ARSENAL AMMO AMOUNT
The amount of ammunition
one should acquire for collapse purposes is, like a lot of things, pretty
arbitrary. I live in a small dwelling (
400 square feet ) and think of it as almost too big for two people. You might think that you need that much space
merely for the first child. They used to
have a standard of 900 square feet for a average size family but now the
pampered puke Yuppie Scum turn their nose up at anything under three thousand
square feet ( because, you know, what with the fracking miracle and all, cheap
natural gas will be available to keep it heated pretty much forever-which is
another arbitrary standard. I get way
too hot after 63 degrees, but others insist on seventies plus ). The size of the “ideal” arsenal is
arbitrary. I think three guns, four at
the most ( 30 cal, 357 pistol, forever gun.
At most, 30 cal, large caliber pistol, forever gun pistol, forever gun
rifle ) is all you will ever need, but I’d get shouted down by shotgun lovers,
carbine commandoes, etc. No answer is
100% correct, because of everyone’s differing arbitrary standards.
*
All you can do is give the
reasons for your standards and hope they make sense to other people, at which
point the men will enviously aspire to be just like you and the ladies will
throw their panties at you in a desperate bid to carry your children. Actually, that probably wouldn’t happen with
me, since the species couldn’t handle that kind of evolutionary exponential
hurdle upwards, so I’m safe from fanatical fans out there. Now, we’ve all read differences of opinion on
the amounts of ammo which are ideal. The
semi-auto crowd speaks of hundreds of rounds as a combat load, seemingly taking
their numbers from the Vietnam conflict where the cannon fodder humped at a
minimum half their body weight through humid jungle as both Charles and the
General were amazed-simply amazed I tells ya!- how easy it was to find the
lumbering body of infantrymen. This was
the police action ( you can’t lose a war if you don’t call it one ) that
included the statistic of twenty thousand rounds per casualty ( and that was
with inflated body count numbers ).
*
In that conflict,
ammunition expenditure were actually a good thing. Nothing stimulates the economy in a
plummeting EROI environment like a good military action where everyone is
trained to dump as much lead downrange as humanly possible. Actually, as Inhumanly possible, given the
weight the grunt were expected to carry.
Hell, introduce a new carbine and round just so we can manufacture more
ammo! And the guys can carry twice the
rounds! MORE!!! MORE AMMO!!!!! A hundred years previously, the Army thought
a seven round lever action would bankrupt the Union and cause logistical
nightmares, but later at the end of the very short lived ( call it fifty years
) Cheap Oil Age, you couldn’t waste
enough ammo. Electric Gatling guns,
anyone? Today, because the military is
even more moronic then back in Vietnam ( if I was a bookie and placing odds on
who was more retarded, CEO’s or Generals, I’d have a hard time deciding ), they
learned nothing and still use infantry armed with submachineguns to act as
tripwires for artillery ( to include air and naval arty ) strikes. The only reason we can afford the ammo usage
is because there are so many fewer grunts and airships and navy platforms now.
*
I’ve been talking about
Peak Ore for some time, but nobody wants to listen. They pretend that Obammy had everything to do
with ammo shortages, rather than copper supply decline ( I shan’t get into the
arguments again as I’ve beaten that dead horse flatter than a pancake ). If you don’t want to believe we live on a
finite planet, that ExxonMobile is the only reason oil isn’t gushing from the
ground, I can’t stop you from investing in AR and Berretta arsenals with the
corresponding tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition. Because that is what you will need if you
plan on firing three or four hundred rounds of ammo every enemy encounter (
almost every post-apocalypse fan boy fantasy novel, every crapping one a
rip-off of ‘80’s pulp series, just with more Jesus Freak families involved for
that more wholesome collapse, describes semi-auto’s just as their Yuppie Scum
hero’s do- self animating objects capable of saving the least tactically
talented from themselves. Few bother
with the logistics of re-supply. Sure, “pallet
deep” is a plan after all, if you happen to have the advertising dollars of
companies selling FLIR scopes and freeze dried testicles. For the rest of us on a budget, however… ).
