DEFLATED WAR
Every time I hear someone
worry about going to war to boost the economy I must choke back bloody bile,
and every once in awhile when I hear that deflation will beset the economy I
must wonder what in the Hades these people are smoking and if it is in one of
the states it is now legal. Let’s, once
again, try to dispel the myth we are once again going to war to counter this
depression. To begin with, we’ve been at
war since 1939. Well, that’s not
necessarily true, you might make a case that we started war in 1914. But since that was a bankers war and not the
military industrialists war it really doesn’t count for our purposes here. True, before Pearl Harbor it was also a bit
of a bankers war with Lend-Lease programs but this time rather than simply
making money we were setting the table for empire acquisition. We loaned Britain out of its empire, trading
ships for islands and bases. We gave
enough equipment to the Soviets so they could bleed Germany for us. This time we had the oil and the idle factory
capacity and most of the gold.
*
Don’t forget all that idle
hydroelectric in the wilds of Idaho, either.
Supposedly built for irrigation, in an area almost no one farmed,
somehow it just happened to be a public works project that conveniently was
available for mass aluminum smelting to construct tens of thousands of
aircraft. And the draft started way
before Poland was invaded, another supposed make work program that had nothing
to do with preparing for war. And OF
COURSE that elite ivy league puke FDR that stole all the gold and devalued the
dollar 40% overnight within days of his inauguration was ONLY trying to help
out his little poor buddies and NEVER saw the Japanese attack coming and would
NEVER have involved us in a European war unless it was for, you know, democracy
and stuff ( in my more fevered moments I even wonder if Germany had declared
war on us in the first place. Many signs
point to our chomping at the bit to get into war far before it began, Peal
Harbor was encouraged with our embargos and China was the excuse-at the time we
made no effort to hide our distain for Ornamentals and it defies logic that we
actually cared about the rice eaters except as it suited our purposes ).
*
Now, let’s assume the war
was THE original Oil War and we won, all the oil used to win the war more than
compensated for by the agreement with the Saudi’s. And eventually our oil companies taking
colonial British and French production as well.
Let’s assume that the war bringing us out of the economic Depression was
a secondary goal. Not necessarily to
help the poor eat, although that forestalling revolution was a factor, but
mainly by getting money flowing to the corporations again. And let’s assume that nuclear weapons or no,
we could never hope to fight the Soviets, despite what Patton thought ( we both
fought just as the War Of Northern Colonization was fought, cannon fodder
backed by factories. They had much more
than we did and didn’t have to ship it overseas. We would have eventually lost-and remember
Patton believed in reincarnation so he was pretty much coo-coo for coco puffs
anyway ), so we ceded half the globe to them, mostly keeping the good
parts. The lesson in all that? We were the globes premium oil producer, and
probably its steel producer, and we still needed the Russians to win the
war. Compare that to today.
*
We are the worlds biggest
oil IMPORTER. Our Peak Iron Ore was in
the 1950’s. We have no gold ( if you
think we have anything in Fort Knox, I have a central African country I want to
sell you. The Kingdom Of
PrettyPony. Honest, it’s a thing ). We have, in short, NO capacity whatsoever of
waging the kind of war that provides full employment or that stimulates the
economy. What we have had since WWII was
continuous spending of borrowed money to keep our military built up. During the real Cold War, which we lost along
with Vietnam ( after that it was all War On The Cheap ), all that military
spending gave us a huge nuclear arsenal and a true global garrisoning force (
as well as a War In Space ). We could
easily have fought another true world war then, as demonstrated by the Vietnam
War. Look at the helicopter war we
manufactured for, as compared to the leased semi trucks we use today for
logistics. Anyway, since then we have
been living off of the pre-Vietnam arsenal, literally. We still build new crap, as witnessed by our
defense industry turn out, but all we are buying is high tech crap that doesn’t
really work. We throw a lot of debt
dollars at the industry, but all that has been for some time is
financialization. Drones are one of the
few success stories, and those replace a LOT of planes and pilots and bombs,
which just proves the point of a build-down.
*
Even our nuclear arsenal
is nothing but cannibalizing down in numbers.
We still rely on the old arsenal delivery vehicles for them ( not to
argue that less nukes are a bad thing, just pointing out how we are “stripping
the copper wires from the old towns to build a few new buildings” ). Vietnam was the last large industrial war we
could actually manufacture for and fight.
Since the 1990’s our military industrial complex has been shrinking, the
last war fought with money instead of machines ( money to recruit indigenous
forces, money to bride warlords, money for Intelligence Services and lots of
money for mercenaries ) to a very large extent.
We can create money like nobodies business, but certainly not a large
military force. We can’t even get enough
quality fighters, the feminization of the military for the last thirty years
taking a bit of a toll, unintended consequences of Woman’s Lib and Political
Correctness. Does anyone remember the
huge cut in defense spending in the early Nineties, right after the Gulf War,
that sent the California economy into a tail spin? The Gulf War was financed by everyone else,
not by us! And we still had to cut money
on defense. This has been an ongoing
process.
*
All that money and high
tech and we can’t win in Syria, nor can our equipped and trained Saudi buddies
win in a little Podunk craphole called Yemen.
