THE INEVITABILITY OF
ALLOWING THE COLLAPSE TO PRECEDE
Reading someone or other
yesterday I came across a single, sarcastic throw-away line having to do with
the entire electrical industry allowing the inevitable collapse through
deferred maintenance. These comments
always tend to elude to the gross inexcusable greed of businessmen and almost
suggest that better leadership and just a smidge more money would solve this
problem lickity split with little fuss or muss.
Of course, this explanation ( or, suggested explanation as little is
blatantly explained ) leaves a bit a be desired. Granted, the whole thing could have been mere
sarcasm with little intended meaning other than cynicism or even humor. But I can’t just leave things be, when I can
take a simple occurrence and blow it all out of proportion. Therefore, we shall discuss all that is wrong
with both capitalist and fascist viewpoints and then precede to dissect the
inevitability of allowing the collapse to precede. And not only is there no choice but to allow
infrastructure to degrade, it is of course picking up speed, AND has plenty of
company.
*
I used to be a capitalist
shrill. Our economic system could do no
wrong. I studied economics extensively
in the ’80’s and in the ’90’s had little reason to doubt my Austrian Economics
worldview. I distinctly remember (
amidst a time I’ve blocked out most memories due both to years long sleep
deprivation, the trauma of losing my children and from being flung into the
working poor pool from the relatively lofty heights of middle class ) my
monthly extravagance of getting a copy of Forbes magazine ( Fortune was too
generic for me-and the last time I could barely afford a subscription to The
Economist was nearly ten years prior ) and sitting in a coffee shop reading it
and eating the midnight special price breakfast ( eating, with tip, and the
magazine all under $7 if I recall correctly ).
I had just walked to the brand new Wal-Mart Super-Center to buy my $10
worth of weekly groceries. What a great
time to be poor! Sure, I was in the
process of divorcing, most of my $25k a year job ( this was early ‘90’s, and a
very decent wage ) going to support the soon to be ex living elsewhere with the
kids, with only a few hundred a month for my own budget, but everything was so
affordable. I did like most
undereducated folks do and attributed it to our political/economic system
rather than our control of the energy supply.
*
And once I discovered the
role in surplus energy in an economy, I sure as heck wasn’t all that in love
with capitalism any more. Granted, you
can live under worse and I’m well aware of that. But after Enron and the Tech Wreck and
American gun companies pushing for weapons bans to sell their own low quality
crap at higher prices, plus much more, I still accept our system as better than
some but I’m no longer a blind follower as I was twenty years ago. I grudgingly accept the illusion of a free
market knowing full well our system is fascist as big corporations are playing
footsy with government for the mutual benefit of both. So I tend to look at both views, wanting
capitalism to work but knowing our current practicing one is deeply
flawed. What I’m getting at is that I
look a little deeper than just “free market” greed at fault, or for that matter
falling for the myth that less government is only good. I can see both sides, both for more and for
less intervention. Actually what we have
is the worst of both worlds, just like in medicine.
*
In health care, you can do
almost as well with 100% public funded health care or with 100% fully free
market health care. With a public
system, you have almost no cost doctor education so salaries can reflect that
and close to no cost drugs ( public university sourced ). With a free market system you can get costs
lowered with competition and no regulation.
So what does America do? The
inefficiency of government regulation with the high cost of monopoly education
and a crippling tort disincentive. We
didn’t stick to the relative low cost on either end but met in the middle with
no benefit to any except those that have gamed the system. Part of the Casino Economy which has
distorted so much of our economy to benefit the bankers and their whores. Our whole system is comprised of no
competition due to government regulation which cripples small business ( the
exact entity you need to stay competitive ).
*
So, when it is artfully
suggested that greed is at the heart of infrastructure neglect, I have a hard
time believing that. Yes, corporates are
insanely greedy bastards. The CEO gets a
$100 million bonus for laying off 25% of the workforce, for instance, or banks
too big to fail pay their workers millions in bonuses taken from government
bailout money. But almost all of our
infrastructure in this country isn’t even private corporations given a monopoly
like the electrical grid. Most are
straight up government owned ( roads and bridges and sewers and water ). And ALL our infrastructure is falling, not
just the electric grid ( although, yes, greed does make things worse and they
should be the first to fail due to both that and the higher danger from hacking
into the control system ). Greed never
helps, certainly. Government
inefficiency and stupidity ( although that is just as relevant with private
companies ) doesn’t help. There is even
public servant greed but is no where near the unbridled avarice of the private
leaders.
*
But who wants the very
structure that makes them money to fail?
Both government job security and private company profits derive from
using infrastructure ( as we’ve talked about before, most private companies believe
in freebies from the government to increase their profits. The Navy protecting Exxon-Mobil’s oil
shipping routes, free land and funding for the railroads, free college to
educate the workforce, etc. ). Why “allow”
that to fail? It makes little sense that
this would be voluntary. More tomorrow.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. IF YOU DON’T SEE
THE AD, DISABLE AD BLOCK ( go to the Ad Blocker while on my page and scroll
down the menu to “disable this site” ). You can purchase anything, not just the
linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other
item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is
placed, I get credit for your purchase. For those that can’t get the
ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or
buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year. Pay your author-no one works for free. I’m nice enough to publish for mere Book
Money, so do your part.***
*Contact Information* Links To Other Blogs * Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *wal-mart wheat
*Link To All My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
*Contact Information* Links To Other Blogs * Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio* my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *wal-mart wheat
*Link To All My Published Books
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
Yep, if they could afford to fix the infrastructure they would do so, if only a token amount at a time, or just enough to maintain (most of) the infrastructure and status quo . But they clearly cant afford to do that. Not for lack of money. They can print that quicker than it can suffer inflation. But for lack of resources. Stone steel glass can be recycled and rebuilt, but energy -once used- is gone forever...
ReplyDeletePublic spending would be a great '30's style stimulas. But it actually has to create things and jobs. At 2 million a mile for asphalt, I guess there is no hope for more involved infrastructure. And people say "$2million" like it is the most natural thing in the world.
Delete"Money" isn't enough. The money has to purchase energy (man hours, machine hours, etc.) And if they start spending money on that the cost of energy will increase too much to offset the advantage of printing the money for infrastructure in the first place. And of course over the past 30+ years it takes more energy to get stuff built because we have put so many layers of regulation and bureaucracy over every step - when it takes 6 months to get all the red tape done to be able to make one small change to the infrastructure. Money as you seem to be using it seems to me to be a synonymy for energy when in fact it is a (usually closely) related thing that can be traded in energy's stead.
DeleteTrue, money is always the default prism, with energy almost never getting its due.
DeleteIn my neck of the woods (not US) the state government took the money that the state owned power network made and used it to fund other government functions (largesse's) instead of reinvesting that money back into the network ensuring it ran.
ReplyDeleteAfter a number of years doing this the network all of a sudden needed a lot of work.
Now prices are through the roof.
You been reading the unibombers manifest, Jimbo?
ReplyDeleteI never actual read that, as interesting as it seems.
Delete