Today and tomorrow we shall endeavor to discuss two different areas of control, gun control and that of food. Specifically, how gun control, while never impossible, might in fact be off of the radar of the elites, or even actively discouraged, and how food control is the thing you should be very afraid of. Food control is next time so for now let’s talk gun control. This has been a bugaboo for survivalists since before there were such type personages, and the most misunderstood since it is a complete emotional issue with few facts untainted by politics or outright fear. And before we begin, no, I am NOT saying AT ALL, that gun control is something you can now stop worrying about. I am merely trying to bring some rational discussion to the picture so you can tamper your fear a bit. Never relax your vigilance, don’t cancel your membership in the NRA ( for as little or as much good as that will do-I’m of two minds on that subject ), but try to look at the subject less passionately.
First, the facts. Gun control is nothing new. New York City was busy with gun control about the time we were creating the false flag attack down in Cuba to get a few juicily islands from Spain. Gun control against Blacks goes way back. Alcohol and gun prohibition announced to the dense that the FedGov had in fact won the war on states rights, they could do as they damn well pleased and if you objected they had a few new jackbooted thugs they wanted to introduce you to. Almost a hundred years ago, that holy of military weapons the handheld fully automatic firearm was taken away from the citizens, making the whiny bleatings of AR owners today relatively immaterial ( I’ll draw an Obama red line in the sand riggghhhht….THERE! No, I mean, right HERE! Wait, no, over HERE! HA! I’m macho! ). Our great granddad was a hell of a lot more of a man than we’ll ever be, and he didn’t bother revolting over a central bank, an imperial war with draft and mass butchery, nor when the gold was outlawed, so we all know you pussy ass, candy ass, bloated windbags aren’t going to do jack crap. Stop making my ass bleed with your posturing. I’ll wager the biggest mass of semi holders in the nation is probably in California, or if not number one close to it, and they have done Jack All for twenty-five years fighting for their gun rights.
Secondly, Oh My Friggin God, Becky! Look at her butt! Well, okay, look at your ass, because you are showing it. All politics is Kabuki Theatre for the masses. Hitler, who know, the guy that learned undesirables sterilization from us, also learned a bit of propaganda from Madison Avenue and Washington DC and probably two-facery from FDR, had the whole mass movement brainwashing thing down pat decades ago, not even relying on the TV yet, still stuck in the radio age. You think you stand a chance now, after decades of practice and perfection? Gun control is just theatre. How much more truth could you possibly ask for after Obammy? We can all agree that Obama was a created hallucination, even if he wasn’t Muslim ( sure, Cassias Clay and Barry both changed their names but were never Muslim, sure ) or an immigrant ( sure, the “mistake” on the Social Security number was easily explainable. After all, the Bureau was so excited to serve The Second Coming Of Black Christ that they were easily distracted ), and was merely the world’s stupidest asswhore who didn’t know basic English ( who wouldn’t pronounce Corps as corpse? ), getting multiple degree’s as part of the Get Free Diploma’s Through The Mail If You Are A Negro program. But can you remember what his gun control laws were?
Any one? Bueller? Obammy was all for no new taxes, until he passed them, no more wars until he extended them, no more detention centers until he kept them open, and he was to the far left of Lenin and Pol Pot, but he never, not even after Sandy Hook or The Midnight Movie Massacre, passed any gun control beyond the occasional ineffectual publicity stunt. If Clinton had been elected, sure, gun control along with nuclear war with Russia, but Hilary was never about politics as much as she was Money For Nothing And My Muslim Chicks For Free. So you are comparing a self professed far left commie, Obama, with a Left In Name Only bitch who actually had a record of gun control, and the commie DIDN’T! What does that tell you? Perhaps that right or left politicians don’t decide if gun control is allowed? Someone, or some ones else, do. What was the worse Obama ever did? Took away cheap 115 year old Russian bolt guns. He was the best friend the AR owners ever had, and I’d wager he came close to selling more of them in eight years than in previous decades combined.
One could almost postulate that the theatre of gun control was, at least recently, a gun industry bail-out. Besides cheap Bolshie bolts being banned ( say that three times fast ), and decades ago Saturday Night Specials, what was the other biggie you can think of? Perhaps the big ban after JFK was killed? What did it EFFECTIVELY ban? The cheaper guns. Almost all federal bans, as well as commercial corporate bans ( think K-Mart or Sears no longer selling them ) take out affordable weapons, being more a ban of the poor owning guns than the citizens outright. Gun bans, outside local political units being the exception, seem to be more about banning the poor from revolting than banning guns ( just like in Soviet Russia, shotguns are okay. Hell, why not? How much of a threat are they to security forces? ). Even at the height of panic selling when you could find a piece of offal AR for $400, it’s effective price was $550 after taxes, license, shipping and mark-up, and few poor folks can afford even that.
