AMIDST A SEA OF ASSHATTERY 2
In the United States, living in the city is no more advantageous than
living in the suburbs, economically speaking.
The old city centers are either in old Rust Belt cities which have
jacked up their taxes in order to survive, or in newer cities such as Phoenix
or Los Angeles which were never meant to be a city and have inflated
infrastructure cost leading to higher taxes.
The suburbs are cheaper tax wise but once commuting is factored in
provide little advantage. Remote areas,
the boonies, usually don’t have either high cost-there is no jobs within
driving distance ( I’ve been told of people living in some remote parts down
South commuting with gas costs at near $1k a month due to distances between
employment. With this arrangement,
making $30k a year is below poverty level, take home pay wise ) and while very
few people pay taxes, there isn’t much cost in governing them. After costs of shelter and commuting and
taxes, urban dwellers are usually are as poor as rural folks earning only
casual income but with a paid for home.
The trick is to get casual employment.
There lies the rub. Without that,
there is no rural survival economically.
It is my theory that the Survival Blog Rawles Rangers in the Redoubt are
mostly those few folks with telecommuter skills that are actually trading up by
leaving behind taxes and commuting costs.
Even paying extra for Idaho land, they come out ahead. They leave zero luxury behind, with less bills. Well, how else to pay for all the
semi-auto’s, right?
*
That leaves the rest of us. The
best we can hope for is small town employment ( okay, correction- small CITY
employment. No small towns have any of
that any more ). No matter how you
slice this pie, without employment there are no preppers, just poor folks one
hospital visit away from starving. So,
survivalists must trade no work in a safer zone for city living and a job. We can’t escape nearby populations. I just moved back six miles into town, and
while I feel less safe, that is just emotional hysteria, not rational
logic. There will be enough warning to
get out, and six miles is nothing on foot if all other transportation options
crap out. Also, six miles is nothing if
the town crowds branch out. Even if the
entire town is vaporized by an asteroid that magically avoids wiping me out, I
have enough neighbors to pose a danger anyway ( about five times as many as
when I moved there-and let that be a lesson to you ). I was less safe there than before, so moving
back doesn’t really magnify my risks all that much. It just feels like it. Rationally, there is only zero danger if you
have zero neighbors with zero nearby villages, and that is none of us. We should be maximizing safety, not trying to
totally eliminate danger, because that isn’t possible. Preaching country retreats without
recognizing the danger is silly. More
next article.
END
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at
the top of the page. You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter
Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As
long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit
for your purchase. For those that can’t get the ads because they are
blocked by your software, just PayPal me occasionally or buy me something from
my Amazon Wish List once a year. *The Old Bison Blog on CD: Over five years of work and nearly two
million words of pure brilliance: available as a free e-book, but not cleaned up or organized, at Lulu
*Contact Information* Links To Others* Top 20 Survivalist Fiction* Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio
*My books: http://bisonprepper.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-book-links.html
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
*Contact Information* Links To Others* Top 20 Survivalist Fiction* Land In Elko* Lord Bison* my bio & biblio
*My books: http://bisonprepper.blogspot.com/2015/04/my-book-links.html
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there
People are your greatest asset and your greatest threat. How to balance those two is really an unknown when times get tough. That is the problem with being a social primate.
ReplyDeleteWe had the solution- tribes. The nation state screwed that up. This collapse will be like no other. No social structure to fall back on, the entire globe depleted of resources.
Delete"Rationally, there is only zero danger if you have zero neighbors with zero nearby villages, and that is none of us."
ReplyDeleteI was discussing this with my brother just yesterday James, and that's pretty much what it comes down to. The only way to escape the eventual Mad Max society that we all face someday (or at the very least, our decendants) would be to literally move far enough out in the middle of no where, to where there would not be another living soul aside from wildlife. You would want to be miles away from pavement like the Rancho Costa Nada dude. In the mean time you would have to fly supplies in, in order to stockpile. This requires a lot of money, and I could pulled it off at one time, but failed to do so. So now just like everyone else, it's just a matter of the most effective compromise.
If you have a credit rating, buy an ATV with cargo capacity. Use for a few months while making payments, to stockpile. Return.
DeleteI guess the sportsman's guide sells firearms now James? I recall the old Mausers from before, but those were pre-1898, and exempt.
ReplyDeleteThis looks like a cute little .22 survival rifle, and not a bad price either.
http://www.sportsmansguide.com/product/index/chiappa-little-badger-single-shot-22lr-rimfire-500092-805367071029-165-barrel?a=1819170
I just saw a 223 AK pistol for under $500. Cool toy!
DeleteBasically, I believe it comes down to living wherever you wish to die. No one will likely survive what's combining !
ReplyDeleteLike you though Sir Jim...
I wish only to live long enough to see what happens.....
And live just long enough to take a few of the bastards out with me. You're my inspiration for that!
DeleteYou need to bring back your old tagline --Last one in the Stew Pot Wins!
ReplyDeleteIdaho Homesteader
So in general terms, what prompted the move? Family? Health? Tactical? $?
ReplyDeleteDo you still have the place you were at? One issue that would have a lot of people wanting to go back into town is age. Rural living, without family help, doesn't seem that likely for most who start pushing into their elderly 60s. A lot of people retire to a place that is suitable for their early retirement years, but a disaster as they get older and need some help. Of course if you have no one to help you, and that unfortunately is not uncommon, than I guess it might not matter much.
Still have the rural acre, still ready for us at a moments notice. The move was because of the new relationship. 58 years old ( I'm 50 ), she isn't really ready to rough it until needed. 15 minutes away by car, 45 by bike, 100 by foot. Bug-out isn't an issue.
DeleteIt isn't just your zip code, in our area, any property located within 15 miles of our towns is dotted with homes of people who commute there to work. Pretty damn dense population - I grew up here and don't recognize the place at all!
ReplyDeleteOnly a very few areas are stable or losing, population wise. It is insane that we have nearly doubled in a mere fifty years. And that number assumes they aren't grossly lying about the number of permanent illegals.
Delete