daily ad

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

combat cupcakes


COMBAT CUPCAKES

I’m starting to enjoy this guy:


In short, women have no business in combat for basic physical limitation reasons, not to mention all the other assorted details nobody that is brainless or politically correct- but, I repeat myself- will talk about.  If you are too enthralled with my drivel to go to the above link, one raghead is holding up the severed head of a female and yucking it up for the camera.  You will NOT see this picture in any US military recruitment offices.  Not that recruiters are all that necessary, the economy being what it is in so many areas for so many decades now.  Which does tell you that fems will join also, if they want to be anything other than impoverished breeders.  But joining and being trained for any job that puts them anywhere close to the sharp end of the stick is pretty damn stupid.  Alas, it seems that 18 year old females are about as head up ass retarded as any 18 year old male.  They buy into the propaganda of feminists and the PC’ers.  Hell, even corporate types shovel this kind of crap into their laps, making no distinctions between the physical capabilities.  Look at any entry level job application. “Are you capable of lifting fifty pounds repeatedly?”  Who is going to check ‘NO’ unless they can barely lift more than the pencil it takes to fill out the form?

*

I get tired of arguing with morons.  It is really simple.  Can men have babies?  Even the most ardent FemiNazi butch dyke can’t argue that one, even if you do have to hear all kinds of crap about how they SHOULD have to, etc.  Can women lift half their body weight in combat gear, or wrestle with an opponent with far superior upper body strength?  To equate women with men physically and psychologically, is to deny reality.  The only successful warrior role model that can be used is that of a terrorist, and that is comparing apples to oranges because bushwacking is NOT modern nation state infantry combat.  Now, I could care less what the military does in its stupidity.  I feel for young people tricked into joining, and I pray they will survive one tour of officer trickery and disinterest and official attitude of the peasants being good for nothing more than cannon fodder, and be able to escape.  But when survivalists see this crap from the military, or are just as ignorant and emulate the military or write this crap into post-apocalypse fiction, my ass starts to chap.   Bitches be breeders, and damn good ones.  They are nurturers and far superior than males in this regard.  They bring a completely different skill set than males, and we are all the better for it.  Centerfire firearms are an aberration to the human race, gender difference wise, and should not be considered the norm.  Only with firearms can fems be equal in combat, and even then only under controlled conditions ( this applies to LEO’s, also ).  Aside from last ditch home defense, females have no business fighting.  Not if you want a stable harmonious society.  The Oil Age is NOT how to do things in a Solar Age.

END

Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase.  For those that can’t get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.
*
The Old Bison Blog on CD 
Over five years of work and nearly two million words of pure brilliance. Here is the link to order:
http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I
*
My books available on thumb drive:
 Post-Apoc Movies, ( free )
 Improvised Munitions Book, ( NOW FREE!!! Free, I tells ya! )
 my bio & biblio
*
If my Blogger page ever goes down, I will start to post at my regular web site:
www.BisonPress.com
*
My books on PDF available at
http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=james++dakin&sorter=relevance-desc
*

If you want them on kindle, just search with my full name: James Dakin
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there.
 
 
 
 

13 comments:

  1. This is why you will never be a mainstream survivalist, appearing on shows such as coast to coast am, as other well known survivlists do.

    It's also why you're the only survivalist that I can take seriously. You're willing to tell it like it is, at the expense of popularity, and moving up to the mainstream. Not many left with that sort of dedication, which is why you also have my unwavering respect.

    I left the other mainstream dude years ago, as the PC diarrhea became sickeningly thick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Were you more worried about the viscosity or the stench? But seriously, thanks.

      Delete
  2. I agree with you 99%, James.

    However..........if ISIS (or whatever initials they are using this week) were on my doorstep, I would pick up arms and fight to the death. They are some crazy mofos and I would do everything I could to defend my home. I don't blame these Kurdish girls for joining. This stuff is right on their doorstep.

    Now regarding the modern army. Nope, never felt a reason to join and I will never encourage my daughters to join. Too much rape going on in the ranks.

    And with all the homosexuality in the military, I will do everything I can to keep my son out also.

    Idaho Homesteader

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems the best reason for staying out of the military is their current propensity to keeping you in against your will once you joined. As for the Kurds, they aren't modern Girl Power FemiNazi's. They are traditionalists- or at least far more so than we are. I'd imagine the gender roles are solid there- so if they are fighting they have to with no other choice. Women SHOULD be armed and dangerous, but they should use that as insurance, not as a profession.

