Monday, March 9, 2015

orlov's police state


ORLOV’S POLICE STATE

I hope in the past I have stated my love and admiration for our friend Dmitri Orlov ( I hope I spelled the first name correctly-SpellCheck does not do Slav well ) emphatically enough.  Granted, he took awhile to grow on me.  I was aware but not impressed at first.  Yet, as I became aware of the forest with all these damn trees in the way, his writing started making far more sense and I began an unrequited BroMance.  His books are on my Buy Immediately Regardless list, which is pretty small and exclusive.  Now, having blown sunshine up his, what I can only imagine as bear-like and hairy, ass, I must make enough comments on his 03-03-2015 blog ( Club Orlov dot com ) to create an entire blog article of my own.  First off, see above.  Second, yes, I understand this was one of those “I’m just taking a shot at understanding so please don’t hate me” type of articles I practically invented, so numerous are they.  So, no hate here.  I just think the whole thing is so far from hitting the bullseye, I must comment.  The article states, hey, why are losing all our wars?  The point is perhaps, we don’t have to win?  So that our citizens stay afraid and docile?

*

If we fight, say, Libya, and nothing good comes out of it as far as recognizing our strategic goals, the feeling is that we still win because of both the bankers profits and the boogeyman kept alive to pacify the masses.   Am I the only one who sees DC’s incompetence as par for the course rather than an accident?  Who wants to lose wars?  Even central bankers who choose which side to bet heavily on ( the enemy is of course funded and is profitable, but in orders of magnitude less ) need their winner to prevail.  Just because Hitler was funded didn’t mean there was anything left at the end to cash in on.  And, let’s just pretend yet another intelligent writer didn’t pick up the trendy topic of the day and try to prop up that dusty bitch from twenty years ago.  The American police state was started up in the 80’s as the War On Drugs was fed accelerant, although at the time few of us noticed as we were busy trying on pastel colored sleeveless shirts and cool Miami Vice shades.  In the early 90’s, with the Arkansas drug kingpin Clinton putting on a jovial face, mothers were snipered, children were burned alive and false flag terror attacks were tried out for size, along with a prototype voter fraud nationwide.  The velvet glove came off the iron fist as soon as the Soviets freed up enough “intelligence” operatives to start terrorizing the populace ( I’m not blind to decades prior of official state terror tactics, especially in the 60’s, but those were conducted at a populace which retained a sense of rebelliousness against it.  The 90’s on saw blind acceptance in the mainstream as the masses were bought off with the first break economically speaking in generations ). 

*

No one wants to say “held indefinitely without charges”, most likely because all the poser fake chest beating macho semi-auto clutching “pry from my cold dead fingers” morons feel kind of stupid for not saying a damn thing about it years ago, even though it does hold the Constitution up for combustion quite nicely.  Who needs a new and improved police state with all the compliance going on?  Unless they are starved, no one is going to rebel.  Why would there be any need to fight scrimmages with savages to keep the population afraid?  And the military industrial complex never needed a war.  They just needed spending for a future war.  So, what is my take on Orlov’s question as to why we are suddenly losing all our wars?  Perhaps because a system on the downward trajectory of empire does that.  And perhaps because we broke the cardinal rule of the lesson from Vietnam- don’t fight in economic system depleting major wars, only in small un-losable ones.  Iraq might not have had a major adversary ( not after ten years of embargos and bombings ), but we got sucked into a guerilla conflict that we threw very expensive ordinance against, for far too long, and that, right along with the worst timing ever of Peak Oil, kicked our ass ( of course, having another couple of wars going didn’t help ).  We are finished as a viable entity, militarily ( because of the fragmentation of nation states in a lot of places, there are no conventional armies for ours to fight, and nation state wars are expensive and need to end quickly ), economically ( don’t forget the $16 trillion that went JUST to foreign bank bailouts to keep the system from collapsing, nor the $1+ QUADRILLION in derivatives waiting impatiently ), morally and in every other facet.  As Rome couldn’t defeat the last of its foes, neither can we.  Iraq was about PetroDollar dominance ( among other things ) and by the middle of that conflict we were so screwed we had to bribe all the factions with claims on the potential oil wealth just to make it look less like a defeat.   And now, we can’t even do something as simple as keep China from its chosen oil patches in Africa.  Why do we keep waiting for a clear warning collapse has begun when it is in our rearview mirror?  Even the most casual study of empires past provides enough parallels to be instructive.  Weather change has already been here and done that.  Militarily we are impotent ( this detracts nothing from the individual valor, but says everything about our incompetent leadership ).  Economically it was game over years ago.  The soil was long ago depleted and energy supplies declining.  Damn, you need a map tattooed on your forehead?

END
 
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase.  For those that can’t get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.
*
The Old Bison Blog on CD 
Over five years of work and nearly two million words of pure brilliance. Here is the link to order:
http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I                        
Also as a free e-book, but not cleaned up or organized, at Lulu
 my bio & biblio
*
My books on PDF ( ALL free!!  If you like it, most are available for sale in paper versions )  available at
http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=james++dakin&sorter=relevance-desc
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there.
 
 
 

4 comments:

  1. My version is thus, "Do I need to scribble it right on your dizzy eyeballs with a big red marker?"

    It hasn't been about winning for a long time, it's about spending. Look at the number of defense contractors and suppliers, they all get a piece of the pixelized cake. Speaking of cake, Sara Lee is a defense contractor because it supplies all sorts of products to the military, and not just 3" pound cakes in tin cans either. I saw a list of defense contractors and suppliers on Lew Rockwells site a few years ago and it was an eye opener. Then I looked into how the larger corporations are interlaced together and it became apparent there is a whole nuther world in existence here that us little folk on the ground aren't supposed to know much about. The massive financial inertia of the whole thing may keep it drifting forward for a very long time.

    If I loan $100 to A and A loans it to B and B loans it to C and C loans it to D then A defaults, what happens to the $100, and B and C and D?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Then ANOTHER $100 gets loaned, but at lower interest. They can do that all day long. Until they can't.

      Delete
  2. "Am I the only one who sees DC’s incompetence as par for the course rather than an accident?"

    No disrespect at all intended toward the military, but I'm sure that the pussification and PC indoctrination of our society is also partially to blame. When what should be battle hardened warriors are put through "sensitivity training" to avoid offending the weak among them, you've pretty much lost the battle already, if not in spirit. Look at the way the Russians train. They'll actually get beat up in basic training while learning to fight. The Russians don't fight PC wars. Which should have been the first sign to the U.S. government after 10 years of Russian invasion, that the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan was not going to go very well for us.

    So while our troops are covering their butts from the "fighting sodomites" (See link below) the opposition is doing what needs to be done to keep their troops effective, and actually fighting a no holds barred battle against the enemy.

    The fighting Sodomites motto: Never leave your "Butties behind"

    http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads18/army1293209409.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Weeeell, I'd say PC consequence rather than cause. PC is just divide and conquer.

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED