ROME OR BRITAIN? 3
The thing about an empire is that
when you go through all the hard work of getting one, some jealous bitch is all
coveting your rightfully gained goods. You
stole it fair and square. Yet, they can’t
be happy for you. No, they try to take
it away. Britain had a huge empire,
largely an agricultural empire run on coal and rail, paying the elite in
textile profits. And everybody wanted a
piece of that pie. It was easy stealing
the land from Little Brown People who had no industrial capacity, but much
harder keeping other large powers away.
*
As stated yesterday, the primary
problem-not the ONLY problem, but a big one-was that Britain had used half of
her coal gaining the empire and that her two competitors the US and Germany had
just started using their energy stockpile.
Germany faced the same problem with Russia. A century of coal had been used by the time
they invaded Russia, and the Soviets were only twenty years into industrializing. Worse, they had oil as well. A lot of it.
A coal power cannot go up against an oil power. As Britain found out while she surrendered peacefully
to the US.
*
Because Britain was already
contracting energy-wise, the gold from South Africa didn’t help. When you run out of energy, money just bleeds
out faster buying it. The Maxim machine
gun didn’t help, as her true enemy was no longer Bush Bitches but other
colonial powers. Technology works
great. For a very short time and then
you are back spinning your wheels. And
competing with other great powers no longer helps, because you are just hemorrhaging
energy and treasure faster. But what
else can you do, right? Surrender later
or now, and most folks just pick later.
*
And don’t make fun of the French
surrendering. While she controlled Syria
and had some oil, as we found out invading Iraq it is almost impossible to
produce oil in the middle of counter-insurgency fighting. What energy she did have was used policing
her empire, primarily rubber to bring in income ( we didn’t invent artificial
rubber until about the middle of WWII ).
France just really didn’t have the resources to fight. They had the equipment at home but her
energies were focused on protecting her diminishing resources. And to be fair, Germany got all the cold
parts anyway J
*
Britain had already lost the economic
war by 1914. It would have been smart to
pour all her resources into protecting and exploiting the middle east,
bypassing Europe. To an extent they half
assed that and placed a large number of Dominion troops in the trenches and the
better home units in the middle east, but it was still a two front war. Yet, Britain has used to defending her empire
against the other powers. She felt she
always had to keep Europe weak in relation to herself as a preemptive measure
and fought many wars to do just that.
*
It wasn’t a bad strategy. It kept her in power for some time. But by fighting that one time too many, while
weakened already, her demise was assured.
She was still fighting using a coal powered economy in an oil economy world. She had an oil powered fleet, but that was
protecting a coal economy. What WWI
accomplished was that the world’s largest supplier of oil, the US, became the
premier oil economy and had all the old coal powered colonial powers defeat
each other. It was masterful, and makes
you all tingly to be an American.
*
Granted, the victory wasn’t
complete. The US then had to pit all the
old defeated colonial powers against each other again so that Russia could be
weakened enough for the US to best her in the new Oil Age war. That is why we financed Hitler ( yes, I
understand we did it for the profit of the banks. But energy is wealth, ultimately ). His only use to us was for him to drain
Russia while we took over Britain’s colonies.
Everyone applauds Churchill as Britain’s savior, but he was just America’s
bitch, dismantling the empire at our call.
*
What did she get out of it? The smallest part of the Rothschild’s pie, a
toe hold in the new financial order.
That is what allowed Britain to remain Detroit East instead of another
Portugal or Spain, Bermuda East, just a once proud colonial power acting to
pamper the tourists coming in from greater economies. The US used starvation as a threat against
Britain to assume world leadership position.
And that was us being NICE. And
before you think we can use the Wheat Weapon as we did in both world wars,
stop. And ponder our ethanol issue.
*
Let us recap the British Empire. They used up their coal gaining an
empire. We used up our oil gaining
ours. When they started running out of
coal, they were defeated economically if not yet militarily. We lost the Vietnam War which was NOT a
guerrilla war like Afghanistan. It was a
conventional war fought with total industrial production. When we didn’t have troops to fight we just
blew up the jungle or a bridge. We used
more tonnage of bombs in peripheral campaigns there than we did in WWII. It was our last one, but it WAS an industrial
war.