*
Now, it is very easy at
this point to short circuit the argument and proclaim that nobody is going to
survive too many contacts with the enemy and too much ammunition isn’t even
needed. On the face of it, this is true,
but it also ignores the horrendous marksmenship of pretty much everybody. The idiot brigade that styles themselves part
of the Ninja Seal Team will of course blather on about “one shot, one kill”,
but historical reality says that is blatant mythos bullspit. Germans in WWII, who as a group both
practiced for and practiced in combat aimed fire ( Americans might have trained
as such but once on the battlefield were required to spray and pray-and they
didn’t even get enough training to embed the marksmen ideal ), had their
snipers, combat vets, at short urban ranges seeing a more realistic three shots
minimum per casualty. Unless you are
fighting at the thirty yard Rhodesian Study Standard ( obviously there were
prior studies, hence the 1940’s Soviet
adaptation of the 7.62x39, but the Brit colony study is what is referenced to “prove“
average conflict distances ), dumping your two hundred round combat load along
with your team, in effect pushing a wall of lead at an enemy, your chances of
hitting much are pretty low.
*
Which means both that you
need a lot of ammo and that you might last longer than you think after the
Apocalypse ( at least gunshot wise.
Disease and et al is a different matter ). You don’t need a lot of ammo because you have
a semi ( please! Don’t have a semi
unless you use it at a distance in a mid range sniper role and take your time
firing it. The semi feature should not
to used as a spraying device but a means to avoid manually rechambering a round
and perhaps as a recoil buffering device for the older and/or prettier shooters
). You need lots of ammo because you can’t
hit dingus and you’ll be around awhile and need protection. More tomorrow.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. IF YOU DON’T SEE
THE AD, DISABLE AD BLOCK ( go to the Ad Blocker while on my page and scroll
down the menu to “disable this site” ). You can purchase anything, not just the
linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other
item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is
placed, I get credit for your purchase. For those that can’t get the
ads because they are blocked by your software, just mail a Greenback occasionally
or buy some of my books. Pay your
author-no one works for free. I’m nice
enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** *Contact Information* Links
To Other Blogs * Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *wal-mart
wheat*Link To All
My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
Don't get a fire arm as a self defense platform unless you have/can get the ammo to feed it. If the firearm is just a toy, that's fine, it is probably a more useful toy than the latest electronic doo-dad, and with better resale value.
ReplyDeleteHow many rounds you need cant be debated - you need enough ammo that you have some left over when you finally die.
That exact number of course depends on your life expectancy and post collapse scenario you find yourself in.
I live in a place where I can easily afford enough ammo for everyone in the county to receive 1-3 of the bullets (one way of another). Personally I think that is a good way to estimate how many bullets you will need - choose some shot to casualty ratio, and then figure out the number of people within walking distance of your personal alamo. Persons X Casualty ratio = # of bullets needed + fudge factor.
Obviously the more populace a place has, the more fire fights you are apt to suffer through and thus the more ammo you are going to need.
I like your math. Which is why I know I'm double dog dicked post collapse unless most of the locals leave while there is still gasoline. Just too many folks here, even for a rural town.
DeleteYes, I always refer to my semi's as self loading. Also picture each round as a shiny half dollar even if I only have .25 in them.
ReplyDelete"only" of course still adds up real quickly. I added ammo over 17 years and it still hurt bad at 33 cents to seventy five cents each.
DeleteThere was a time when my collection of 7.62x51 was Buck-Buck-Buck TwennyBucks a mag. TG, it has not gone to $5 per bang, but depreciated down to $10/mag. Now, I need to get a paying gig to refill the ammo boxes. This is the advantage of 5.56 at .29 each or .32 for green tip. -pdxr13
DeleteExcept when thirty cents turns into sixty because you need to double tap that Skinny to bring him down.
DeleteOh, yeah. We are importing Skinnies for the upcoming festivities.
DeleteAlong with all others for a correct diversity.