Granted, this has more to do with other factors such as the exponential
drop in quality across our entire economy as corporations do one thing and one
thing only and I’ll give you three guesses and build anything is the wrong
one. They are doing little more than
just buying back their own stock with earnings, pumping up short term profits
at the expense of mid term survival.
Innovation? Retaining trained
personnel? Ah, most honorable, you are
velly funny boy, velly! The military is
fighting with the latest Windows version ( the one that is made for Homeland
Security ) in its computers, in effect.
I would wager this is the last stock bubble, not because the burst will
hold values low for decades, but because there will be little need for stocks
when we don’t have any companies. You
are still thinking in terms of an oil and industrial economy, even as you
witness its implosion. We are all K-Mart
now ( watch the YouTube video by “Company Man“ on that chain ).
*
Now, as far as deflation,
that meme is no where near as widespread or prevalent. It is a niche view, but you can’t help but keep
running across it. ( speaking of YouTube
) “Revolting Man” was just mumbling about deflation by demographics. Now, I like the guy. He seems to have his head out of his ass,
even if he is an AR molester. I’m not
sure how far his understanding of economics, or especially energy, outpaces his
weapons and homesteading knowledge. He
was going on about how when our parents have less children the assets shrink
down to fewer people and hence land is going to get much cheaper because there
will be less people to will land to. To
a point I agree. Over supply leads to
lower prices so that would make sense.
In a vacuum. What about all those
immigrants coming in to replace White babies?
Granted, most live in the urban Section Eight and Food Stamp universe, our
elites trading long term Civil War for a few bits of extra Corporate Welfare
now, and I understand the guy is living in Lily White rural Ozarks, but you’ll
also see White Flight out to these lands from the city so there will still be
upwards price pressure.
*
George (?) Ure down in
rural Texas is a big fan of deflation but he subscribes to those bizarre
economic historical models which REALLY ignore outside forces. And all those who read The Forth Turning,
again, ignore our energy and empire situation.
Historical trends of energy growth do NOT see our future of energy
contraction. It really is as simple as
that. And another simple concept-you
must have surplus goods and services to see decreasing prices. Do you see the price of homes going down, given
all the foreclosures, over building for Flippers and vacancies? Of course not, the bankers are keeping so
much off the market rentals have predominated and prices are up. Nobody can buy them, but rentals make the
banks more money. You see falling prices
for books, as every swinging dingus believes they can write, and they can at
least publish since no editor is telling them they can’t. Computers are built by everyone and the price
falls. Food would increase more but we
are still in the phase of surplus calories being cut back, rather than base
calories being endangered as it is in a lot of other places.
*
Nobody can afford the old
level of oil use, retail wise, and on the industrial side lack of income leads
to lack of manufacture, so oil is down. This
is all supply and demand. So why do
these folks forget about currency? Our
currency is debt. For forty years fuzzy
foreigners bought our debt to have Treasuries to buy oil. Not now, at least no where on the same
scale. More countries are NOT buying our
debt because they aren’t buying as much oil denominated in dollars. Saudi Arabia agreed to start and enforce the
dollar standard, and now not only are they and their OPEC buddies producing
half the oil they used to, dropping the demand for dollars, many other
countries such as China no longer buy oil with dollars themselves. So, less debt is bought by others. Yet every year we get into more debt, some
years seeing half the budget borrowed.
If foreigners aren’t buying that debt, it becomes domestically
inflationary. So, what deflation? Commodity deflation isn’t the same as
monetary inflation. And even commodity
deflation is only deflation currently because of wage deflation.
*
Don’t be fooled with
temporary product and service deflation, brought about by dips in the
trend. Now, those folks that say we will
see deflation and then hyperinflation, they are correct. How can they not be? We are already seeing deflation in some
areas. Not medical, as the ObamaCare
forced everyone into the market so that the industry inflation ( fed by
demographic forces as Baby Boomers retired, the Boomers on medical welfare )
kept going strong until now they are on par with the defense industry. Not rentals or homes as just described. Not even automobiles. Sure, the loan bubble on them popped, but car
ownership in general has surpassed a lot of folks falling income. The overall ownership costs will remain
high. Any deflation you see is
temporary, by definition, since it is commodity based rather than
monetary. Yet, even if purchase prices
fall, ownership costs do not. Auto
insurance increases, as does property tax.
Road taxes increase as fewer folks drive, and the evictions paralleling
the Great Depression will now be, as before, mortgage based, but now also tax
based. How quickly we forgot the 2009
city and county drops in service as taxes doubled. Count on inflation in prices, overall, not
deflation.
END ( today's related link http://amzn.to/2hD0CO9 )
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
Supply and demand fails when the economy is centered on government induced monopolies. Come to think of it the Feds low interest has added to the monopolies by financing take overs and buy backs.
ReplyDeleteI guess in the end all economic analysis is flawed due to the controlling interests and money channeling.
DeleteMilitary technology is just the war mongers way to suck more taxpayer money using less physical resources.
ReplyDeleteHa! I like that one-didn't even think of it like that.
Delete