Monday, February 19, 2018

funding gore 1 of 2


FUNDING GORE
*
note: incredible knives.  I carry and use all the time.  $3 each.  I bought ten for $2 each but these are still more than worth it at 50% more.  Even if you are required to buy multiples-a very good idea-to get free shipping, I'd highly recommend.  From Bud-K click here
*
I want to talk about the fallacy of believing in Gore Warming.  I’m not pimping for Global Cooling to replace it.  I’m just warning against irrational belief systems.  This is merely an exercise in critical thinking that will help you in other areas ( which guns to choose, which foods to store, where to live in safety, etc. ).  I’m not saying I can disprove Gore Warming, or prove Solar Cooling.  That would be a damn waste of my time.  The weather is changing, it is going to screw up our food production system, we are the biggest idiots in the world if we think we can change any of that, and you need to prep for change no matter the form it takes.

*

Look, you know people are already trying to kill you.  Medical hacks with chemotherapy or treating diabetes with the foods that cause it, or even admin heavy hospitals ruining you financially for their job security.  Multicultural warriors importing Muslim militants.  PC advocates giving Black insurgents Get Out Of Jail Free cards.  BigAg corporations feeding you poison.  It stands to reason people will try to kill you in the future.

*

How?  Who knows?  And who the hell cares?  Everyone will be trying to kill you.  Government civil servants, gang members, fundamentalist religious Jesus Freaks, it doesn’t matter.  So why should it matter what kind of weather is going to kill you?  One or the other will.  Even Gore’s sycophants would be foolish to only plan on hotter weather.  Certainly they also see the need to protect against unseasonable frosts and longer winters at times, simply because the whole climate is getting screwy with the weather.  How hard is it to plan on either/or?

*

Why are we even wasting time debating about Gore Warming?  All the time, everywhere I go to read about something else, I either have to put up with “Trump is the devil here to ruin everything”, or “it’s all about Gore Warming and we are all going to die”.  I want to say it is misdirection obscuring Peak Oil and overpopulation, and it might well be, but that is an effect, not a policy.  I think the simplest explanation is the correct one.  Gore is a barber who everyone is asking if they need a haircut.

*

First off, we need to agree that Democrats and Republicans are both sides of the same coin, the Imperial Party.  Elections are Kubuki Theatre.  It doesn’t matter how much elections cost because they are a sight cheaper than revolution.  It is all digitally printed money anyway.  If a corporation gives to a candidate it is tax deductible, and politicians WILL repay them because corporations buy the politician, not the politics.  To say that a corporation funds anti-Gore Warming is true, but no corporation funds politicians against their interests.  Even if a politicians claims to fight against warming, if they got money from an Evil Corporate Anti-Warmer, they are just paying lip service.

*

Gore is just paying lip service to preventing warming.  If man was able to stop it, which he can’t because American politicians cannot pass Chinese laws and the Chinese are doing all the manufacturing, than Gore wouldn’t WANT to stop it because that is his meal ticket ( I don‘t know how much Warming is factories and how much is autos, but I don‘t know any Gore Warmers who have given up driving ).  The reason the term Gore Warming resonates is because before that idiot threw the election and got paid off, Warming wasn’t the huge deal it pretends to be today.

*

I don’t know why Gore chose to become the Warming Czar as his price of pretending to give up the election ( Democrats pretending to fight the election gave the illusion there were two parties instead of one ), although I’d guess that it was because it was the low hanging fruit.  Tree huggers might have been pushing the issue for decades but it wasn’t a Public Enemy Number One like it supposedly became.  Why is it still an issue?  Because there are government grants to those that believe in it.  Why does the government push the agenda?  I don’t think that it does.

*

The government funding different religions has a long history.  The elite a hundred years ago hated Negro’s ( as much as they pretend to love them today ) and funding for eugenics and Planned Parenthood ( abort babies, preferably Black ) had a purpose ( and yes, I’m calling eugenics a religion since it was faith based ).  All the studies “proving” their utility might have been by fanatics, but I’d wager most were just in it for the funding.  They believed in what they were paid to believe, since money was their religion.

*

What does the elite want today?  It was about control back then, as it is today.  Is it about One World Government or Communism, or Zionism or anything else?  I doubt it.  It is just about money.  A century ago, there was enough surplus to allow for the luxury of social engineering.  Today, I don’t think there is.  I think everything is about money control and everything else is unintended.  To maintain the illusion of control by the voters, the two party system illusion is kept alive and well.  Gore was asked to name his price.

*

He chose Global Warming.  Perhaps because he is a fat and lazy politician who doesn’t like to work hard and Warming was already a hobby horse he was familiar with.  It was Voter Hallucination Drugs, just like all the other issues.  Gore saw how dopey eyed Democrats and ilk ( commies, socialists, etc ) loved to hug trees and picked a underutilized underexploited field to make political hay off of.  Then it turned into a cash cow when his lack of political career endangered his wallet. 

*

If there was no Al Gore, would there ever have been Global Warming?  Remember, we don’t solve problems.  We solve perceptions of problems.  Just because we no longer irradiate the population while setting our rivers afire doesn’t mean there is no pollution.  There is just an illusion of no pollution ( even as there are those fighting the obvious pollutants, they are ignored since Warming is getting all the grants ).  As there is an illusion of Warming.  It is only a problem because the profit seekers decide it is a problem.  Whether it is or not is immaterial.  It is merely payola and graft showing up.  Continued tomorrow.

END ( today's related link http://amzn.to/2F5d1Ta )
 
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. ***You can make donations or book purchases through PayPal ( www.paypal.me/jimd303 )
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods or buy a book. If you don't do Kindle, send me a buck and I'll e-mail it to you in a PDF file.  If you donated, you may request books no charge.   My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184
*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

 

18 comments:

  1. Warming is only a major problem for 2 reasons - the weather/climate gets unpredictable, and the sea levels rise. A new normal will likely get established before the race goes extinct - but almost everyone lives within 30 vertical feet of the oceans, which means warming related sea level rise combined with increased storm surges (and reduced warning lead time about the storms) and the population will be washed out to sea. New Orleans and Katrina for almost EVERY major city (Denver will be o.k. until the refugees get there...).
    Global cooling prevents that sort of flooding disaster and population die off instead having more droughts and food supply disruption - starving people are more dangerous than people fleeing their flooded sheetrock hovels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't cooling keep folks there in their seaside city, even as they starve? Or, better, people leave Denver and the Great Basin for parts South. Is that what you just said? Sorry, read it three times and its not clicking. I thought I had enough coffee already.

      Delete
    2. Nah, it is a choice of poisons between global cooling and global warming. Both are massive disruptions, one leads to a more direct die off (warming) thanks to the coastal flooding during storms, the cooling option leads to increased likely hood of civil unrest due to starvation. Either way we are hosed, but how hosed and in what manner might matter.

      Delete
    3. The devil is in the details. Do the Ozarks get invaded by coasties? Does the entire West enter into a fifty year drought?

      Delete
  2. My thoughts are that it almost doesn't matter. New Ice Age or back to one of the other at least 4 times that the global average has been hotter. It will come at a time of energy contraction to a degree that society has never seen. If it is a magor worminmg trend...without cheap energy the masses cannot live in southern coastal areas. I want to see you live in a high rise on Miami Beach with out grid power for the elevators and A/C. It will not matter if the ocean rises 8 inches or 8 feet. No one will be left there any way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The masses can live in southern coastal areas, just not in conventional homes. Tear out a couple of walls, put in screen. Viola!

      Delete
    2. 3 -4 floors up and get the illegal fishing nets, and your coastal condo will be fine - until a storm knocks it over.

      Delete
    3. How yummy are oil dispersing agents mixed with Fuki radiation?

      Delete
  3. It won't really matter the results of the weather itself. Mankind will adapt to any weather, provided they have gear, shelter, and power/water/services. 'Ricans are in camping mode on their island with no power, in non permitted/proper constructed houses. If we can get a good ice age going and die off of 90 percent then minions can carry on on the edges, hunt-gather, bartering de -constructed city remains. Painting their hands on cave walls, good fun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Right. It isn't about living in a brave new colder/hotter world, its needing to get rid of all the surplus so we can do so. Damn mouth breathers.

      Delete
    2. In some of the more hostile climes where modern technology has made more hospitable (Northern Europe comes to mind). When technology fails those areas are not going to be able to support the surplus population. I suspect the immivaders there will fare poorly

      Delete
    3. The Muzzies in NorEurope will most likely be wiped out soon enough, about the time any serious shortages start. The Nazi's kept the Jews around for labor. The Muzzies can be killed in place by mobs with pipes and rocks-far less logistics involved.

      Delete
  4. I’ve seen those knives that you linked at BudK before. Looks like a Mora knock off, but it’s stainless instead of high carbon steel. No biggie, unless you prefer the edge retention abilities of high carbon, or plan on striking hard rocks with the spine, for fire making. I’ve got a lot of cheap knives from that site, and many of them were built like a tank.

    The free shipping promos are great if you’re spending small. But sometimes the 30% off, if spending X amount, saves more. But of course, only if you have a need to spend more. Free shipping is slower than Rosie O’Dumbbell leaving a Dairy Queen, but eventually it gets there :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do we not see Rosie any more because the Dems are pimping Opra for Prez now?

      Delete
    2. Hmm? Wasn’t aware that Mz O’Dumbbell had planned on making a run (or rather in her case, a waddle :D ). I had heard Elizabeth Warren (nuttier than Squirrel shit) Oprah, and the latest, Joe Biden.

      But nothing could ever be a bigger national embarrassment than Obummer himself. He wouldn't have even made a good third shift manager at a McDonald's off of route 95 somewhere! And I wouldn't have bought a used car from him at some lowlife, six car, hole in the wall business either. When I think about what he MIGHT have been qualified for I think of things like septic tank repairman assistant and cattle ejaculate collection technician :D

      Delete
    3. Sorry if I didn't phrase that properly. I meant "was the spotlight taken off Rosie because Oprah is running for Prez?". Obammy was never qualified for any job except sucking the peanuts out of my spoor. But I like how you put it! :)

      Delete
    4. Rosie ran either last election or the one before that.

      Delete
    5. Really? I had no idea. Okay, THAT explains the confusion, not my "English as a second language".

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED