Saturday, September 14, 2019

ohtay fascism 2-article 2 of 2 today


OHTAY FASCISM 2 ( second of two articles today )
Yesterday I pointed out that capitalism is how you manage excess resource wealth, and when you didn't have colonial treasure, you had to revert to either socialism or fascism to cope with social unrest in a declining resource environment. People get so hung up on viewing government as a religion, an ideology they must preach and protect at all costs, they ignore reality. The Chinese went from ideology which starved millions to a reality based system ( quasi-free market under totalitarian rule-or, as I recently read elsewhere, Stalinist 2.0 ) which propelled their economy past that of the US, based on a cost of living adjusted math.
*
In their quest to prove to themselves that only capitalism is good and just and works perfectly, most folks gladly surrendered to the globalists ( not as in, “One World Government”, but as in “we export your job to another Rothschild's Colony” ). How has that worked out for us? Yes, Orange Man finally got around to seriously building the wall. His hotels are now staffed by LEGAL immigrants, as Google and Facebook employ half as expensive ( dot not feather ) Indians to program its censorship software.
*
We were better when NOT under globalism disguised as capitalism. We were better off when the government had more say in our private lives ( this is a minefield of a statement-but, in short, I mean it regulated and enforced what was culturally acceptable to everyone but progressives ). We saw a steady vig payment to the bankers, but it wasn't crippling like it is now. And Big Business was forced, by government, to share in profits. It was called Unionism and technically it is communism, but you see what happens without it.
*
It was more Populism than Robber Baronism or Capitalism. And with its strong military flavor colonizing the globe, it really was pretty close ( except the central bank OUT of the government control ) to fascism. Which, again, let me remind you, is JUST private business having a social responsibility to national strategy, enforced by the government ( why do you think there is so much push back on “nationalism” right now? It is because the globalists fear losing control back to national governments ). We had the excess wealth PRIOR to colonizing that it wasn't the hard slog other countries had establishing their empires. We had resources to waste.
*
Note I'm not claiming that our form of government was necessarily that which the elite wished for. For Unions to take hold ( and even for socialist type safety nets to be established-and no, I give ZERO credit to FDR for that since he FIRST stole all the gold and devalued its replacement 40%, waiting around for folks to starve in poverty, THEN decided to throw a bone to the masses ) there had be be plenty of social unrest ( back when military arms owners weren't scared to shoot at government agents ).
*
The folks on the Right claim that FDR was a coup by communists, and point out how enamored the elite were by Uncle Joe's success during the Depression. I contend that FDR was a puppet to the bankers, as demonstrated by his gold confiscation DAYS after being sworn in to defend the Constitution, and bankers only want communism in other countries, by their puppets. The Great Depression was engineered. It wasn't an accident a commie needed to save us from. And bankers prefer fascism, as it not only keeps them in power, it channels military money their way. In our case, having the central bank, it was a way to hugely bloat the national debt, going quasi-military dictatorship fascist.
*
Culture must be conducive to its form of government. Communists easy won over peasants just off the yoke of serfdom in Russia ( and still starving as peasants in China ), because it WAS an actual improvement. Russia didn't have the culture for city living and an agrarian merchant based economy ( although China did ), and strong government control was viewed in a positive light ( that is what freed them them the Asian horseman hordes ).
*
Americans are, really, if you rub away the patriotic coverings a bit, selfish and individualistic. We are used to rolling about in filthy excess ( which was both a result of stealing whatever they wanted [ didn't we take by force private charters granted by the Crown? ] and the multitudes adjusting to life after grinding poverty as indentured servants or slaves ) and we don't like sharing that with Johnny Come Lately's. Don't forget, the backlash against pasty white folks ( Germans, Irish, even the French already here ) was just as fierce as that against Mostly White folks ( Jews, Slavs, Italians ) and currently against Barely White folks ( Latinos ).
*
We aren't racist as much as we are just selfish pricks who had a nice tribe with a nice treasure and we didn't want to share. It was mostly economic. Our turning towards fascism had elements of racism, to be sure. Hitler learned from us. We were sterilizing undesirables long before he came to power. Immigration pretty much ceased with the founding of the Federal Reserve bank. One wonders if this was put into effect to appease the citizens already here ( instead of Extra going to fuzzy foreigners brought in to suppress wages, Less Extra went to the bankers. A win for both parties ).
*
Don't imagine for a moment that Money hasn't been the main battle for a very long time in this country. Since way before our official founding. As discussed previously about our greed to stockpile resources before their declining to emergency levels, Americans have just followed human nature fighting over wealth, no matter how much or how little was there. The Germans, surrounded by enemies, just wanted more land. Americans, with so much land it cost us to keep it, we focused on the more intangible luxury and money. Both cultures were identical in following our programming, however.
*
Why were Germans and Americans comfortable with fascism rather than socialism ( such as the French or Chinese embraced )? Culture, as well as the economic factors. We weren't ruined by civilization, and we were more tribal and militaristic. I think socialism is more to the liking of those less individualistic, more comfortable with lacking the responsibility of the individual. More Of The Herd, as it were. Both systems feature Big Government. Fascism is more egalitarian in the tribal sense, in that every warrior is roughly equal.
*
The socialists have mass conscripted armies, also, but they are NOT warrior-like in culture. Their armies are mere cannon fodder, by temperament ( this applies to the Soviets, in general. The American leaders tried to fight in this manner, and did for a century, but the soldiers were more individualist and martial. Only after the military leadership started supporting the death of the old fascist system did the troops rebel against the practice of being cannon fodder ).
*
Why were we even Fascist if that system is utilized by already poor countries? I think that WAS the bankers ploy to forestall social unrest as they subverted and took over the system. It turned us into a coherent tribe and turned up the flame under colonialism and militarism, distracting us from the process.
Tomorrow, the war between the socialists and fascists in this country coming soon.
( .Y. )
( today's related Amazon link click HERE )
*
note: PB, your PayPal donation is very welcome and appreciated.  Many thanks.
*
note: Damn!  It rains after a slight drought.  HT, we thank you for your PayPal donation.
*
note: great article on our one party system, HERE 
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).
*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.
*** Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there



