daily ad

Thursday, June 22, 2017

not an animal


NOT AN ANIMAL

It’s not an animal, it’s an abortion ( thank you, sex pistols, really the only good punk rock group out there-if you don’t kill yourself early in life you never had enough true angst to be a great rocker )!  Back in the day, on the James M Dakin blog which nobody reads because nobody visits my web site, which is okay since it is only there in case Blogger tells me they are tired of making money off of me and give me the boot, but please note its address for such an eventuality ( www.bisonprepper.com  ), I wrote a really well thought out rational piece of abortions, titled “A dingo aborted my baby” ( I must have been having a good day ).  I can’t really add anything to it or improve on it all that much, but I thought it was worth a revisit.  Birth control is more than something that gets FemiNazi’s all worked up and foaming at the mouth, it also ties in with population.  I concentrated a bit on the infanticide aspects, which is also pertinent to survivalism, but I think I also was channeling too much of my thought to my long buried Libertarian side.  Here I go from philosophy to tribal survival.  Anyway, for what it is worth, let’s discuss the issue once more.

*

FemiNazi’s are of course completely irrational and strung along by their emotions, and wonder why nobody likes them.  Jesus Humping Christ On A Cracker, girls, throw the pro-life fanatics a bone.  Stop insisting on late term abortions.  They aren’t even necessary as a choice ( not including medical issues intruding ) since if the baby is unwanted it doesn’t take eight months to figure that out.  And Religious nut jobs, a blob does not make a human.  Without nerves or a brain, how can you call that a human?  So it has a soul.  So what?  So do all the heathens you call to be massacred since they don’t agree 100% with your faith.  Both sides need to give a little and stop being so dogmatic.  Not that this will ever happen, being the state of our nation nowadays.  Stop being driven by emotion and try to think of practicalities.  We are way overpopulated.  It can’t possibly hurt to acknowledge that if you don’t let fags butt hump each other, nor allow early term abortions, we’ll just get more and more crowded until 99% of us die from famine and the inability to stay warm in winter ( not to mention wars and such ). 

*

The papist insistence that we breed like rabbits until we are squeezed against the pen wire is an anachronism from when the Catholic Church was a colonizing government, and it didn’t hurt anything as we kept dieing of plague and war against the heathens who dared not follow Rome’s rule.  Why do you think Protestants were so hated?  Over a few doctrinal differences?  Hell, no.  It was because they cost the Church money and power.  So they all had to die.   That took a lot of Papist cannon fodder and so replacements were a good idea.  Today?  You think we need MORE Mexicans in this country?  We don’t already have a good ten percent of the population-give or take-as illegals ( using the free medical at ER’s to pop more babies, thanks for ruining that resource for us Gringo’s-but I won’t take on that issue just now )?  We need more of the Super Breeders?  Throw in some Muslim pukes to breed uncontrollably while we are at it?  I had my way, we’d forcibly abort Muslim babies on their way to the first rusty leaking ship leaving the country.  No offense, I just don’t like asswhores trying to blow me up, nor the politicians who let them stay.  Those should be lamp post listed.

*

Birth control should be freely available, and if any religious type doesn’t like it we should just invoke the Constitution.  Separation of church and state, bitches.  Don’t take it if you don’t like it.  All this sounds rather Liberal left leaning, to which I apologize.  But it isn’t about women’s individual choice.  It is about social necessity.  So when overpopulating won wars, gals had no choice but to procreate uncontrollably ( the Church was also adamant about persecuting “witches” who were knowledgeable about birth control/abortion herbs, trying to contain the forbidden knowledge ).  If there are too many people for too few resources, you get China’s One Child Policy, infanticide or in a really pussy move not solving enough of the problem, liberal democracies easy stance on access to birth control or abortion.  It isn’t really up to the gals but society in general which make that decision.  And you could almost say, “well, why not?” since societies prosper or die according to these choices.

*

I hope you all remember that I am an anarchist ( another Sex Pistol favorite, “anarchy in the UK” ) even if a lapsed one ( anarchy and Libertarians can never have the society they want as it contradicts human nature ).  I don’t agree philosophically that women have choice taken away from them.  But anthropologically, that has always been the way it is.  Just as men have little choice whether to fight or not ( the exceptions proved the rule ) in tribal societies, women have had few choices about breeding.  The tribe decides.  She might have a “choice” to starve the newest baby or not, whether by eating less and drying up the milk or simply not feeding it enough, decide whether or not to “accidentally” roll over and smother it one night, but that choice is predicated on denying the other kids the calories they need.  Not much of a “choice” at all.  A Hobson’s Choice isn’t much of one at all.  Or is that Sophie’s Choice?

