January Article 2 of 2

 

January Article 2 of 2

*

JFK AND VIETNAM

Every once in awhile I think it is nice to veer slightly away from my hair being on fire, as I am running about in a circle, screaming that the end is nigh. But of course, we can't talk about movie reviews ( as if there are any movies. I guess Corona means there is literally only one blockbuster movie each summer. And of course inevitably it is about super hero's. I was beyond shocked the other day when I veered off my normal walking path to check out the movie theater and they were up to what I thought were big city prices, $9. Good thing there is nothing to watch ) or the care and feeding of unicorns, or even the price of tea in China.

*

But we can talk about history that is tied in to imperialism, as we are pretty much in this pickle because of our failing empire. Well, that and the unhampered unhinged unimaginable and un-friggin-believable evil and greed of Red Shield, may their black hides rot in Hell for all of eternity ( relax, Super Woke Rangers, “black” as in Bubonic Plague, not as in race. If you had ever read any history except Devil Whitey Oppression you would know the term was a curse ). But I shan't digress. I want to talk about the Vietnam War, and everybody's favorite little liberal John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

*

I do not much care for JFK, merely a Clinton without most of his head. The difference from Clinton was that JFK got the CIA to kill his lovers and enemies, and Bill left those details to Hilary. So I guess we can at least give credit to Johnny Boy for being a real man where Bill was just a fat Soy Boy pussy. Anyway, I absolutely despise the assassination conspiracy theory as put out by the movie ( and all the books ) “JFK”. No, Sam I Am, the Military Industrial Complex did NOT kill Kennedy because he threatened their meal ticket. I shall show this, quite easily, with very little effort ( source, “Washington Rules” by Andrew J Bacevich ).

*

Now, I kinda sorta did enjoy the movie. Great actors, most in their prime. Terrible story, when it veered into a lot of areas. Oliver Stone has done some really good work, but sadly most are not on Jim's Scale Of Movie Greatness ( if you buy the movie because it begs for viewing after viewing, the movie is Great ). Some are, but the majority are not. Even Platoon was only great for some scenes, not the entire work, I don't believe it ages well, nor would I place it anywhere near the top of best war movies. With far too many Stone movies recently, which I'd add “JFK”, they are little more than Cat Lady Liberal Sky Screaming, a rectal lick to the establishment to continue working.

*

I'm sure Stone was passionate about the project. I'm sure he probably believed in the premise-it does seem to be a work of love. But Liberals do tend to want to blame everything on Evil Corporations, don't they? Now, I would never, ever, argue that corporations are nice folks. I would never say corporations were run well, or were necessary for the public good. I would rather nuke every last corporate headquarters from orbit, just to be sure they were extinct. But Liberals, being very retarded people except in their narrow specialties, if then, are flaming idiots.

*

Government, which liberals love as a problem solver, are much, much more evil than corporations. And central banks, which liberals, being humping retarded as hump, don't even realize are a threat, are exponentially more evil than governments. So let's stop blaming everything on corporations, shall we? And let's not give them any more credit than they are due. They are merely lapdogs doing their masters bidding. They have no power themselves, because they don't earn any money other than what they are allowed to keep. They have no real power, or control. They are Useful Idiots, just like Liberals.

*

But that isn't my argument. You need some facts and figures. So let's see how much business JFK gave both the CIA and the military industrial complex, before we just assume they lashed back out in anger and dread of losing funding. In Kennedy's first year in office, military spending rose 15%. JFK wanted to expand all aspects of the military, as he felt Eisenhower's mostly just nuclear deterrent was inadequate. The rise in spending, along with his speeches on his strategy, were both signal and proof of additional resources going to those who were part of the cabal.

*

ICBM production doubled, from thirty a month, to sixty. The submarine fleet that was being planned to use some of those missiles was bumped up from a proposed 29 to 41. The army got an additional 200k men, and its active duty divisions went from eleven to sixteen. More men were sent to Germany, and the Special Forces DOUBLED in size. The military went from JUST being a nuclear tripwire to a larger more flexible organization. One wonders, just how angry did this make anyone at the Pentagon?

*

Advisors in Vietnam went from 900 to seventeen thousand. They were also given official sanction to begin operating in combat operations ( okay, sure, of course they were probably already doing that, but this notified the world of our intentions, and more to our point here, notified the military of the coming spending orgy ). He also gave his aids speaking of toppling the South Vietnam leadership great leeway. JFK didn't care if the CIA got more dirty in more places, he just wanted to have a better say over operations, as he felt the Bay Of Pigs betrayal ( read, a threat to his political power ). Of course, his own bungling in the coup was on par with Cuba, but at least he was in charge.

*

The assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem, the friendly dictator the US had installed in the 50's, quickly sent the Vietnamese situation into bloody chaos, almost as if that was the whole intention all along ( wink, wink ), where the military had to get deeply involved To Save Our Democratic Ally. And don't think that that coup orchestration was the only missions that JFK had enlisted the CIA in. Under Eisenhower, the intelligence agency had been given 170 major missions by the President, in eight years. Under JFK, in less than three years, there was 163.

*

So, do you still think the CIA offed JFK because he had threatened to disband them after the Bay Of Pigs? That was political theater, people! He needed them to wage the Cold War, just as much as he needed the regular military forces, just like he needed the military corporations building all this new equipment. War is the health of the state, remember that one? JFK was making the state VERY healthy. Now, I'm not saying the CIA didn't have something to do with killing JFK. The CIA is only after what is good for the CIA.

*

I'm saying, the CIA didn't kill him for the stated reasons, the currently approved propaganda. They LOVED him being in charge of the Cold War. If Red Shield had told them to kill JFK, of course, they would have gladly done so. Vietnam was guaranteed to happen on Kennedy's watch, NOT Johnson's. LBJ just became the public fall guy for the war. It was planned to happen, not because a politician decreed it but because the entire imperial apparatus NEEDED it to happen. The CIA was getting its war, no matter who was nominally in charge. They would have turned around and popped LBJ if they had been told to. Assassins gotta assassinate, that is what they do.

*

JFK was NEVER any threat to the Intelligence Agencies, the military, the civilian companies supplying them, or to the empire. He was completely in their pocket, the only article of contention being the extra leeway that the White House had given the CIA to initiate its own operations. JFK only brought them under control so as to, in theory, have a coordinated imperial policy. And if that was the only conflict, the CIA would NEVER have gotten any help if they had decided on their own to kill him. Everyone else would have turned on the CIA, as JFK had been exactly who they needed as a President.

*

The myth that JFK was against Vietnam was a nice little fantasy folks tell themselves so that they can believe that we aren't an empire, that “democracy” isn't a code word used to control us, and that we aren't killed daily by our overlords as it suits them ( and if you doubt that, ask why Guomo is still in office, rather than in jail, for killing around ten thousand or so senior citizens, so as to provide proof of Corona. Mein Gott, people! Know your friggin enemy. Or, as our Chinese Dear Leader says, Enjoy Your Black People. Because if you aren't aware of who controls and uses you, you will foolishly live among the civilian shock troops happily ).

*

It is my contention that Vietnam WAS necessary to prevent a severe economic recession, the good 'ol “WWII Got Us Out Of The Depression” repeat. I could be wrong. I've never seen too many agree with this, if any. It could just be another one of my political fever dreams. I further agree with the far more popular and argued contention that the Federal Reserve Bank had JFK killed because he wanted the Treasury to assume money creation duties again. Having said that, I can see the holes in that theory. Why couldn't that also have been mere political campaign promises, like the threat to eliminate the CIA? I don't know enough details. I just think it is a more likely theory, far more plausible than the rest.

*

Hell, I don't even have a perfect theory as to why we were in Afghanistan. I don't like the “rare earth metals location” theory, because in twenty years we haven't mined dingus. I'm not too fond of “pipelines” theory, as China and Russia pretty much control all the surrounding areas, and pipelines can be diverted around. I did like the “water control of China” theory, but think that is REALLY impractical. It sounded better, without analysis. I know why we were in Iraq, for the PetroDollar, but still have no clear answer on Afghanistan ( and yes, both were argued to provide stimulus as did WWII and Vietnam, but before the turn of the century our economy was no longer about manufacturing, so while it might have been a entity profit center, it wasn't a national economic stimulus ).

*

I think that concludes today's Delusional Thinking Debunking. We at Jim Airlines hope you've enjoyed your experience and hope you'll join us again flying the Paranoid Sky's.

( .Y. )

*

That article was originally published early last year. To subscribe to the only survivalist magazine to be mailed instead of posted online where Woke Bitches can censor it, read the following:

BISON
PREPPER
MONTHLY
MAGAZINE

Malthus' Nightscape Is Nigh

Frugal Survivalism As If Prepping Is Time Sensitive

*

James M Dakin

181 West Bullion Road, Unit 12

Elko, Nevada 89801-4184

*

e-mail: jimd303@protonmail.com ( that is three ZERO three )

*

$1.22 per issue, as many or as few as desired, domestic mail. All overseas readers, $1.99 per issue ( prices subject to change ). That is for a mailed CD, which will contain PDF and MOBI files, extra writing from me when available, and public domain books. This is my cost ( subject to change ), and all that you are required to pay. However, gratuity, tip, donation is encouraged and appreciated on top of the above price ( please specify which amount is which ).

*

You may subscribe via e-mail ( when communicating with me, please include your real name as well ). Everyone’s cost is $1 an issue ( with the same plea for extra donations ). You will ONLY receive a PDF file of the monthly magazine, no extra material. The e-mail subscription will only be available while I have access online ( our local library closed for a year, so Going Dark can happen ).

*

You can send cash or US postage “forever” stamps, but for safety I encourage checks or money orders instead. OR PayPal me at

paypal.me/jimd303 ( or just use my e-mail at Paypal.com )

Make checks out to James M Dakin. I'm happy to correspond but would appreciate a Self Addressed Stamped Envelop to help me with costs, as this writing income is my only retirement. Free sample with e-mail or through the mail with SASE and SD Card.