calorie fuel 2

CALORIE FUEL 2

The two primary calorie studies were the Nazi’s studying Jewish slave labor and the American Fascists duplicating that study with “volunteers” ( conscientious objectors ).  Sometimes I got the feeling that our study was really just ripping off the German study, but not admitting it.  That could have simply been camouflage to hide Operation Paperclip.  You know, national security as the Cold War commenced.  At first blush, these studies seem benign.  After all, the Nazi’ wanted correct information.  How long can we keep our laborers alive, to determine how many calories to feed our “machines”?

*

The problem is of course that the victor wrote the history books.  Was this REALLY why the Germans actually conducted the test? Was there actually a test, or did we do our own test, then claim there was an evil Nazi test?  I’ll remind you that there are far more questions about the Holocaust than the powers that be want to admit, or even allow you to ask about ( sorry, but if you criminalize questioning the official narrative, I automatically do so because the truth shouldn’t need defending ).  Was the starvation experiments just another false flag story, like the human lampshade stories?

*

Did we get the calorie figures from evil Japanese experiments, yet couldn’t admit it ( Top Secret national security sources )?  Or, would admitting it disclose our complicity in not rescuing our POW’s or something similar?  You have to keep in mind that American Fascism and German Fascism is close to the same thing.  One of the few differences is that they had a national bank run for and by the government and our bank is Rothschild’s run.  There is a BIG difference.  Economically.  But not too much politically.  In both, citizens give their life at the whim of the state, for the security of the state. 

*

But both need the consent of the people, as does any type of political system.  The government is better served keeping its iron fist covered in velvet.  All the above seem like silly little paranoid dramas, but you have to look at them in the context of the time they were created.  We have to question the validity of the tests, because too much was cloaked in politics and secrecy and propaganda.  Motives are questionable.  But even if everything was above board, if the American-centric view is correct, can we trust Evil Nazi Scientists to be free of anti-Juden bias?

*

As I said, there seems to be little to be gained by falsifying data.  The Germans benefited by knowing the exact number of calories they needed to keep a laborer alive ( I don’t believe the Nazi’s had the excess energy to waste on Jewish extermination, just for its own sake.  It misappropriated vital wartime resources.  But to kill them off as slave labor?  That I can buy ).  It helped determine troop rations, as a for instance.  But the fact that the figures don’t work today needs explaining.

*

Either there was a reason for data being wrong, or the Germans just screwed up the experiments.  Today, we know that the numbers are highly suspect.  A 100 pound women can survive without health issues on far below 1500 calories a day.  Some males of equal weight but different body types need more calories or less for the same work.  Different kinds of calories outperform or underperform others.  Some people have a problem eating beef, others get a much better performance on the same amount of calories from beef than from chicken.  Some people thrive on vegetarianism or lacto-vegetarianism.

*

Not all pregnant women conceive on the same diet or body fat ratio.  I suspect that the Nazi experiments, assuming they happened, were simply rushed.  And they were based on rudimentary early knowledge.  That data could have been flawed.  The Germans were really advanced in some areas but not in others.  Despite having a system designed to produce innovation, there was also only so many resources available for so many things to be done.  All figures by definition are suspect.  That said, having no other data, we can use them to some positive effect.

*

They are, again, useful guidelines.  When I pass on the 1500 calories a day figure as a base survival diet, you have to understand that not all bodies are exactly the same ( another issues that comes into effect is the century plus long feminist/communist quest to deny biology and discount gender and race differences, skewing all studies.  Some races did evolve into different bodies biased towards local foods.  Men build muscle but women build fat-those differences are ignored but shouldn’t be ).  Skinny women and kids MIGHT not need as many calories.  Or, at other times, they might. 

*

Some body types need three thousand calories for hard labor, others only two thousand.  You need less calories in meat than if in grains.  Grains and dairy perform better than beans and grains, and the caloric values might be different.  A potato and meat diet will act differently than a meat and grain one.  Some body types need less pregnancy calories than others.   Variables out the wazoo, so, yes, when you try to generalize you are in effect setting yourself up for some failures.  The best thing to do would be to experiment on yourself.  Then change your survival stockpile accordingly.

*

No one wants to hear that. They want to read, “two MRE’s a day keeps you combat effective”.  But the calorie figures I tell you are merely One Size Fits All generalized numbers.  Hell, they don’t even fit ME.  I can do heavy labor on as little as two thousand calories, but that has to be heavy on oil and whole grain ( which is why I’m comfortable stocking butter rather than meat ).  I give the figure of three thousand calories a day for sustained combat.  Most historical data supports that ( rations ideally were a pound of meat and two of bread for many armies ).

*

That figure might be high or low for you personally.  You might need a smidge more than 1500 calories a day, just sitting around.  But it is close enough to include everyone.  Your body, if optimally run ( exercise, hydrated, only whole foods ), will have its own figure ( don’t forget to factor in the calorie dampening effect of living in climate control ).  I wish it were simpler.  I wish there were absolutes.  But like most other things in life, always apply healthy doses of skepticism to “common wisdom”. 

( .Y. )

( today's related Amazon link click here )

*

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).
*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there