STORM RIFLE 2
Trench warfare would not have been possible without mass
industrialization. It takes a lot of
minerals and chemicals and transportation infrastructure to pound an enemy
around the clock, for years, with automatic weapons and artillery shells. The War Between The States never would have
seen the duplicate use of machineguns, even if Gatling had prevailed earlier
and sold his guns wholesale. Because,
you see, while the Generals in World War One were mostly wrong as can be in
copying Civil War strategy and tactics, those involved in the War Of Northern
Aggression were mostly right. Rapid fire
guns did use up more ammunition than could be produced or transported ( you
could also say: Cavalry was
effective. Trenches were useful, but not
permanent. Fighting spirit, élan, armed
men with bayonet could carry the day ).
But by 1914, industrial capacity was exponentially better than
1861. Miles of trenches could have
overlapping fields of fire from Maxim style machineguns, and they could fire as
long as needed to repulse attack.
Ultimately, trench warfare could not be duplicated in the next war once
the tank was introduced. Tanks, despite
their attempted use as land based versions of ships at sea, are in essence
mobile machineguns ( their main guns are little more effective than artillery
or aircraft ). It should be remembered
that the main casualty inflictor in WWI was machinegun ammunition. Not artillery ( yes, a close second, but
certainly not as cost effective ). Not
rifles. And certainly not bayonets ( at
something like one half of a percent ).
Tanks countered entrenched machineguns, and were mobile machineguns
themselves.
*
Now, here is where things get interesting. Prior to the tank, it was recognized that
mobile machineguns were a good idea. German
Stormtroopers were specialty units able to sneak across No-Man’s Land and
attack, avoiding the machineguns by stealth, but the military doesn’t do
“stealth” on a wide scale basis. They
wanted mobile machineguns.
Sub-machineguns were already in use, but pistol ammunition is for a
scale bad breath close. And for years,
no designer could design a decent mobile machinegun with battle rifle
ammunition. The American BAR was simply
too heavy and only limited ammunition could be carried. So by the end of the war, you had ineffective
submachineguns or limited issue too heavy mobile machinegun prototypes. The tactics were recognized, but the weapon
hadn’t been designed. That had to wait
for the next world war. What few
survivalists seem to grasp is that the final evolution of the mobile machinegun
was meant to be just that. A machinegun,
the premier casualty inducer. And
machineguns, while nicely aimed by the expedient of every fifth round a tracer
( so that you can correct your aim as if moving a hose and seeing a continuous
stream ), are for all intents and purposes, suppressive fire. You can kill enough of the enemy by using a
factory shifts worth of ammunition, but the main effect of its use is to
immobilize the enemy, so that he doesn’t advance on your position and you can
advance on his. The fact that most casualties were from the machineguns speaks
of asinine frontal assault waves, the rounds being heavy enough to go through
some cover, and the general ineffectiveness relatively speaking of other means
of killing men.
More next article.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter
Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As
long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit
for your purchase. For those that can’t get the ads because they are
blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or buy me something from
my Amazon Wish List once a year. *The Old Bison Blog on CD: Over five years of work and nearly two
million words of pure brilliance. Here is the link to order:http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I Also as a free
e-book, but not cleaned up or organized, at Lulu
*Contact Information* Links To Others* Top 20 Survivalist Fiction* Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio
*My books: http://bisonprepper.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-book-links.html
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
*Contact Information* Links To Others* Top 20 Survivalist Fiction* Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio
*My books: http://bisonprepper.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-book-links.html
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
oops James you're entering dangerous territory. Whole books have been written to the genesis of the assault rifle.
ReplyDeleteIf you mention WW1 then you have to mention the Chauchat LMG, which was made for mobile, suppressive fire and was mass-produced in small workshops, much like the Sten would be later several decases later. It was the first weapon of the "20th century". Contrary to the US-led propaganda it was functionning quite well, only the US-manufactured .30-06 version was a disaster.
You also have to mention the submachine gun and for instance the role of finnish tactics into this.
As I said, it is a complicated story, a journey of many small steps.
By necessity I had to gloss over most if not everything. Once you read all four parts you should get a feel for where I was going.
Deleteright at the end of ww1 the US developed a 32cal semi auto converstion for the bolt action battle rifles. The bolt of the rifle was removed and what in effect was a semi auto 32 cal pistol took its place allowing the use of the same trigger and barrel and had something like a 15 or 20 round magazine feeding in from the top. The idear was that when the soldiers were going over the top in attack they would blaze away at the enemy putting them off there game.
ReplyDeleteAussie
I'd never heard of that one. Sounds interesting
Delete