalian females available). And since it is MALES that are the genetic outlier it would be easier to make females.
DeleteHeck it might even prove out that Chimps and Bonobos are close enough related, DNA seems to indicate that neanderthal were... So as long as SOME ONE, somewhere is willing to work hard enough to create a child, the human species is likely to continue. And as long as people have fun trying they will keep trying.