DeleteLike everybody else I have my own views on ammo but like everybody else they are boring.
ReplyDeleteHere some more original ideas, because Guns & Ammo is the butter & bread of survivalist blogs (to pretend otherwise is to pretend you used to buy Playboy to read the articles LOL)
Original idea one : your caliber is a business card. if you use semi-auto ammo like 9x19, 40 S&W or .223/5,56x45 then people will think you have lots and lots of ammo because A. You were prepared (unlike 90% of the population with some income) and B. You chose wasteful weapon platforms, because those calibers exist almost only for semi-autos.
(This attracts the wrong kind of attention)
Original idea number two : You must choose a caliber that allows you to reuse both powder and bullets. This is actually a hidden-dumb idea, but yeah : you may find leftover ammunition with no gun to fire it. Option 1 : most ammo around is .30 and .30-30 is the most forgiving .30 ammo in terms of gunpowder - you don't have to shoot that fast a bullet (whereas .308 starts to get picky because it wants to go fat) Option 2 : you can paper patch odd-caliber bullets, for this you'll have to use either your .30-30 (antyhing below 7,62 within reason) or a .38 (most forgiving powder round in 9mm).
Original idea number three : large rounds are too greedy in lead, and thus are impractical for logistic reasons, but small rounds like .224 are greedy in speed to make up for their tiny size, and speed uses up barrels, has rifling that suck for cast lead bullets and often needs special powders. So you need intermediate, forgiving cartridges, like .38 and .30-30
Excellent-not something I had really considered.
DeleteAgree with your thought on .22-.25 as too small/too-critical on powder & barrels. Cartridge like .220 Swift exemplifies the type. Don't agree on lead being expensive. .45 Colt and .45/70 are excellent 19th century cartridges. Both are candidates as "forever" arms, esp. with some stockpiling and modern bits (stainless, sturdy plastic stock). -pdxr13
DeleteLead won't be as much expensive as hard to scrounge.
DeleteNot the main point of your article, but I think there is a lot to be said for making the distinction between living space and storage space. Off the grid, keeping climate controlled in living space is a major challenge, so you definitely want to keep it small. Having plenty of storage space that is not actively heated or cooled can be useful, however. Depending on your climate, you may even want to divide your living space into warm and cool areas.
ReplyDeleteNo, good point. The grid won't be running so have your ammo well sealed.
DeleteMarksmanship folks. Col. Jeff Cooper (iirc) was the person who stated that if every soldier could kill 10 of the enemy, the war would be won (no military can take that mortality rate and win).
ReplyDeleteMake every shot count - spray and pray will not cut it.
Ave - some good thinking there Pard. The .32 caliber revolver used to be very popular in the 19th Century because of those thoughts. Not too much or too little - just right. Much the same thought for the .410 and FOOD FORAGING. Most game will be shot at when at rest, running shots be damned. The high amount of shot will ruin more meat when shot at standing / perched game. This is definitely a reloading situation with .410 - factory ammo cost is way over the top.
I bought a box of 410 for my "gun control homemade pipe gun". Could almost have bought a box of 30 cal brass ammo at that price. WTF?
DeleteJames, you might want to make your own .410 cartrdiges : 7,62x54R steel ammo or some other large rimmed cartridge for the rim (broken .303 British maybe ? Russian 7,62 has some thick and weirdly shaped butt), and paper/cardboard for the shell itself, with some epoxy at the bottom.
DeleteTh experiement would cost you very little and would benefit us all. I had such an idea in mind myself but nothing came of it, and now that's I'm somewhat crippled I will never resume. But I did some brainstorming on that, perhaps people elsewhere ont e internet have ventured into this.
Tghe advantage of this solution is that you can use standard primers instead of shotgun ones.
Well, it sounds good but don't hold your breath. It took me like six months to finally stop in at the hardware store to get a piece of pipe ( Home Despot doesn't carry the size-I had to go to Ace ) and then longer for a box of shells. But it is something to put on my list of Ta Do's. I have blank 303's-those might be just the ticket for practice.
Delete