*
It was lost as our oil supply
peaked. The politicians didn’t lose the
war. Not the left protesters. Our energy situation lost us that war just as
Britain actually lost WWI ( the only real winner was the US ) because of her
lack of surplus energy ( SURPLUS being the key word here ). Technology didn’t save her empire. There are some indicators that Britain might
have been the actual developers of the computer age, just from a technological
sector point of view. But she had no
economy. The US is losing our
technological sector as well.
*
Britain had the Pound, the world
standard currency. And lost it all during
WWI buying supplies from the US ( as we are from China ). She had the Pound, South African gold, she
had Peruvian nitrates for fertilizer and munitions, men and supplies from India
and Oz, naval fuel from Iraq and did any of that save her? No.
She was an old coal power, with diminishing supplies. Her industrial centers were ruined before the
bombs dropped ( just as Detroit was aflame before the riots started ). War to preserve the empire just added another
nail to her coffin.
*
Why is Britain being occupied and
defeated by the Muzzies? Because
Globalizing America has degreed it so, and she has no power to resist. Only by acting as part of the American
banking system ( do you think it was an accident that she sold all her gold
reserves in the 90’s at their lowest possible value? ) does she survive above
Craphole Nation status. America’s rulers
jam immigrants down its own populations throats, and the other White Countries
must do the same so as not to gain a competitive advantage over the US. They must join us in the slide.
*
As the US weakens, mirroring Britain,
we are using the last of our energy and power to drag down our allies ( with
friends like the US… ). Just as Britain
drug down the other colonial powers. To “compete”
with our demise, the rest of the First World must have immigrant filled slums
to destabilize the culture, gender wars to tamp down wages and religious wars
to refocus the publics eyes away from the collapse. All this crap we see in the PC Wars, is
policy designed to divert us from the bankers losing their control.
*
The last of the oil cannot be used to
build renewable energy to Soft Land us.
The last of the oil is being used to keep those elites in power. The system would collapse with or without
them, but their desperation over losing their hookers and blow is why you are
seeing this particular flavor of collapse.
Why did WWI start? Not because of
an assassination or Germans wishing to bayonet Belgium babies ( sarcasm ), but
because England didn’t want to lose her power and because the US wanted much
more for themselves. It is as simple as
that.
*
Why will the US see civil war? Not because Leftists or Statists or even
OtherColors or anti-Constitutionalists. We
will see a very violent break-up of empire because our elite simply don’t want
to lose their power. Plus, other nations
don’t want to lose theirs ( they aren’t going to be the new global power. Impossible as the oil runs out. They just want to survive ). I’m done on the subject of the US mirroring
Britain. This is the end of this series
of articles. Tomorrow, I’d like to use
the greed and sense of self preservation of the individual as a guide to how
groups and nations act.
( .Y. )
( today's related Amazon link click here )
*
note: free for today books. Zombies here.
*
note: good article, an economist tells you the trouble with capitalism today click here
*
Please
support Bison by buying through the Amazon links here ( or from http://bisonprepper.com/2.html or www.bisonbulk.blogspot.com ). Or PayPal www.paypal.me/jimd303
note: free for today books. Zombies here.
*
note: good article, an economist tells you the trouble with capitalism today click here
*
*** Unless you are in extreme poverty, spend a buck a month here, by the above donation methods ( I get 4% of the Amazon sale, so you need to buy $25 worth for me to get my $1 ) or mail me some cash/check/money order or buy a book ( web site for free books, Amazon to pay just as a donation vehicle ).
*** My e-mail is: jimd303@reagan.com My address is: James M Dakin, 181 W Bullion Rd #12, Elko NV 89801-4184 ***E-Mail me if you want your name added to the weekly e-newsletter subscriber list.
* By the by, all my writing is copyrighted. For the obtuse out there