6 comments:

  1. I simplify.
    Two kinds of Indins:

    *** Curry Indins, aka 'Asians'.
    Oddly, although curry Indins come from far far away, they speak pretty good American, the language of my people and Caucasian Nationalists in general.

    *** Casino Indins, aka 'Native Americans' and 'First Peoples' and 'Turtle Island people'.
    Among the myths surrounding these magnificents and nobles, they received diseased blankets from evil Caucasian folk then died a horridly-awful death... but the gifters had 'native' immunity so we avoided a similar fate.

    Oh, and Cristofer Columbus liked nine-year old casino Indin girls... a fine example of inherited guilt-by-association.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder if AmerIndians are pissed that the PC folks hijacked their real grievances with the new fake ones?

      Delete
    2. I don’t know, but one imagines that african americans are pissed upon finding out about this one :D

      https://duckduckgo.com/?q=anthony+johnson+slave+owner&t=lm&atb=v1-1&ia=web

      Nah, probably not. As usual, revisionist history class always leaves this part of history out, so they're probably not even aware of it.

      Delete
    3. I noticed Google is looking more like YouTube. Ignoring your search results as if the subject doesn't exist. Thank you, DuckDuckGo!

      Delete
    4. Funny you should mention that, because I too was going to make a note about that. My brother searched for this dude (Anthony Johnson) the other day, and the results were more or less hidden, unless you put his name, followed by the words “slave holder”. Now I tried it, and to be fair, he came right up. But I don’t have any doubt that google’s many bots don’t keep tabs on this sort of thing, and then uncensor them when called out on it:

      “Hey Frank, We’ve got some deplorable complaining that when you type in the the first black dude, that held legally, court sanctioned slaves, and paved the way for slavery in America, no results come up. Better change that algorithm, before anyone else catches on” :D

      Delete
    5. If it wasn't for those bastard Deplorables, our jobs would be so much easier! Two hours a day, which include bathroom and lunch breaks, just adding in new Trigger Words. But now...

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED