daily ad

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

call it retirement 1 of 2


CALL IT RETIREMENT

Over the years-or at least the last twenty or twenty five

years or so, after guys got all pussy whipped and worthless- the subject of talking your spouse into allowing room in the budget for prepping has been a hot topic.  I wrote a book on it, Survival Divorce, where after embarrassing personal experience I can attest to the effectiveness of combining frugal preparations with leaving stupid dumb bitches who would rather have you and the children die rather than reduce her living standard now ( if she still had her looks she could always pimp herself out to the new warlord on the block-an ancient female survival mechanism.  Hey, don’t take it personally.  You were, maybe, only her baby daddy.  Not her red hot lover.  Maybe, because something like up to a quarter of offspring are the product of cuckolding ).  And no, it wasn’t like I was the smart and strong one who left her.  She took the kids and left.  But it was a very expensive lesson I did learn well. 

*

Alas, I understand not all of you can leave the testicle wearing wife ( you think you have it bad, after the wife castrated you and pickled your balls and put them on the mantelpiece for you to gaze forlornly upon?  Put yourself in Barry The Kenyan Golfers shoes.  Think about having to service that transvestite fugly bastard.  Even if you float that way.  You know she definitely wears the pants in that family ).  Until the kids are old enough, your punk ass bitch life is owned.  I say, leave the bitch anyway and suffer the pay cut.  As if it was a paycut.  You went from earning $25 k a year and seeing nothing but room and board to seeing 55% going to the ex.  Subtract taxes to get whatever is left over.  Usually not enough for even a loft apartment and Top Ramen for dinner every night.  If you figure out how to get your rent down, perhaps living in your car and showering at the gym, you have actual prep money left over.  I get it, $400 a month gross budget might not seem to be worth leaving the wife.  Ah, newsflash dude, a wife like that?  Worth giving up 80% of your pay anyway, no matter what the motivation.  The kids will eventually get old enough to free you from the Ex Wife Tax.  The alternative is wasting your life supporting a user and a hater. 

*

But what if you don’t want to leave?  Like, she is okay in all aspects except she refuses to see that all empires implode and we are, with hundreds of military bases around the world and free oil for Treasury Bonds, obviously an empire.  She thinks ethanol is a beneficial additive to gasoline rather than a desperate attempt at stretching out our dwindling oil supply by starving the middle east peasants of corn.  She has a nice rack and is a pleasant conversationalist.  Whatever.  I won’t judge, not after four wives under my belt ( of course, I learned after wife #2 that all new Old Ladies could accept my prepping or piss off, no discussion.  I have never again lived in abject fear of being nuked [ as the collapse of the Soviet Union unfolded, there were some concerns that a nuclear exchange could have been initiated by the Politburo as a desperate Hail Mary ] without at least some hope of supplies being of some use.  Not that I used that scare wisely.  I have no dosimeter or similar equipment.  The point is, if I take THAT scare seriously again, I’ll have the option of responding because I no longer picked the wrong domestic partner ).

*

The point here is that whatever you are doing, leaving the old spouse and planning your sales pitch for the new one, or first starting out on selling the prepping idea to the spouse, or possibly but I’m unsure how well a change in arguments will work, switching from doom and gloom to another plea to persuade your wife that preps are a good idea, you might want to think about forgetting the Civilization Collapse Scenario and switch over to the Stockpiling For A Diminished Financial Capacity During Retirement Scenario ( heretofore henceforth referred to as just “retirement” ).  No wife wants to hear about civilization collapse.  She worked hard at getting this perfect house, and there is no way she wants to believe that millions of restless urban ghetto dwellers shall overrun it in search of another SNAP card that actually works after the lights go out.  Look at it from a females point of view.  These are the bitches that literally starve themselves to achieve the perceived perfect weight and body shape.  They smoke to suppress their appetite.  They stay in perpetual debt to have nice clothes and a nice car and a nice house in a nice location with nice looking children.  To her, it is all about hen pecking order placement, or even just belonging to a pack of hens.  It is all about appearances.  This is hardwired, not optional.

