RAWLES DOES MATH
*note: free books. Kinda collapse, but probably mostly militia porn https://amzn.to/2Jk9NQ0 .
Plague road trip https://amzn.to/2Jlbddh .
*
I’ve never liked Rawles,
but only because of his Yuppie Scum Survivalism ( he used to pretend anyone
could follow his plans by incremental investing, which was how he did it. But recently we can all see the writing on
the wall and know time is short, plus he really started pandering to the bigger
ticket advertisers-the reason I love making fun of FLIR scopes ). Not because of himself personally. I even forgave him from being an officer,
which I thought was mighty big of me ( I met few officers I actually liked,
even fewer that I respected for their competence and none I didn’t fear for the
ability to get me killed ).
*
Whenever I attack his
logic or arguments, philosophy or positions, it isn’t personal. I don’t envy him his success. I say more power to him-he worked hard at
it. More power to him his concrete
bunker atop a mountain, and all his pretty prepper pony gear. If that is your thing, go for it. But Rawles Survivalism is like Army
Intelligence. Fatally and fundamentally
flawed. Its premises are faulty. It is almost too easy to disagree with about
everything he thinks or writes about. But
I don’t hate him. I make fun of his
pimping products, but I think he truly believes what he preaches. I can’t hate him for that. At least he is sincere. He doesn’t purposely tell people that which
will kill them. I’m sure Jim Jones was
as sincere, is my point really.
*
His latest article on the
mighty powerful semi-auto owner juggernaut that should have the elite and their
leftist brown shirt shock troops pissing into their jackboots is just another
in a long line of faulty assumptions.
Now, I’ve already conceded that it is actually entirely possible that
this time, after ninety years of nonviolently accepting whatever gun control
the feds dish out, just perhaps this time it will be different and the firearm
fetish boys will actually violently oppose gun control.
*
It actually might be
different this time since the Obammy Brigade Blacks were so empowered at an
exponential rate and Whites have been so targeted the last ten years in an all
out cultural war that maybe, just maybe, a few would discover testicular
fortitude and actually recognize that this gun control would actually get them
killed. After all, Blacks were already
allowed full on “knockout game” privileges.
It is easy to envision them given carte blanc stepping that up to
killing all the Whites they see ( both giving credence to the Nat Turner fear
of Negro militias armed by the ZOG, and the record companies fear of rap music
legitimizing White casualties ).
*
White boys know that this
time a gun ban would likely kill them.
Violently resisting is a legitimate self defense issue. That said, everything else about his
argument is problematic. His assumptions
that the military would be kept overseas, that there are no differences in gun
controls, that Posse Commitatus is still observed, that all eligible fighters
would fight, that most gun owners are trained-there is a long list of faulty
assumptions ( the article was referenced from the Woodpile Report on 5-22-18 ).
*
First, I’d like to talk
about what I consider to be the big one, the exclusion of the military in the
consideration of enforcing the ban. Why
does one assume that the military won’t be available. Are we going by the Glen Beck measurement of
energy availability and think there is 300 years of fracking oil left ( I swear
by all the gods, if I hadn’t heard it myself I never would have believed much a
boneheaded statement. Needless to say,
my tender ears were never violated by Beck again. I’m sure his advertisers for expensive safes
for expensive guns and freeze dried foods for expensive constipation are really
concerned I’m no longer part of his audience )?
*
Or are we going by the
reality of the petrodollar decline and collapse ( remember your Seneca Cliff
math-a slow rise and a sudden collapse )?
Why are we overseas? Colonialism. We haven’t enforced purchases from Das
Homeland since our manufacturing plant all got shipped over to Japan and China,
but since then we have enforced our worthless paper for black gold trade and
for that the US military needed to be mostly overseas ( not to mention that we’ve
never had a large domestic military-the elite are probably uncomfortable with
masses of poor enlisted within Hummer driving distance of their mansions ).
*
At some point, not only
will it be too expensive to field that military, it also will be
unnecessary. At the pace the petrodollar
is collapsing, I can’t see that day as all too far away. Now, there is going to have to be a reason to
withdraw the troops. You can’t just say,
“uh, by the way, your paper money is about to be worthless since it is no
longer backed by oil”. Oops, talk about
a panic! They need an excuse. I can think of several, but one really good
one would be “we banned guns for the children and white racist honky mofo’s are
being all yucky terrorists and such and so we need our brave boys to keep the
peace”.
*
Perhaps low in
probability, but certainly it is possible.
I’m not trying to say this WILL happen, only that the government has a
long history of doing stupid crap making things worse solving another problem. Like banning drugs since banning alcohol didn’t
work. I’ll return to that, but let’s
assume the military is brought home.
Britain didn’t willingly fold up its imperial tent, but they were forced
to. We will do the exact same thing (
but on an accelerated scale since the Brits went out during energy growth and
we will exit during an energy contraction ).
But rest assured we will lose our empire.
*
Times flies when you make
fun of Yuppie Scum. I’ll continue
tomorrow.
END ( today's related link https://amzn.to/2IVXuWE )
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there