A FOUR LETTER WORD
*note: this is interesting although I've only seen it from one source and that is the "Economist" which is such a Bankers/Elite cheerleader rag it is pathetic, so take it with a grain of salt. The global winds are driven by the temperature difference between the poles and tropics. So if the Artic is warming the winds slow down. Which screws up the northern jet stream ( the ocean currents seem to effected by the sea temperatures ) which might explain the very odd weather at times. I disbelieve Gore Warming the most when the elite approve of it for their own reasons, so this is just a "interesting if true" tidbit.
*
“Free” seems to be a four
letter word. Not just recently but
pretty much throughout our history. So
when you see these semi simians getting all agitated over their God Given
rights, when TrumpTards get all heated up over liberals trying to pack more
towel heads on top of extra Latino’s, because evidently having so many idiots
jammed into a country like India where people get to starve as a bonus of
citizenship is a great idea to emulate,
you know that to join them is to invite trouble. The population at large never cared about
true freedom and it never will. We
already talked about how the only freedom you’ll ever be granted is via force,
and today I’ll talk about how the history of this country guarantees that you
will never receive support for freedom from the population. Forget rebelling. It is a suckers game. The Hippies thought they had a shot at it, or
at least the more radical elements such as the Black Panthers and Weathermen,
but they were deluded.
*
Don’t be deluded. You are already optimistically deluded about
the collapse being softly manageable, don’t compound that by believing the
people want freedom and will join you in quests of liberation. They could give two craps about freedom as a
concept by itself. Economic freedom,
that is a different story. As long as
people are free to try to screw over others for profit, that is all they give
two craps about. Immigrants don’t come
over here to be free. No rational person
( which excludes most native born idiots who believe the hogwash force fed
them-no one sees the irony in being forced to go to school where they teach you
that you are free ) looks at our police state and thinks, hey, I’ll be free if
I go over there. You still must pay
bribes here, they are just institutionalized, and you can still be jailed by
crooked cops. If you don’t believe me
travel with five grand in cash and then when they pull you over, get really
lippy with them. Talk about your
rights. I’ll wager you a jelly filled
donut you’ll get some planted drugs placed in your trunk and be charged as a
dealer. I double dog dare you, you think
we are free.
*
Nor do immigrants come
here because they believe some BS about working hard and moving up. They know they can move up, marginally. To management from grunt work. If they are bilingual and drink the company
Kool Aid they can earn almost twice the minimum wage! Immigrants come here, despite the high price,
because there is money here whereas there is none at home. They don’t care if it is dangerous work, low
paying work, drug dealing or welfare fraud.
At least there is something. The
alternative is living in a urban craphole and starving ( in American craphole
cities, you don’t starve. You might die
from Black gangs, but you won’t starve.
For this, apparently, we are #1
). Back in the day, immigrants
were willing to enter indentured servitude, up to seven years, and often
working at Black Slave levels of danger, to come to this country ( now, you
just worry about becoming a sex slave rather than working in a swamp chopping
trees ). Did they do it because they
would be free? Hardly. The official regional churches had no problem
micromanaging your life. The immigrants
came here to avoid starving.
*
Does the Potato Famine
ring a bell? How about the French
Revolution ( part of the whole time of peasant starvation thing Europe had
going on over there. Also remember that
America was hoped to be a prison colony like Oz became. Do you think Les Miserables [ pardon my
crappy French spelling ] was about some dude escaping unjust imprisonment? Sure, perhaps. It was also about peasants starving and the
partial answer to overpopulation by the authorities ). You immigrated, took a chance on dying on the
trip, took a chance on dying during indenture, then took a chance on dying
battling Indians so as to get your own plot of land. Land wasn’t about partial freedom like it is
now, it was about farming to feed yourself so you didn’t die in the city from
lack of jobs and skyrocketing grain prices.
Get your head out of your well fed Oil Age ass and realize food
surpluses started around 1850’s or so as we began mechanizing. Before that, food security was everything,
not some vague highfalutin notion of personal liberty.
*
Now, at one time, say
during Stalin’s purges or Hitler’s pogroms, freedom from oppression might have
been a selling point. Immigrants gladly
accepted becoming slave soldiers because they were trading assassination for
fighting. But that was just being less
enslaved, less harassed. Not really
free. Pre-Revolutionary War, citizens
were not free. Our churches were as
unforgiving of personal choice as their churches. And the States were theocracies. After the Constitution replaces the articles
of confederation, perhaps you were free from religious control, but the federal
government still dictated your conduct.
You were a little less oppressed.
You went from local theocracy to state government. God was replaced by government. That isn’t freedom per se, but only by degree
of rule. Lincoln did away with any state
sovereignty ( the fight being over economics, not freedom ), further enslaving
Northerners as well as Southerners ( the South just had to live dirt poor as a
colony for many generations. They were
less free than northerners, but Yankees still lost something in the process ).
*
Wilson further enslaved us
to a central bank. Prohibition, alcohol
edition, began the war on guns.
Actually, New York led that fight, as always a bellwether for tyranny,
but nationally it took another twenty years.
FDR took away the freedom to own
real money, only re-gifted to us after the next depression kept most citizens
from being able to afford it ( not to mention the real estate bubble being soft
sold as a better strategy against inflation ).
Now, obviously throughout all this, there was some agitation to stop
changing events. The Tories preferred British
rule to local rule. The main bone of
contention seemingly over whether western expansion was advisable or not, with
the new local winning elite ending up profiting from said expansion ( just
another genocide for profit scheme, but with White Serf’s added to the death
toll ). The Civil War could have been a
major blow to centralized government.
But because of wartime “emergency” rule, neither side would have emerged
as free as they had started-as relative as that had been. The point being, while history written by the
winners portrayed all as accepting the new régime rule, there was never
unanimous acceptance. But there was
enough to win the day, and so with some certainty I’ll state that by and large,
lack of personal freedom was accepted in return for treasure. And if not for treasure across all classes,
then for the freedom from starvation.
*
Not always of course. The Great Depression saw dangerous
undercurrents emerge as famine in the form of severe malnutrition was unleashed
by a swell Democrat that loved the Little People SOOOOOO much. Ask anybody and they’ll tell you. One of the elite ( Trump, anyone? ) who
pretended to care so much he stole all the gold and gave it to the bankers and
starved everyone, Stalin Style. Just as
Stalin starved the Ukrainians ( who want the Russians back in charge in
exchange for-you guessed it-the freedom from freezing to death in the winter,
because freedom doesn’t mean jack when you’re dying ), FDR starved the
independent farmers out ( the smart ones returned the farm to the bank before
their kids died from lack of money for the doctor ) through debt. I guess if you are buying into the whole “FDR
was a super stud” lie than that means you can never be starved out of your bank
owned Homestead currently. Oh, wait,
what about that high property tax and unaffordable medical? But the Depression starvation period was an
aberration. An ebb and flow throughout
history. Usually, in exchange for
freedom from starvation, Americans have been nothing short of ecstatic to trade
in any and all personal freedoms. You’ll
note that after the Great Depression, as we became fatter and fatter we have
less and less freedoms.
*
All these “patriots” falling all over
themselves to blindly support any foreign military adventure ( ‘Murica, love it
or leave it, you non-jackbooted thug worshiper! ), bleating unthinkingly the
public school propaganda about how free we are and about how we die for other
peoples freedom, are the last thing from freedom supporters. They are the shock troops of the Propaganda
Corps, gladly supporting our suppression.
With friends like those, who needs enemies?
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. ***You can support me through Patreon ( go to www.patreon.com/bison )***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me a buck and I'll e-mail it to you. Or, send an extra buck and I'll send you a CD ( the file is in PDF. I’ll waive this fee if you order three or more books at one time ). My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184
*** Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there