      Delete
    2. "Women SHOULD be armed and dangerous, but they should use that as insurance, not as a profession."
      Truer words never written about military and women serving.
      Of course I think it applies to people in general too. But since most males are genetically programmed to at least consider weapons as a good 1st job sort of profession, and all political units (from clan to empire) need those sort of professionals we might as well use those young men in that role. Women should be discouraged but allowed into the armed forces - WITH the exact same standards as the males for any combat roles. Studies show female fighter pilots might,statistically,have a slight edge on males, primarily for reaction times. Otherwise, statistically, the average women are usually slightly inferior than the average male for most combat roles, probably because most combat roles require more upper body strength and less thoughtfulness than the average woman posseses. If there are women who make the standards - let them in (in their own units) in the rolls they volunteer for--- At least until the die off is done and population growth is required again.

      Delete
  3. Jim, I too have been hitting the racontuer site for two weeks now and his ebola stuff is right on. Not to mention damn funny. Highly recommended. As far as women in the military, one spot that they do excel is as spies. Better at it than men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unless the enemy target is a flaming pillow biter, re spies

      Delete
  4. Your oil age comment started spinning some wheels in my head. If food prices have been steadily increasing due to inflation/production costs, and the value of the dollar is only slightly keeping up due to the price of brent crude. Do you think whats happened recently with oil dropping back down to 87$/bbl affect the value of the dollar negatively?
    -Sumdude

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I look at $85-$105 as the new normal range of oil prices ( precluding any major disruptions ). Nothing will change while in this range. The dollar is a zombie currency. As long as it is a petrodollar it is overvalued. As soon as it goes back to being a Greenback, it is worth spit.

      Delete
  5. Feminist: "Women are equal to men in everything."
    Wombat: "Let's end gender division in the Olympics and see how that works out..."
    *waits for stunned silence then cuts off response by laughing and walking away*

    But seriously, I love this equal opportunity, affirmative action bullshit.
    Most of the cops in my sleepy little corner of the world are dainty little waifs of the feminine persuasion. Accordingly the remiaining tough-guys keep a low profile because they know that if things get dicey that their backup is going to drag its heels getting there and be useless when it arrives.

    That's a win as far as i'm concerned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There, from the trenches, a boots on ground view of bitches in combat

      Delete
  6. Your a softy.

    In a duress situation the top women will be better than the reject men. Thus their occasional use in modern warfare. After all, if you are going to hand AKs to eight-year olds (boys and girls), it isn't a stretch to hand them to mature women. These are of course not touchy feely warm hearted situations where the natural division of racial roles would be in effect in any case.

    Historically, some women seem to have fought in a fair number of cultures. I am guessing that it was most common where women had to pay a price to her husbands family and the dowry could not be had. Thus, much as young men went to war to gain honor, etc. Women, in vary rare cases seem to have done so as well.

    Machiavelli made note of mass migratory movements: So great a destruction occurs also when entire peoples and their families move from one place, forced either by hunger of by war, and go in search of a new location, not to rule it but to settle in it and drive out or kill its inhabitants. When a price or republic assaults a region "it is enough to kill [in opposing forces] only those who command"; but when these populations assault they "must kill everyone, because they want to live on that which the others were living on." A war involving a migration or invading population "is cruelest and most terrifying." (from Sebastian de Grazia's Machiavelli in Hell p. 85).

    So given your view of the post-apocalyptic world, why exactly is it that you don't want to arm women? Or even the older children for that matter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In a situation where all immigrants are killed, then it becomes last ditch survival and all fight. NOT if your group are the invaders. As far as 9 y/o boys being armed, they might not have the strength but they have the ability to be trained to be much more aggressive than women. That is your key difference besides the physical. As for historically, given the punishing labor of hand weapon combat, I see no women being capable. Guerrilla attacks is another thing entirely, as is last ditch defense. Gender roles are for the very specific purpose that they work with two different species, male and female.

      Delete

I must moderate-trust me. You don't want to see what happens otherwise. Sometimes it takes awhile to respond as I only check two or three times a day. No N-Bombs, nothing to get me libeled. Otherwise, have at it. If you criticize me, make sure to praise my hair first.