*

By policy, the US has adopted unrestricted immigration to allow overpopulation while at the same time allowing American women to allow under replacement rate population through abortion and birth control.  We’re just becoming another Third World country of little brown people.  And pardon the crap out of me for sounding racist, but I am NOT a racist but proudly proclaim myself to be a xenophobic.  You may not like the history of American colonialization but Whites took over the place ( and if you bought into the Lincoln Is God teachings, you’ll of course have to acknowledge your deity was all for exporting the Blacks back to Africa.  He was a “separatist” ) and Whites are the race that was living here until the commies screwed with the immigration laws.  And by Blacks own actions, they prefer to be separate themselves.  So how can that make me but not them racist?  I have nothing against Mexicans-I married two of them.  What I have a problem with is making Mexicans into Americans.  They make great neighbors, until they become the majority.  Again, sorry if that makes me sound like a cracker.

*

You can’t be warm and fuzzy when it comes to deciding the survival of your tribes future.  If immigrants are going to breed and take over, well, sorry, no immigrants allowed.  If your religion wants uncontrollable births in a resource contraction, well then, sorry, but screw your religion.  If another race mixing with yours causes friction and civil war, well, sorry I have to act racist.  The Blacks, the worst racists out there, are acting tribal and correctly for their tribes survival.  And if we don’t distance ourselves from them socially then our tribe doesn’t survive ( it doesn’t have to but usually does seem that in the American tribe, we schism along racial lines, or religious now that the Muslims are being bussed in.  If we play nice by the liberals rules and act tolerant, our tribe is dead.  Hump tolerance, hump it very much ).  I don’t wish to be rational here and offend everyone, but if you are White and not living in a White area, you are probably target zero in the coming race and religion wars.

*

A lot of Blacks are Muslim, but that was always a social force linked to survival ( well, most Muslims got that way after their land was invaded and the nice man gave you a choice of assimilating into the Borg or dying, so Blacks adopting the religion for political reasons isn’t very different.  Nor were those Papists very nice giving the pagans the choice of joining in with their loving benevolent God or dying ).  Muslims invading this country ( unlike in Europe, there is still a choice to be made in accepting their seizure of power or not.  A lot of resistance will be from resource fighting with Mexicans and a lot will have to do with a well armed populace showing Muslims the error of their ways as they try to overturn our laws.  Some areas are already lost, but not enough as of now ) might join forces with Blacks as an initial tactic but cultural clashes will most likely prevent a permanent union.  Just expect the initial joint forces to be a problem.  So by living in a Black and/or Muslim area, you are tactically already defeated.  They will defeat you demographically. 

*

Should Whites try to outbreed, the classic strategy historically?  No.  Here is where birth control and abortion work in our favor.  Blacks want more children for welfare benefits and Muslims want to literally outbreed the competition ( many leaders quite openly discussing the war of the womb ).  But both are for more tribal than Whites.  That can also work to our advantage.  Most of the time, tribes are strength.  And you can’t-USUALLY-go wrong betting on that truism.  However, when three mega-trends are against you, it is time to change tactics.  First, every swinging dingus out there is moving to the cities.  Second, Blacks and Muslims have cultural biases for breeding.  Whites do not.  So they have a huge lead and a huge cultural advantage.  Third, Blacks and Muslims are tribal whereas Whites are individualistic.  Instead of fighting against the trends we need to work with them.  Our strengths are that we are rural, lack too many offspring and are scattered and hence independent. 

*

Don’t move to the big city ( you can’t much fight living in a some kind of large town or small city.  Too few can be retreat computer nerds.  The rest need some kind of work.  The trick is to only live in a city so small it lacks a Black ghetto ).  If you are there, you need to move.  The collapse will be for every reason possible EXCEPT racial or religious civil war, but come the collapse those will follow as dawn after dusk.  And since we are already in economic collapse a mini-version of racial war has already started.  MOVE.  Mobility is the whites strength.  Blacks and Muslims congregate, so we must disperse.  To some extent, this has always been so.  Whites founded a city, Blacks took it over demographically and Whites had to move to the suburbs.  But then the Blacks got too close to those, so it is time to move again.  And the reason Whites can move is because we don’t need to be up each others asses all the time.  We can be loners.  We have been for awhile.  By dispersing you avoid being a large target.  In effect, Blacks are mimicking insect colonies, being so numerous you can’t kill them all.  So Whites must NOT be an under populated centralized target.

*

Much was made about the social cohesion of Whites being lost fifty years ago.  Now it can be advantageous.  Disperse and go your own way, moving out of the suburbs into the country ( of course, obviously, beware the oil dependence issue ), away from clusters of those who would do you harm.  And why are we able to move?  Because we don’t have a passel of kids.  We can invest in armories and small businesses and moving vans and switching jobs.  We have the resources to avoid problem areas.  We also have enough of a Old Boys Network-barely, given the FemiNazi’s sell out to our enemies-left that we can work somewhere besides smack dab in the middle of a big city.  It is still something of an advantage to being a White male ( outside of big urban corporate firms ) employment wise.  There are going to be new Black controlled areas soon enough, as well as Muslim and Mormon.  Living there now is living in a soon to be foreign country, with a target on your back.  It is already that way now, ipso facto, but some folks are too ignorant, pig headed and irrational to see this.  I hope you are not one of those people.  If a Black moves away from their area of control, they are surrounded by hostility.  So they usually don’t move.  When you move, you go from occupied territory to a sea of friendly faces.  Why aren’t you moving? 

*

By not playing in the Demographic Game, the Womb War, you are not surrendering to overwhelming forces.  You are gaining  the means to escape them.  Look, I love my kids, and my parents to a smaller degree, but I refused to be tied to them.  Not anymore.  The economic collapse severed those ties ( I was tuned in enough during 2007 to know something was VERY wrong, but had no sense of severity or timing.  I moved out of the urban to a more rural small town just months prior to the final economic collapse in 2008.  I was lucky. You need to be lucky here as well ).  Otherwise I’d still be dependent on a better paying job, paying rent and living amongst hostile forces ( I was going to say “savages” but I think I’ve been non-PC enough already ).  I dodged a bullet and am really trying to advise you to do the same.  Do you think any move to better or protect yourself is going to be without cost?  Prepping isn’t all unicorn glittery farts and tea parties.  It takes real sacrifices.  Buying MRE’s and an AR is relatively painless, allowing you to keep your cubicle warrior job, but it also keeps you in a puddle of gasoline, a very hostile looking minority glaring at you with a matchbook in his hand.  Are you a pyromaniac?  Run the hump away, dumbass!

*

As for after the final waterfall collapse, this strategy of abortion, seclusion and country living ( country living as in small town dwelling, not as in isolated homesteads ) is still not to your determent.  Big groups, today a plus, will quickly turn into a minus as the resources are no longer mined or transported.  Those supposedly insurmountable groups looking so powerful, quickly turn on themselves and wipe themselves out.  Baby factories lose benefits or resources.  Too many kids to feed goes from the States problem to the families death spiral.  Staying secluded, with your own tribe, without as many mouths to feed, but with extra resources, secluded or isolated from the big groups, is a much better survival strategy.  By ignoring the teachings of your religion, by  passively ( who else needs to know you are on the pill, amongst your Jesus Freaks sewing circle? ) ignoring their pleas for unchecked procreation, you end up giving the tribe a better chance of survival.  It isn’t necessarily the moral thing to do, but it is the smart survival way to do it.

END

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. ***You can support me through Patreon ( go to www.patreon.com/bison )***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me a buck and I'll e-mail it to you.  Or, send an extra buck and I'll send you a CD ( the file is in PDF.  I’ll waive this fee if you order three or more books at one time ).  My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184

*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.***   Land In Elko*  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

25 comments:

  1. Blacks are not as racist as Native Americans. At least they don't require PROOF of PURITY to be a member, just looking close enough is ok.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would argue that it isn't racist but economic. Being Indian is automatic welfare bennies, so they need to be assured they aren't sharing the wealth with the undeserving.

      Delete
  2. "anarchy and Libertarians can never have the society they want as it contradicts human nature"
    ============================

    Not at all.

    The root of the problem is laziness and dishonesty, both a product of two of the basest human emotions/motivations: fear and greed.

    To state it another way: humanity involves, most simply, the conscious and principled discipline and control of fear and greed, which one has no choice but to experience as a higher biological organism.

    A good way to think about how the non-human homo sapiens response to fear and greed is that they seek to hoard profits and spread losses.

    The chief motivation is laziness and chief tool to satisfy all is dishonesty.

    The interesting thing about dishonesty -- self, other directed, and institutionalized -- is that the better one is at it (the more dishonest) the less detectable and more powerful it is.

    What's interesting about laziness is how hard people work at not producing tradeable values.

    Consider a bum on the exit ramp day in, day out. I've seen some of them work their asses off at begging in the hot, cold, and rain for years on end. How much easier it would be to work at a job?

    It's the labor theory of value. The lazy look to a world where raw physical activity, disconnected from any other requirements, is of paramount value.

    To look at it in its plainest form, there are those advocating that some fears are just too great not to force others to pay for general anesthesia, and the argument turns on which anesthesia and in what dosage is most "efficient" and "useful."

    Hey, maybe we can "privatize" the production and delivery of it, which still doesn't address the root laziness, dishonesty, individual responsibility or accountability.

    Then there are those, "the nouveaux ancaps," who rightfully understand that you can't hold consistently to individualist principle and advocate any degree of state coercion, but have failed to understand that the state is an effect of a deeper problem.

    They think that you have to win friends and influence people by trying to explain that life would be so much better without the state.

    But you can't truly understand anarchism until you accept that it doesn't matter what society "would be like" without the state.

    It's not the issue.

    The issue is that nobody has any right to chain me to their fears or satisfy their greed at my involuntary expense and anyone who thinks otherwise, even just a little tiny bit can just go fuck right off and there's simply no kind way to put that.

    IOW, it matters not to me what other people think and do, they are free to do as they choose. But under no circumstance are they allowed to include me in any of their falsified charades, ever. I reject all of it outright on it's face.

    I already leave you alone (the figurative you, not you directly) and demand the same in return.

    Yes, the world began the day I was born, and as I get closer to the end of the only life I will ever own this was never more true than today but slightly less true than tomorrow.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I chief issue libertarians have is they look through a prism of economics and philosophy. They should be looking post-surplus, post-nation state, through anthropology prisms.

      Delete
  3. Today's diatribe stinks of racism Jim.
    But, I happen to know what you are actually doing is pointing out the racial identifiers of certain cultural tribes - So this mulatto ass will forgive you.
    But I think you neglect to look at all the tribal markers - Religion and Race are two big ones (a black mormon will have more in common with a white papist, than either will have with a hispanic muslim.) But you can see the tribes most clearly in the criminal underbelly of our society. Crips V Bloods V Los Zetas V Danites V Juggalos V the Muslim Mafia, etc, etc. Clearly the race and even religions are not more than at best a single aspect of tribal identity. Most tribal identity is expressed through association and behavior (like choices in jewelry, clothing, verbiage, etc.) There are always racial, and even religious exceptions to tribal identity. But in those cases the other identifiers need to be stronger for the individuals who stand out.
    How one dresses, speaks and behaves indicate your tribe to those who know the tribe.
    I dont care how 'white' or 'brown' or 'black' the skin of someone looks - if they carry the cultural identifiers of another tribe or culture I will assume that they are of that tribe or culture and thus enemy. If they carry markers for my culture, I will give them some small opportunity (depending on circumstances) to prove themselves members of our shared culture and possibly of my tribe or at least an associated one, before I assume they are absolutely my enemy. *note I didn't say I would TRUST them - just give them a small opportunity to show if they could be trustworthy- preferably in a way that would be something I could afford to lose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Other tribal markers are not nearly as important in the great scheme of things right now. You are of course correct on an individual level but I'm speaking in macro terms. The Mormons are a threat to me AFTER the collapse, Blacks are a danger currently. In general. This is one of those posts I never would have written before, as few besides yourself know the difference, or care, between xenophobia and racism. Now, as the waterfall is so near, I feel it is my duty to discuss it as lives are more important than feelings. Plus, to be honest, I'm not is fear of angry minority leaders reading this.

      Delete
    2. Glad to see you not take it personal, JJ Grey.

      I'm a female Mormon and I also understand where Jim is coming from. Again, it's not racism as much as identifying tribes that "YOU" don't belong to. It's reality and instead of folks getting upset, they should look at the lesson being taught.

      For example, I live in North Idaho -- a place where Mormons are a small minority. In fact, there is open hostility towards Mormons up here by the Evangelical Christians.

      This is something I keep in mind for post collapse. I have done what I can to mitigate the negatives. If I was smart, I would join the local judgemental jerks at the _____ Church but I hate their sanctimonious holier than thou attitude.

      There are pros and cons that at the moment seem to cancel each other out. Ultimately, it will depend on what type of collapse we see happen.

      Idaho Homesteader

      Delete
    3. Systematic collapse. It can't be any other way. Of course, it is also about timing so you might die when it is still a economic collapse. I do tend to stress time forward too much.

      Delete
  4. You started out OK, then you started fragmenting and mixing up the points you were trying to make.

    Finally you just went all to pieces and I could not wait for you to end it.

    Long doe not make it good.

    Trying to make too many points is not good. Mentioning all your miscellaneous side points is bad.

    Do you read your completed post and then try to clarify and condense anything?

    YKW
    MM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Condensed and clarified is how all the other jagoffs do it. No thanks. My way is more difficult to follow but the added detail is what you don't get elsewhere. Detail clarifies my point. Lack thereof isn't clarification so much as unbacked simplistic statements. Perhaps you should think of it as a booklet form rather than a newspaper form.

      Delete
  5. I understand your point about over-population and I agree that birth control (at least in some form) is smart but, I can't go along with abortion. Once the decision has been made to make a baby, that is where choice ends. Calling the baby a "blob" or a "clump of cells" may help in dehumanizing it before one destroys it but the fact is that upon conception the baby has a unique DNA. It is separate from the mother or the father. Killing the baby should be looked at no differently than offing old people who "no longer contribute" to society. It should be unthinkable.

    Of course I also prefer to think of our problem as resource availability as opposed to over-population. In a purely mathematical sense they are one in the same (1 meal = 1 person) but, as soon as I label it "over-population" the solution becomes eliminating people. If I call it a resource deficiency then the solutions tend to be based on finding or exploiting more resources (yes, I know they are finite but, they could still be better managed and utilized).

    As a man of faith I still believe God's promises in the bible:
    Matt 6
    28 And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin:
    29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
    30 Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?
    31 Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed?
    32 (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things.
    33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
    34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

    -Novice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soldiers dehumanize the enemy, pro-abortion folks dehumanize the fetus. You don't have to agree with it but that is the way of the world. I'll bet you a jelly donut that your fellow religious folks would dehumanize abortionists to kill them if they were allowed to.

      Delete
    2. I completely agree that dehumanization is taking place (it has to in order to forestall the guilt of taking a life). However, justification of wrong doing doesn't make it righteous whether you're talking about killing babies or killing abortionists or even killing terrorists. Murder is murder. That's why it's such a moral issue. You are right that we have a resource contraction issue (notice I didn't call it overpopulation). Unfortunately you are also right that many will use that as justification for killing the other side. Does that worry me? Of course (more than it should for someone who claims to live by faith). I don't have the answers, I'm just the fly in the ointment pointing out the moral issue of just killing off the other tribe so mine can survive.

      -Novice

      Delete
    3. But you miss the point that morality doesn't apply BETWEEN tribes, only AMONG tribal members. Remember, killing isn't murder, in war. And tribal war is irregular, not conventional.

      Delete
    4. Just remember everyone belongs to more than one tribe- And everyone belongs to the tribe of man (unless you are a non-human either alien or AI). Which tribe we give preference/greatest loyalty to is the real question.
      The tribe of man is currently too huge to get more than a fraction of a fraction of our loyalty.

      Delete
    5. We have the luxury of picking tribes NOW, but that won't last. Those forming true tribes now will gain the edge.

      Delete
  6. The self confessed staunch anti-racist professor at Evergreen college discovered that at the end of the day it didn't really matter what he did or think. People have labelled him as a racist and he is marked for violent retribution.

    Skin colour is just one way (and perhaps the most base / convenient way) of knowing who is on your side and who is not. Nobody gets to pick which side they are on. I guess that makes sense as whenever I'm on a team there are always people on there that I don't like

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Blacks hate on the White professor, it's okay. We hate on the Blacks for doing so and we are racist. We are idiots.