Now, given all that, can we make any sense of it all? Besides the obvious War Against Poor? Here is my best guess. And yes, it is mere speculation. One I made five years ago which was never refuted by another term of Comrade Raghead. The Elites don’t want gun control, they still want an armed citizenry ( at least those with more modern guns ). The whole of the population being armed was never a threat to the elites, not for 350 plus years. Rather, they were a FREE tool. The militia are there by law, if you recall correctly. You are by fact of being required to both arm yourself and fight at the behest of the government. So, really, any objections to the draft are more against fighting an overseas imperial occupation than fighting at all. Our pre and post colonial existence was chockablock full of citizen militias fighting the Indians. Sure, they got some free land out of it, as poor dirt farmers, but in the end the Elite made oodles and gobs of money from conquering a continent. With free soldiers, who even at their own expense armed themselves. We turned to a professional full time force once we had the oil surplus to do so, but if you recall the draft was in effect in the nineteen teens and then from the late 1930’s to 1975. The militia might have been placed on hiatus but was never eliminated. After the draft, the militia became important again ( and the militia system was only subjugated by the draft to overcome overseas occupation issues-but the militia and the full time Army were pretty much always complimentary and co-existed ) as our lack of surplus wealth dictated its necessary return.
The French instituted one of the first large scale military draft systems, and we see variations on that theme everywhere. The Germans relied on very well trained reserves. It was a very rigid centralized system, as befits their geological vulnerable position, on a plain surrounded by enemies. The Russians, always reliant on quantity over quality, much more so than the US, relied on always having new draftees trained and ready to go. China for a time used the draft as a employment and national farming supplement tool. America was home of some VERY stick-up-the-ass rich folks who preached that being a tight fisted tight assed frugal miser was the will of the Lord, and they believed that spending one penny on the military was a sin. So you have a non-professional militia arming themselves and being rather casually a fighting force. The Elite RELUCTANTLY spent a few bucks to make a lot of money, spending on a professional force for colonial occupation, but of course not only did the poor have to die in those wars, they also mostly paid for them through inflation ( the rich, the real rich, not those posers like Hollywood celebs or jocks, know how to alleviate the inflation effects of fractional reserve banking ), so even that “sacrifice” wasn’t too outlandish for them ( and, shut up, Dittohead! I don’t hate the rich because they have money, I hate them screwing me and mine for the money. Idiot-sorry, I should be nice, or at least try. But actually “idiot” is being pretty cool in this case ).
We continue tomorrow.
END ( today's related link http://amzn.to/2fn38Y6 )
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
Gun control is one of Pavlovs bells. Us idiots get all jacked up and blind to truth. Terrorism is not a great threat to the US. This fear of eco terrorist stems from some idiot burning down a halfbuilt condominium in the 90's. The gun "problem" isn't guns. Look at Switzerland. The problem is mental. We don't do shit for mentally ill people. We just pump them full of drugs and remove them from their families. We have no tribe! No stable families. Our social life is called facebook. They are crying about the new prescription drug problem, while the alcohol deaths are ten fold. NintyReplyDelete
percent of tv glorifies booze. Just a bunch of idiots spoon fed bull shit and lies. Have a nice day.☺
Now I'm depressed.Delete
There's a drug for that!Delete
Or at least a stiff shot of whisky.Delete
This is sthe first time I saw this explained.ReplyDelete
Even in the much maligned UK, people can still own weapons ( http://www.lannertactical.com/ar15-straight-pull-side-charging-rifle.html ) but it's bothersome and expensive.
Many judges and lawyers I know have weapons at home, and they can't afford to have illegal ones. There will always be a system to own weapons for self-defense.
The question is : is it going to be a right, or a privilege ?
Try owning a gun in California or New York. You can have one in your home, if you are lucky, but don't take it out of the house or use it in self-defense. But if you are one of the beautiful people, you can have a concealed carry license to defend yourself outside, unlike the serfs.Delete
Owning a weapon is one thing. I know people who purchase one, put it somewhere 'safe' and never fire it. I have picked up such items from widows. Maintaining it, much less repairing it, is not part of 'owning' for these people. The weapon is a kind of talisman.ReplyDelete
When it comes to training, developing some level of skill (define 'skill') One in a hundred? Maybe. Naw, one in a thousand.
I owned a guitar once, but never thought of myself as a guitar player.
Around here everyone owns a gun and believes himself Deadly Pistoleros.
My wife tells me, such is better than not having a weapon at all.
I'll confess to having a gun and not being a gun player. It's OJT for me, or not. I do have the whole Sweet Baby Jesus loving me above all others, so there is that in my favor.Delete
If you have the tools, basic familiarity with said tools AND an understanding that you are NOT the best thing since sliced and toasted bread, you are far ahead of the pack when it comes to almost anything.Delete
If you have the supplies to maintain the tool *and do so* and keep it and yourself provisioned well into the decline you will have a much better chance of surviving well into the decline.
Here in Australia, in a round about way, gun control actually aids survivalist/prepers. Guns arnt that hard to get, the process is just tiresome and annoying. This means the great hords of the unwashed arnt armed(with guns at least) to any great extent.ReplyDelete
The only good thing about everyone being armed here is the extra salvage eventually available.Delete