*

Guys will also seek to belong.  We pick a perceived leader and as long as he is worthy, will follow his leadership.  He just needs to prove himself.  And there is your difference.  Guys are performance orientated, girls are societal orientated.  A guy at work will bust his ass, and if he has a girl boss he is not perceived as an adequate worker.  He has no time to ingrain himself in with the group as he is too busy actually doing something.  Bitches perform a needed and important role in groups, they just don’t belong in the workplace where relationships are less important than task completion.  But, to end that digression, the point is that gals don’t think in terms of planning for the future as well as guys ( and to my female minions, who you know I love more than the rest because you have the courage to go against the norm, you do understand I’m speaking in generalities here-there are always exceptions to prove the rule ). 

*

Well, I should say they don’t plan for non-group approved futures.  College is okay.  You must be perceived a better mother who wants the best for her spawn, so college planning by kindergarten is acceptable.  You wonder why all those soccer moms running around as a taxi service do it?  Is it love?  Or is it her gaining group bonus points?  Anyway, planning for the apocalypse, outside of Mormons who are given the dictate by the church to procreate wildly, earn more money so their tithe is increased ( and so they can earn even more money for more kids so more future LDS dues payers are ready and waiting to fill their roles-and, no, Virginia, I’m not hating on the Mormons who just took a page out of the Papists rulebook ) and more importantly for our discussion here, prep for the apocalypse, no other female is likely to have prepping on the approved plan list by her hen flock.  More tomorrow.

END

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page.  IF YOU DON’T SEE THE AD, DISABLE AD BLOCK ( go to the Ad Blocker while on my page and scroll down the menu to “disable this site” ). You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase.  For those that can’t get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.  Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for mere Book Money, so do your part.*** 
*Contact Information*  Links To Other Blogs *  Land In Elko*  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com           *wal-mart wheat
*Link To All My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

27 comments:

  1. "...talking your spouse into allowing room in the budget..."
    =============================

    Right there is where it goes wrong.
    If you have to talk somebody into something the premise is flawed.

    About 10 years into it I got fed up with the whole *budget* thing because each of us had our own ideas on how a budget was supposed to work.
    So I set out to find a better way because the way my mom and dad did it no longer worked, for obvious reasons.

    I took all of the unmanipulateble expenses and put them in a *box* (house payment, utilities, insurance) and then cut that box in half. I created a joint checking account for this box and she and I pay half of that amount each, each month, without fail. Ex., if the total amount for the house and utilities and insurance is $1000 per month then she pays $500 and I pay $500. Simple.

    After that, we each pay our own bills.
    We each have our own vehicle and we pay for it.
    I can't expect her to pay for a vehicle I want.
    Because the way the system is set up we pay jointly for the insurance, mentioned above.

    We both go to the grocery store at the same time and we split the bill 50/50 as soon as we get home.
    We don't snivel about minor costs for stuff like bread and milk purchased at a local store.
    We are both adult in that regard.

    If she wants a new shirt she buys it and pays for it.
    Same for me.
    That stuff is not in the *box* nor should it.

    If I take my dog to the groomer I pay for it.
    If her cat gets sick she takes it to the vet and pays for it.
    We have both learned that multiple pets are expensive as we each have to pay for the choices we make and we adjust our behavior accordingly.

    In the past 23 years approx since this system was implemented we argue very little and NEVER about money.

    The old skool budget process obscures how money is spent and thus budgeting that way is no budget at all.
    It builds spite and underlying anger and all kinds of additional problems start to develope.

    There's an old saying, "The argument is never about what the argument is about.", and that is true.
    The argument is usually the pop-off valve being overloaded by nonsense that causes all the subsurface stuff to float to the top and disaster can easily occur.

    The above has no bearing on people that have simply not taken the time forehand to analyze their perspective mate properly.
    If you just jump right into a relationship without properly vetting the subject matter then I guess you deserve what you get.
    There is no free lunch.
    You either pay up front or you pay even more in the rear but you will pay.

    Paying attention to parents over an 18 to say 25 year period is very helpful in this regard, and a working brain, of course.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great reply. Give the minions an alternate means of achieving financial bliss. Of course there are problems with any system, but minimizing them is the thing.

      Delete
    2. Ghostsniper is dead on with that split budget. Me and the first wife did it the OLD Way hence the divorce . Me and the Present wife split the set bills like he said . Present wife contributes to prepping as CAMPING SUPPLY'S I cover the food and ammo.

      Delete
    3. Me and the baby momma did it the old fashion way-she got all my paycheck and she did the budget.

      Delete
  2. On the election...nothing will of course change. But things won't get far worse far quicker as they would have with Hilary. Let's hope that Alzheimer's Annie doesn't try again in four years, as this race was exhausting. Bonus, the House Negro will finally get out of our hair.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown!

    -eviltwin

    ReplyDelete
  4. So,
    The Pumpkin king now gets to grab the reigns of an Wholly-Owned FBI, and a Weaponized IRS.


    -eviltwin

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The better to increase the riches of the 1% with!

      Delete
    2. Look at it this way, 1/2 the people are already pissed off at him. If he soils on the other 1/2 he'll be in a place that's not very comfortable. The magic negro had it made, he could do no wrong to the 1/2 that chose him and the 1/2 that didn't choose him could never get a majority. I hate this political system and try to not to get involved.

      Delete
    3. The system does indeed suck and was designed that way so your greedy ass wouldn't try to take away the resources of your superiors.

      Delete
    4. I look at it this way James. While I generally don't put much faith into the elections, and our elected leaders, I truly believe that a Hitlery election would have finished the country off rather quickly. Hate speech legislation, draconian gun legislation on the federal level, and I'd imagine a whole slew of new anti-male feminist laws. Just look at her exit speech. She was more disappointed than anything that she couldn't further the feminist agenda to even more draconian levels than it already is.

      I do believe that Trump, as flawed as he may be, has bought us a little more time. Get those firearms and ammo with relative ease now. Get all of your preps in place now. We've been given the gift of a little extra time, don't waste it. For as with mice and roaches, the left will be back to haunt us again someday, and when they arrive, they will with a vengeance. And once there's nothing to stop them, look out. When that time comes be ready.

      Delete
    5. Couldn't agree more. Trump was a one off time gift. Piss on it and be sorry.

      Delete
  5. A question Mr Dakin for you and the gental reader to ponder on. Why are women not as strong as men? No need to go into the whole testosterone thing. On the surface surely in would be a advantage, re natural selection, to be a strong female rather than a less strong one. There has got to be a biological reason. In some other species, some female are the equal or even the stronger of the sexs. Just maybe rape was a major part of how we bred in the past.
    Aussie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, we have absolutely no natural defenses like other animals ( sweating/running being more of an offense ), so you can't really say "other animals have...X". We are rather brain centered. That said, I'd guess that not rape, but raiding/bride capture was the predominate "reason" for the trait ( if it isn't as simple as females needed extra fat rather than muscle for the long incubation followed by lactation required to nourish the developing brain-which would be my first guess ).

      Delete
    2. Simple, their bodies are designed for childbearing,(hence superior thigh strength), not fighting,(hence superior upper body strength).

      Delete
    3. women are STRONGER then men in some respects (you try pooping out turd the size of a watermelon - and then showering it with love and affection) Hips, to some extent legs and some forms of endurance women beat men. Pain tolerance as well for several forms of pain. I've known several women to just go about their day in pain that would put a man in bed for a week.
      But expending their resources on having strong arms to express aggression just isn't in the evolutionary cards for women, it would take resources away from their other advantages that help them breed and raise the young - if they need strong arms they just manipulate a man into being those arms that they need.

      Delete
    4. I think nicking brides from the tribe in the next valley is pretty dammed close to rape. I don't think if you went to the trouble of running of with a brand new gal, dragging her home by the hair you would then try and woo her by wineing and dinneing her and bringing her flowers. It would be more about wham bam thanks bitch now go out and dig some yams and get to cookin me up my mammoth steak.
      Aussie

      Delete
    5. Just a guess mind you, but because women have the unique ability to produce entire people at will, men have to have something to balance it out, and that something is strength and testosterone.

      If women had men's strength as well as the ability to reproduce they would be a formidable species most definitely - and they'd be ass-rapin' their male concubine every dam day to keep them inline.

      Delete
    6. JJ-spot on: manipulate a strong pair of arms. Much lower energy requirement.
      Aussie-women throughout history have faced forced relocation and slavery. What you are forgetting is that from their viewpoint, the alternative was death. So, all in all they had incentive to make the best of things.

      Delete
  6. Yer james and Ghost sniper, what you both say is right, but wouldn't it be an advantage, as a species, if mothers could physically be equal to father IF you left the whole historical consequences of rape and forced relocation of brides out of the picture? What I'm saying is is that men being able to force themselves on women had a big advantage re natural selection as the biggest toughest alpha male got to father the most kids. Very politically incorrect view to hold, but I feel it cant be denied.
    Aussie

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't consider the natural selection issue. Very good point and I agree. Up to a point, because you need more than just the Alpha's involved in family units.

      Delete
    2. Most of human evolution was done and dusted by the time we came down from the trees and became bipedal hairless chimps. I once saw a large male chimp anal rape a small male chimp at the zoo once, right in front of mine and other kids, like 20ft away, and the victim in the equation wasn't happy about the proceedings at all.

      Back in the dawn of time all power was with the alpha males, the beta males were little more than "hewers of wood and drawers of water" and got to stand out front of the cave, spear in hand to be Grizzly bear bate. Civilisation has been chipping away at the power of the alpha male now for 1000's of years, till we get to the present day. SHTF its going to be a very steep and painful learning curve for women when we once more see the rise of the alpha male.
      Aussie

      Delete
    3. It probably would have been less traumatic to the kids if the chimps had just flung feces at them. As far as the steep learning curve, I imagine many males themselves will also be surprised, although true Alpha's will be rare or at least restrained as group harmony would suffer otherwise. It is all well and good for chimps, but in humans the loner is much more vulnerable. It isn't that humans can't be Alpha's, it is that the greater strength is with a willing cooperative group. Getting more flies with honey rather than vinegar.

      Delete
    4. “As far as the steep learning curve, I imagine many males themselves will also be surprised, although true Alpha's will be rare or at least restrained as group harmony would suffer otherwise.“


      I never did finish reading the “Earth Abides” novel that was assigned to us in high school English class way back in 1983. But some months back I caught the radio version on the old time XM radio station. I recall a character, a sort of rogue alpha, that just wasn't into any sort of compliance. Long story short, the community killed him.

      Delete
    5. Earth Abides was extremely over hyped. The author was probably a fag or something the Pretty People approved of and so approved of his work. I found a first edition but it was too worn to be worth anything.

      Delete
    6. Don't recall much about it James, since it was 33 years ago now, and it was required reading for the class, but I think it was written in the 1940's. Don't remember it sucking too bad, but it sort of drug on and I never finished it. Now that I think about it though, it was the favorite novel of the communist that I used to work along side, so your analysis of those that it would tend to appeal to is probably pretty accurate.

      Delete
    7. Yep, it was forgettable. Some damn thing about a single character mumbling about everything-and that is barely hyperbole.

      Delete

I must moderate-trust me. You don't want to see what happens otherwise. Sometimes it takes awhile to respond as I only check two or three times a day. No N-Bombs, nothing to get me libeled. Otherwise, have at it. If you criticize me, make sure to praise my hair first.