      Delete
  7. Good article. It takes balls to touch on such topics in today’s world, so you’re to be commended. I’m not a hater by any means, but minority Americans do not see themselves in the same way as white Americans.

    As an example, our neighbor is a rich Mexican that can barely speak English (It’s as much of a mystery to me as it is to anyone else in the neighborhood). Regardless of his status, guess which side of the political spectrum he supports each election? Yeah. And that’s the difference. Outside tribe’s will always do what’s right by their own. Whites are the only group that will throw their own under the bus for all others. I suppose that one could chalk this up to a series of successful “white guilt” campaigns over the years.

    Therefore it is the height of folly for white leftists to be staging violent protests as a form of backlash to common sense immigration measures, or by supporting sanctuary cities. They obviously can’t see the long term implications of such actions, which are:

    “Pedro” and “Javier” enter the country illegally.

    There are far too many people, and far too few jobs to go around. But, as they say, “Pedro and Javier are doing jobs that no American wants to do.” (That may be true for the time being, but as the economy sinks further into the abyss, it won’t be for much longer).

    The wives of both of these fine gentlemen will have multiple children each, which are now legal citizens.

    Pedro and Javier’s children will grow up, but they will not be content being farm hands as were their fathers. They will follow the “American dream” and go to college, either tuition free, or mostly free, since they will qualify for grants and scholarships, paid for by a shrinking pool of middle class tax dollars, since Pedro and Javier’s $8 an hour gardening jobs certainly aren’t going to cut it.

    But it gets much better. Pedro and Javier’s children are hired through affirmative action over the future children of the same white liberal protesters. All of this in a declining job market, in which automation will take away an even far greater numbers of jobs in the upcoming decade. And that my friends is the genius of the left.

    Then again, it’s not like anyone has ever accused leftists of having an overabundance of common sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Commies can't have common sense as that would make their utopias unplanable. Which is why I think most Yuppie Scum lean that way politically. Real world, they wouldn't have their positions and wealth-only in fantasy Oil Age times. Lefties are the same surplus wealth created jobs we could barely afford forty years ago. Don't get me started again!

      Delete
    2. Good post, Anonymous.

      Idaho Homesteader

      Delete
    3. The "Will do jobs the locals won't do" tripe is used in Australia to justify the huge numbers of immigrants as well. However their justification is an incomplete sentence. It should read "Will to the jobs locals won't FOR THE PAY BEING OFFERED". Pay a vegetable picker 6 figures and all of a sudden you'll have college age applicants telling HR about their "dreams of becoming a vegetable picker when they were young"

      Delete
    4. To save enough for another BMW with mistress, the elites have doomed us. Bastards. And it is a shame we'll be fighting each the ( the poor ) rather than the elites.

      Delete
  8. https://www.wsj.com/articles/venezuelas-shortages-spur-perilous-sea-journeys-1498172121

    Interesting is the photo's of what these poor sods are paying for black market basic goods (toilet paper etc).

    The other day I got a gentle ribbing from the OL about buying deoderant *again*. I have a years supply now. I hammered a 1/2 price sale. I said I will never have to pay full price again because I'll restock at the next sale. Heck, one time I got cranky because I couldn't find my deoderant anywhere. I contacted the manufacturer saying WTF? where can I buy it. They replied they stopped making it 18 months prior. LOL (not LOL is the time & money spent trying to find a new one that worked for me. Smelly times my friends)

    Not so funny is a non prescription pharmacy product I used. It's no longer made and I have tried EVERY fricken substituted and they don't work. The only stuff that comes close is 10 x the price as only one pharmacy in Australia makes it and only as a favour to a nursing home. GRRRR The funny bit is the same story as my deoderant only with a different product. Sigh

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For deodorant, just get a mens cologne and use a spritz or two under each pit. That worked for me in tropical Florida. It doesn't store as well, seeming to lose its strength in about a year, but it still works to mask pit nasty.

      Delete

I must moderate-trust me. You don't want to see what happens otherwise. Sometimes it takes awhile to respond as I only check two or three times a day. No N-Bombs, nothing to get me libeled. Otherwise, have at it. If you criticize me, make sure to praise my hair first.