ORLOV’S POLICE STATE
I hope in the past I have
stated my love and admiration for our friend Dmitri Orlov ( I hope I spelled
the first name correctly-SpellCheck does not do Slav well ) emphatically
enough. Granted, he took awhile to grow
on me. I was aware but not impressed at
first. Yet, as I became aware of the
forest with all these damn trees in the way, his writing started making far
more sense and I began an unrequited BroMance.
His books are on my Buy Immediately Regardless list, which is pretty
small and exclusive. Now, having blown
sunshine up his, what I can only imagine as bear-like and hairy, ass, I must
make enough comments on his 03-03-2015 blog ( Club Orlov dot com ) to create an
entire blog article of my own. First
off, see above. Second, yes, I
understand this was one of those “I’m just taking a shot at understanding so
please don’t hate me” type of articles I practically invented, so numerous are
they. So, no hate here. I just think the whole thing is so far from
hitting the bullseye, I must comment.
The article states, hey, why are losing all our wars? The point is perhaps, we don’t have to
win? So that our citizens stay afraid
and docile?
*
If we fight, say, Libya,
and nothing good comes out of it as far as recognizing our strategic goals, the
feeling is that we still win because of both the bankers profits and the
boogeyman kept alive to pacify the masses.
Am I the only one who sees DC’s incompetence as par for the course
rather than an accident? Who wants to
lose wars? Even central bankers who
choose which side to bet heavily on ( the enemy is of course funded and is
profitable, but in orders of magnitude less ) need their winner to
prevail. Just because Hitler was funded
didn’t mean there was anything left at the end to cash in on. And, let’s just pretend yet another
intelligent writer didn’t pick up the trendy topic of the day and try to prop
up that dusty bitch from twenty years ago.
The American police state was started up in the 80’s as the War On Drugs
was fed accelerant, although at the time few of us noticed as we were busy
trying on pastel colored sleeveless shirts and cool Miami Vice shades. In the early 90’s, with the Arkansas drug
kingpin Clinton putting on a jovial face, mothers were snipered, children were
burned alive and false flag terror attacks were tried out for size, along with
a prototype voter fraud nationwide. The
velvet glove came off the iron fist as soon as the Soviets freed up enough “intelligence”
operatives to start terrorizing the populace ( I’m not blind to decades prior
of official state terror tactics, especially in the 60’s, but those were
conducted at a populace which retained a sense of rebelliousness against
it. The 90’s on saw blind acceptance in
the mainstream as the masses were bought off with the first break economically
speaking in generations ).
*
No one wants to say “held
indefinitely without charges”, most likely because all the poser fake chest
beating macho semi-auto clutching “pry from my cold dead fingers” morons feel
kind of stupid for not saying a damn thing about it years ago, even though it
does hold the Constitution up for combustion quite nicely. Who needs a new and improved police state
with all the compliance going on? Unless
they are starved, no one is going to rebel.
Why would there be any need to fight scrimmages with savages to keep the
population afraid? And the military
industrial complex never needed a war.
They just needed spending for a future war. So, what is my take on Orlov’s question as to
why we are suddenly losing all our wars?
Perhaps because a system on the downward trajectory of empire does
that. And perhaps because we broke the
cardinal rule of the lesson from Vietnam- don’t fight in economic system
depleting major wars, only in small un-losable ones. Iraq might not have had a major adversary (
not after ten years of embargos and bombings ), but we got sucked into a
guerilla conflict that we threw very expensive ordinance against, for far too
long, and that, right along with the worst timing ever of Peak Oil, kicked our
ass ( of course, having another couple of wars going didn’t help ). We are finished as a viable entity,
militarily ( because of the fragmentation of nation states in a lot of places,
there are no conventional armies for ours to fight, and nation state wars are
expensive and need to end quickly ), economically ( don’t forget the $16
trillion that went JUST to foreign bank bailouts to keep the system from
collapsing, nor the $1+ QUADRILLION in derivatives waiting impatiently ),
morally and in every other facet. As
Rome couldn’t defeat the last of its foes, neither can we. Iraq was about PetroDollar dominance ( among
other things ) and by the middle of that conflict we were so screwed we had to
bribe all the factions with claims on the potential oil wealth just to make it
look less like a defeat. And now, we can’t
even do something as simple as keep China from its chosen oil patches in
Africa. Why do we keep waiting for a
clear warning collapse has begun when it is in our rearview mirror? Even the most casual study of empires past
provides enough parallels to be instructive.
Weather change has already been here and done that. Militarily we are impotent ( this detracts
nothing from the individual valor, but says everything about our incompetent
leadership ). Economically it was game
over years ago. The soil was long ago
depleted and energy supplies declining.
Damn, you need a map tattooed on your forehead?
END
Please
support Bison by buying through the Amazon ad graphics at the top of the page.
You can purchase anything, not just the linked item. Enter Amazon through my
item link and then go to whatever other item you desire. As long as you don’t
leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your
purchase. For those that
can’t get the ads because they are blocked by your software, just PayPal me
occasionally or buy me something from my Amazon Wish List once a year.
*
*
The Old
Bison Blog on CD
Over five years of work and nearly two million words of pure brilliance. Here is the link to order:
http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I
Over five years of work and nearly two million words of pure brilliance. Here is the link to order:
http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I
Also as a free e-book, but not
cleaned up or organized, at Lulu
my bio & biblio
*
My books on PDF ( ALL free!! If you like it, most are available for sale in paper versions ) available at
http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=james++dakin&sorter=relevance-desc
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there.
*
My books on PDF ( ALL free!! If you like it, most are available for sale in paper versions ) available at
http://www.lulu.com/shop/search.ep?keyWords=james++dakin&sorter=relevance-desc
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there.
My version is thus, "Do I need to scribble it right on your dizzy eyeballs with a big red marker?"
ReplyDeleteIt hasn't been about winning for a long time, it's about spending. Look at the number of defense contractors and suppliers, they all get a piece of the pixelized cake. Speaking of cake, Sara Lee is a defense contractor because it supplies all sorts of products to the military, and not just 3" pound cakes in tin cans either. I saw a list of defense contractors and suppliers on Lew Rockwells site a few years ago and it was an eye opener. Then I looked into how the larger corporations are interlaced together and it became apparent there is a whole nuther world in existence here that us little folk on the ground aren't supposed to know much about. The massive financial inertia of the whole thing may keep it drifting forward for a very long time.
If I loan $100 to A and A loans it to B and B loans it to C and C loans it to D then A defaults, what happens to the $100, and B and C and D?
Then ANOTHER $100 gets loaned, but at lower interest. They can do that all day long. Until they can't.
Delete"Am I the only one who sees DC’s incompetence as par for the course rather than an accident?"
ReplyDeleteNo disrespect at all intended toward the military, but I'm sure that the pussification and PC indoctrination of our society is also partially to blame. When what should be battle hardened warriors are put through "sensitivity training" to avoid offending the weak among them, you've pretty much lost the battle already, if not in spirit. Look at the way the Russians train. They'll actually get beat up in basic training while learning to fight. The Russians don't fight PC wars. Which should have been the first sign to the U.S. government after 10 years of Russian invasion, that the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan was not going to go very well for us.
So while our troops are covering their butts from the "fighting sodomites" (See link below) the opposition is doing what needs to be done to keep their troops effective, and actually fighting a no holds barred battle against the enemy.
The fighting Sodomites motto: Never leave your "Butties behind"
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads18/army1293209409.jpg
Weeeell, I'd say PC consequence rather than cause. PC is just divide and conquer.
Delete