Saturday, February 16, 2019

war stimulus dead


WAR STIMULUS DEAD
Here is another subject I have to keep revisiting as I continue to see offhand comments to the contrary, which REALLY frigging bug the crap out of me. Like the “Venezuela is socialist and hence failing” meme.  I can’t believe people suck up that intelligence services propaganda and give it nary a thought.  They didn’t learn with Cuba, or Iran nor North Korea.  You rail against MSM, know they are lying liars and yet pick and choose to believe anything that titillates your preconceived notions.  EVERYTHING they say are lies.  They are Pravda.  It behooves the PTB to discredit targeted states.
*
Anyway, before I go off on a three additional article rant-and you know I will!- a return to topic on war as a racket and as an economic stimulus.  The standard War Of Northern Colonization explanation is “Free Da Slaves”.  Which, seriously, I cannot believe anyone buys into.  The North hated Darkies.  Almost every northern state had anti-Black residency and work laws.  But of course, that is a bit obscure for historical knowledge, so we must simply ask ourselves that simple  question “who benefits?”.  A Nicaraguan occupation by Marines pays a fruit company and the Senator they elected.  Who gets paid with emancipation?
*
Nobody.  Nobody is going to go to war, risking their lives, to “right a wrong”.  Individuals might go to war for fun.  Just to fight.  Such as going to Spain and volunteering.  But not nations as a whole.  Someone must be benefiting.  Wars are expensive and deadly.  Why would Yankee Scum bleed the treasury and its armed forces, and hence weakening itself towards other powers ( hint: England ), just because “slavery to un-cool, yo!”?  Are you that retarded?  We didn’t go and invade Europe Just Coz we felt bad for their loses to the Nazi’s.
*
We went over there because the war was the best thing for the economy.  As individuals, three hots and a cot even while getting shot was better than starving at home ( and now you know why with all his socialism FDR didn’t feed people.  Imperial conquest was prepped for long in advance ).  For the economy as a whole, war was great for full employment and production.  Eighty years previously, war was what turned us into an industrial economy.  Did you ever stop and ponder how the slavery question impacted the two economies?
*
Wonder how Alvin Toffler got so popular so fast, from nowhere?  He wasn’t much more than a freelance writer prior to the publication of “Future Shock”.  Yeah, he was a talented writer, don’t misunderstand.  But he came along when computers were expensive calculators and he foresaw all of our glorious technological future?  In retrospect, to me it seems like he was fed from a think tank, propaganda pushing us to accept a post-industrial future ( planting the embryo ).  He did have plenty of good historical insights, one of which was that the Civil War was an industrial war over agriculture.
*
The Industrial Revolution was at least as old as our Revolutionary War, but we were still invested in an agriculture economy.  Even all the water powered mills and trains and water transportation up in GottDamnYankeeLand were still heavily dependent on agriculture as feedstock.  And the South had far too much power over the North economically, as they were dominant in agriculture.  The South wanted the North to pay its fair share in taxes supporting the government and the North wanted the South to give them all the agricultural commodities at no to extremely low cost.
*
The macro forces at play, of course, was that the new imperial economic paradigm was industrial.  America has ALWAYS been imperial, but we just called it Western Expansion back then.  The South had expanded right up to its natural hydrologic borders and was screwed just from that alone.  The North could expand indefinitely utilizing many more resources.  Growth IS wealth and the South couldn’t grow but the North could.  Slavery had nothing to do with it except as propaganda and the added benefit that you can’t let slaves operate your capital equipment-it was far too valuable.
*
Britain didn’t outlaw slavery because they were nice people ( ask the Irish ).  They did it because a worker gives up his freedom for wages but a slave fights for his freedom.  That leaves aside the question of rebellions against becoming wage slaves in the first place, of course.  But once accomplished, slavery had no use in an industrial economy.  One almost has to wonder how much financial backing the industrialists gave abolitionists.  There were hardly any Blacks up North, so why did factory owners care?  They wanted a broke and destabilized South so as to offer dirt cheap agriculture commodities.
*
A South with slavery had high fixed costs and high profits for slave owners.  A South without slavery would be the equivalent of the Irish ghettos in New York and other industrial cities ( remember that the Bronx and Brooklyn at one time had factories-one factor in the metro’s 70’s misfortunes ).  Just a bunch of starving freemen willing to sell their labor cheaply.  Remember where the desire to free slaves comes from-greed and viewing all races of the lower classes as cattle.  If you don’t want to believe that because you want to rap your way into the 1%, you are deluded.
*
Pre-Civil War the era was messy and multidimensional and multifaceted, in the economic, political and cultural ( hey!  Just like today.  It ain’t JUST about red or blue now, either.  Follow the money ).  The Industrialists might have just been content with propaganda, playing the long game.  Lincoln might JUST have been (s)elected by the rail barons for government subsidized track.  They might not have realized how toxic he was to the South ( probably far worse than Trump ).  Or, they could have.  Who knows?  Even going to first hand accounts of the era, there was still bias.
*
Even if war was a surprise to everyone, it was the first Industrial War ( logistically, at first, then perhaps later tactically and strategically.  It was messy and anachronisms abounded, but it was also amazing how quickly it became a Total War economically.  Only the lack of oil kept it static, just as it would in WWI ).  Where before war was costly and limited to land for its payoff, war became profitable on to itself.  Even to the nation funding it, not just those in the supply industry.  War became more costly than ever, but it was also profitable.
*
Bankers and industrialists were the beneficiaries, but for the nation as a whole, conquest begat more industrial power allowing more conquest.  Iron and coal ( later on, steel and oil ) was an exponential power over wheat and oxen.  It wasn’t as if factories and metal weapons hadn’t been around forever.  It was that now, machines replaced labor.  That was the crucial difference.  Grain might be renewable, more so than coal, but just as grain replaced hunting and gathering with its superior stored calories, carbon fuels were a military technology with far more concentrated energy.
*
Tomorrow, I’ll work towards covering war economies, the break down of the model, the inevitability of a professional high tech force and how those are incapable of duplicating the economic benefits of industrialized war.
( .Y. )
( today's related Amazon link click here )
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303 

*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).
*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com  My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.
*** Pay your author-no one works for free.  I’m nice enough to publish for barely above Mere Book Money, so do your part.*** junk land under a grand *  Lord Bison* my bio & biblio*   my web site is www.bisonprepper.com *** Wal-Mart wheat***Amazon Author Page
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there

7 comments:

  1. War, like bad weather is always "around". It's familiar reoccuring tones with near regularity gives an astute minionite a head's up over the other refugees. As war is a more economic impetus versus emotional or tribal causation, minions should seek to use it for their own interests. Not falling into the ranks of volunteers marching in parades, just seeking to capitalize on the events. Operate a whore house or saloon off post for the brigands. Be a black market or looted contraband intermediary. Have scavenger kids clean up gear quickly after chaos of conflicts. Etc. If things go hot in CONUS or your village there will be opportunities to be on the profit or advantages curve of events. Hiding underground or being fed soylent in camps are not opportunities that are for one's betterment and might as well get your share.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Slavery is dumb from an economic perspective.

    A sh**lord I was reading said he'd go onto some media platform where you talk to random people. He reckons he'd ask African Americans why they think *anyone* would want them as a slave. Or some nonsense like that. Apparently they'd be blown away with the realisation that they wouldn't cut it. The smarter amongst us realise that if we're no good as slaves what use do powerful people have for us?

    I feel like a slave. As stefan Molyneux (that name belongs on a Gillette razor user) once opined "free range slaves". I definitely pay more in tax than I get back in value because .gov spends the dosh on minorities for the feelz. LOL it's funny to me because I'd rather laugh than get angry

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As for getting more back than you pay, that is impossible. The government "borrows" the money for spending, meaning they only pay the interest and never the principle. Even straight up welfare bitches are just bought votes and pacified peasants. And the rich who pay 60% of all taxes are only paying money on a crooked system they abuse. It actually is funny when folks get worked up about it ( I've done it too ) because aside from sabotaging the actual physical infrastructure, we are all participants.

      Delete
    2. I would be of the opinion that profiting off the misery of others during peacetime is tolerated but during war I would think u would end up on the wrong end of a bayonet.

      2:48

      Delete
    3. You could end up on a bayonet anyway, for no reason. But point taken.

      Delete
  3. Did you hear about Lincoln’s response after recovering from his 4 year drinking binge?


    “I freed who?” :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. From what I've heard of his wife, he had to keep drinking :)

      Delete

COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED